welovesundaysatspace

1 hour ago, vogie said:

 

Who will be next to leave the Jolly Boys Club?

Scotland or Northern Ireland. 

1 hour ago, Youlike said:

They should kick mr Gates out of the WHO...he's the boss now but he's never been a doctor.

The “boss” of the WHO is Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: “Dr Tedros holds a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottingham and a Master of Science (MSc) in Immunology of Infectious Diseases from the University of London. Dr Tedros is globally recognised as a health scholar, researcher, and diplomat with first-hand experience in research, operations, and leadership in emergency responses to epidemics. (...) 

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected as WHO Director-General for a five-year term by WHO Member States at the Seventieth World Health Assembly in May 2017.

He is the first WHO Director-General to have been elected from multiple candidates by the World Health Assembly, and is the first person from the WHO African Region to serve as WHO's chief technical and administrative officer.”
 

(https://www.who.int/dg/biography)

1 minute ago, CG1 Blue said:

Country of origin (USA) will be clear to see for anybody who is interested in seeing it. 

And remainers have been squealing like girls about US chickens being sanitised with chlorine long enough and loud enough, so the public know about this. 
 

You fail to see that the majority of people are uneducated and poor. They don’t read the fine print. They buy what looks nice and is cheap. You don’t even need to have chlorinated chicken for that. How many people you know read the ingredients list of what they buy? 

1 minute ago, CG1 Blue said:

 

If a consumer doesn't care and wants to buy the cheapest, then that's what they'll do. 

By that logic, we don’t need any consumer protection at all. 

16 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

That's not how markets work. They won't 'flood' the UK market with their chickens if UK consumers are not buying them. 

Ah, you think they will sell them as “Chlorinated Chicken”? 
 

Im afraid you don’t know how retail works. The fact that it’s chlorinated chicken will not be on the packaging, or just as a small footnote hidden somewhere in between other footnotes. And most people don’t read the fine print of their groceries but simply buy what’s cheap. That’s why people buy “light” stuff and then wonder why they get fat. 

6 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

I don't think it's possible to have those definites at this stage.

Of course, it would have been possible. That’s when you don’t put politics first. 

6 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

If it was possible they would have been provided. It's not in the government's interests to have businesses fail. 

The government’s interest is political, and businesses are collateral damage in that game. 
 

1 hour ago, Loiner said:

Not going to change anything - we are still getting fully the hell out of it. It’s up to the businesses to get their paperwork in order. 

What magic paperwork is that exactly that prevents a business from ending up in a two days delay? 

1 hour ago, Loiner said:

Any word on the queues for goods entering UK, or is this just another attempt at Project Fear for UK exports?

Project Fear from Michael Gove? 

33 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Wassup Fritz, headline not to your liking.

Quite the opposite, I had a great laugh. And even more so at you for getting all wet in your pants for nothing because you didn’t read past the headline of your Mickey Mouse paper ????  

9 minutes ago, RayC said:

To call it shoddy journalism would be generous. 'Shoddy' is too mild a word to describe this drivel, and it hardly qualifies as journalism.

I wasn’t surprised that Brexiteers read the Mickey Mouse press. But reading only the headlines — priceless ???? 

3 hours ago, Loiner said:

It's a Reuters article, so always anti-Brexit. Isn't it funny how frequently TVF manages to find these? 

I don’t know what’s more amusing. That you seem to believe your own conspiracy theories, yet are still here, or that until today you haven’t noticed that TVF sources all its international news from Reuters apparently. But I guess that happens when people only read the British Mickey Mouse press (and only the headlines of it ????).  
 

37 minutes ago, kingdong said:

how about the french failing to use the law to stop illegal migrants  entering britain instead of aidding and abetting them,and people wondered why the uk voted to leave.

I’m not aware the French are in breach of any laws, but as I said: Take legal action if you feel your rights have been infringed by someone. That’s what I do, that’s what everyone I know does, that’s what the EU will do, that’s what you can do too. 

2 hours ago, kingdong said:

and how many member states have granted their citizens a binding referendum  on if they would like to leave?

I don’t know, and it‘s up to each member state as a sovereign nation. Not the EU‘s job as someone here suggested. 
 

And, as far as I’m aware, all member states are representative democracies. So the constitutional way would be to vote for a party that promises to leave the EU. That didn’t happen. 

14 minutes ago, kingdong said:

like you do wiyh your big red bus obsession.

Not sure what you’re referring to and what that has to do with the fact that leaving the EU is each member state’s own business as a sovereign nation.  

4 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Really everyone meaning the 26 other nations.

Every EU member states has the same rights as the UK exercised. They can leave at any time. They don’t even have to hold a referendum for it. It’s their own domestic business as a sovereign nation and member state. 
 

4 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Even on the UK's referendum the EU asked he UK to hold another referendum,

It clearly did not. 
 

4 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

like they do in Holland or Ireland or ignore it. Keep voting until hey get the desired result.

It clearly did not. 
 

You need to do your homework and read the treaties before posting false information like this. 

6 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

In fact why wont the EU give everyone a vote to leave as they are such democratic loving people. 

The EU does. See Brexit. 

7 hours ago, RayC said:

Why is 'No deal' good for either side?

It is “good” when the alternative is to have an agreement with a rogue state that cannot be trusted and with said agreement damaging your economy more than no deal. 

Good. This means no deal but fines and sanctions for those frauds. 

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

If the system was purely who got the most votes, 2 or 3 states might effectively decide who was President which the other 47/8 might not want.

No. It would mean that everyone has one vote that counts the same, regardless of where one lives. Because it’s people who have a vote, not states. 
 

21 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

This is the kind of thing that happens in 3rd World countries

run by dictators,who do anything to win elections

aka USA. 

10 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

 

The various threats to prevent trade in foodstuffs between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK

Are you in lala land again? 
 

10 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

punitive tariff regimes designed to punish by damaging or even wrecking certain industries

You are in lala land again, aren’t you? 

54 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Looks like Pelosi's threat means nowt.

And Biden, the next loser, has been told to stay out of it because he doesn't know what he's talking about anyway.

Nice example showing why educated people don’t read the garbage press. (1) Quoting only half the statement (2) Using it to falsely claim something that he didn’t say (3) Completely missing the point that it’s the (Democrats controlled) congress that decides (4) Enough to keep their imbecile readers entertained. 
 

Not surprised Brexiteers read these Mickey Mouse papers.