nauseus

Not if these trials are really being conducted to prove guilt, it won't.

You didn't even read it properly, did you? Try again. Now you've modified your question too! You are a boring time-waster with trollistic leanings. TGIF

This broad claim is now only partially valid. Stratospheric temperatures generally decreased from the 1970's to about 2000, coincident with a reduction in the ozone layer. A gradual recovery of same (ozone) has prompted a reversal in that trend. Recently, stratospheric warming has occurred where ozone concentrations have recovered the most, away from the poles and at about 20-25 km above msl.

You didn't disagree with any of my points either. I am interested in the topic and have a far deeper background in it than you ever will.

You said Germany and the banks name you porky teller, you.

I wasn't talking about the content. Do you keep your longhorn beetles in a glass jar?

Germany is not in Asean either.

This section is headed "World News" - it might give you a clue.

It was a dark and stormy night.

What a patronizing, pompous pile! Grab a couple of scientific articles, cut, paste, edit and then instantly become an "educator" in earth sciences! Nope.

That's 3 in a row. What a turkey!

I see. The per capita qualifier is OK to use now.

And I think to myself What a wonderful world. Oh yeah!

There's an echo somewhere.

If that is true do you really think that's out of concern for the planet?

We all fart, even if some do not admit it. Methane is a GG which produces far more warming than CO2, So, think about the consequences next time you're about to let one rip!

Wow, that must mean I responded to an off-topic post! Forgive me....pleeeaase.

I said temporarily. Nag nag.

Self contradictory or what? Strong eruptions can temporarily reverse warming: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1510/global-effects-of-mount-pinatubo And it's sulfur dioxide not silicon dioxide.

Not that much? What do you think drove the increase in hydrocarbon usage - therefore emissions? I was talking about the world from 1950, not individual regions. And China - low population growth? Are you kidding? Below chart from your own source - more than doubled from 1950 - 2000!

You are quite right to point out the population and resource aspects. The world population has tripled since 1950 but these extra 5.4 billion people use up more than three times the amount of resources, far more wastefully in many cases, than was possible right after the end of WWII. Real needs, plus many less vital demands, from all these extra people have prompted much more farming, which has resulted in massive land clearance and deforestation, so that (previously) large carbon sinks around the world are now much smaller. Not the whole issue but very significant.

Trump! Ha ha! You just can't help yourself, can you?

Looks like most of the interest comes from Gammagodulin.

Encore, Compte du Cuttenpaste.

Or, "I understand I'm underpowered".