welovesundaysatspace

36 minutes ago, vogie said:

No they didn't, that is a remainer lie.

41 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

As a Brit i love reading about those Europeans who keep telling us what is best for us. It is hilarious as they think they understand the Brits but have no idea. Like the remain vote would win in 2016. like BJ would never be prime minister. You and your like have made so many predictions that fail you continue to embarrass yourselves.

 

Oh, where did I tell you what’s best for you? 
Where did I make any predictions? (Though you must admit it’s a bit bold to talk about predictions when you’re a Brexiteer) 

Where did I even talk about “the Brits”? ???? 

You gotta work on your reading-comprehension skills ????‍???? 

3 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Yes, only the Remainer truckers are hoping that their constant whinging and wining will eventually lead to not having Brexit, so won't have the correct documents. Leave truckers are on message and will have no problems with their documents.

Man, you really gotta give me some of the stuff you’re smoking. Do you have a good therapist? ???? 

1 hour ago, lungbing said:

But there has not been any Brexit failures. 

Absolutely not. How could there be any failures when you’re holding all the cards and can do things in an afternoon over a cup of tea? ???? 

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

But they have had FOUR years to plan for the worst case. Granted it is in unknown territory but what have they done in the last 4 years?

Isn’t it quite telling that Brexiteers don’t care about outcomes but who’s to blame? Lovely ???? 

1 hour ago, Loiner said:

More Remainer truckers moaning.

Or is Remainer Reuters to blame? 
 

As a European, I love reading all those Brexit failures. It keeps giving and giving. Brexiteers have so much egg on their face by now, they look like a bukkake party. Lovely. 

44 minutes ago, tebee said:

 

And they announced this on 4th October  giving everybody all over the world 3 months to comply.

No no, @Loiner said they had four years to prepare, so it’s their own fault. So screw them; who needs businesses anyway when you can have blue passports? 
 

Another great Brexit success story. As a European, I keep LMAO. What a great comedy Brexit is ???? 

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

How was Hillary Vs Trump before the election?

• Biden has a net-positive fav/unfav rating in our latest poll (43 percent/42 percent), while Clinton didn’t in the Oct. 2016 NBC News/WSJ poll (40 percent/50 percent).
• Biden has been at 50 percent or higher on the ballot in five-straight NBC News/WSJ polls, while Clinton only got to 50 percent or higher twice in two-way matchups during the general election (and both times were right after “Access Hollywood”).
• Biden’s lead since January has consistently been between 6 and 11 points (with the exception being his 14-point lead right after the first debate), while Clinton’s lead over Trump ranged between 3 and 11 points.
• Biden has consistently led among seniors, while Clinton never did, as the Cook Political Report’s Dave Wasserman points out.

Full text: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/here-s-why-biden-s-2020-lead-different-clinton-s-n1243708

12 minutes ago, MikeN said:

The 14 days is generally accepted as long enough to find most cases, but not 100% of them. 

And people need to understand that that’s the same with every test, whether Covid-19 or other things. When you get tested for HIV, it used to be that your test shouldn’t be earlier than 3 months after your last sex. With the newest generation tests, it’s supposed to be conclusive after 4-6 weeks already. What that actually means is that 95% of people develop enough antibodies/antigen after 4-6 weeks to show up on a test. It still means that you could be one of the 5% who don’t. There’s always a trade-off; if you were to target 100% safety it would mean you’d have to quarantine everyone for longer, even though the majority could safely leave quarantine after 14 days negative tests. 

52 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Good move, Trump! Instead of some doctored left wing biased version intended to cast him in a negative manner, he preempted them! ???? 

Now he cast himself in a negative manner, and cannot even falsely claim it’s just some doctored left wing biased version. (Not that anyone other than his QAnon friends would have believed that crapload anyways.) 

What an idiot. 

13 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

I have done enough reading from reputable sources, one of which showed the inventor of the PCR tests stating that they cannot detect Covid-19 on their own

That’s nonsense. 
 

Quote

any dead cells from past viruses would flag a positive result

That’s always the case with PCR tests, whether it’s Covid or Chlamydia. That’s why you don’t do a test of cure too close to an antimicrobial treatment, for example, as the body may still he flushing out dead cells (another reason is false negatives btw). 
 

Quote

so what do you make of that ?

You don’t just rely on one positive. You do confirmatory tests, which may include additional PCR Tests as well as x-Rays and looking at a patient‘s symptoms. 
 

PCR is super reliable and one of the best technologies available in modern diagnosis. There are infections that practically you can’t even detect without PCR. 
 

22 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The only relevant law is Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. In March 2017 A50 was triggered. In March 2019 the nominal 2 year nominal time limit for exit 'arrangements' to be made was up and the EU was free to say "on yer bike". But they didn't, did they? 

You are right, they could have denied the UK‘s requests for extensions. 

39 minutes ago, webfact said:

attempt to provide advantage

At least they’re admitting they only have a chance by interrupting and talking over the other candidate.