rattlesnake

Indeed. "Discredited" by who? That's the real question. Who draws the list of unworthy people? To be rejected by the members of the most nefarious and corrupt cartel ever to exist is more a badge of honour than anything else.

FLASHBACK: Fauci threatens to take away the rights of individuals who refuse to get vaccinated. What should the punishment be for this guy? VID_20250516_021125_276.mp4

Reminder - Pfizer knew by April 2021 that 1,225 people died within 3 months of their COVID vaccine rollout. They also knew the shots were damaging minors’ hearts, with warnings from Israel’s Health Ministry and pediatric groups. Yet, they stayed silent. Worse, FOIA’d emails reveal a cover-up reaching the highest levels—Dr. Fauci, Dr. Walensky, POTUS, and 15 White House staffers were informed. Instead of transparency, they crafted a 17-page redacted script to lie to the public. In April-May 2021, they downplayed myocarditis and pericarditis in young men and teens as “mild,” “transient,” and “rare,” despite knowing the truth. Then, they launched a summer-long propaganda blitz, using TikTok influencers to push the jab on kids. Dr. Naomi Wolf, renowned author and whistleblower, exposes this betrayal: “This was a deliberate campaign to mislead and endanger our youth.” This is a scandal of historic proportions. The American people deserve answers. Who authorized the lies? Why were children targeted? Source: Ed Dowd 1747352151599.mp4

Ah, flashback to the good old days of 2020-2021, when everyone had gone utterly insane… and those of us who said elementary rational things were the "crazy", "dangerous" ones… A friendly reminder of what was "normal" and "reasonable" in 2020:

Yeah, it's either that or they paste Grok results… But hey, they're the smarter, educated folk, let's pay heed.

This is your mic drop moment, is it?

Incorrect. Listen to top virologist Dr. Redfield: 46:40: "I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity. I think they should have responsibility like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product and I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely Covid and Long Covid, but among my, quote, "Long Covid" patients are people that don't have long covid but they have mRNA vaccine injury, right, and there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized…" Now put this into perspective with what he stated during a Senate hearing last year: he does not administer the mRNA shots in his own practice because he believes the Spike proteins they contain are “toxic to the body” and "the mRA was persisting much longer than it should" in some patients. He confirmed it crosses the blood-brain barrier and that the jabs don't prevent infection and have side effects which were hidden by the authorities. https://rumble.com/v56ws2r-sen.-ron-johnson-with-cdc-former-cdc-director-dr.-robert-redfield.html

46:40: "I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity. I think they should have responsibility like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product and I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely Covid and Long Covid, but among my, quote, "Long Covid" patients are people that don't have long covid but they have mRNA vaccine injury, right, and there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized…" Now put this into perspective with what he stated during a Senate hearing last year: he does not administer the mRNA shots in his own practice because he believes the Spike proteins they contain are “toxic to the body” and "the mRA was persisting much longer than it should" in some patients. He confirmed it crosses the blood-brain barrier and that the jabs don't prevent infection and have side effects which were hidden by the authorities. https://rumble.com/v56ws2r-sen.-ron-johnson-with-cdc-former-cdc-director-dr.-robert-redfield.html

The wording is perfectible indeed. It does not change the substance of what Redfield said, though: - The "Long Covid" (he puts the terms inside quotation marks, as I have been doing for years) diagnosis has been used to mask vaccine injury - Fauci was involved in gain of function research - The vaccines contain cancer-causing ingredients - The safety data has been withheld He had previously stated during a Senate hearing that he does not administer the mRNA shots in his own practice because the spike protein they contain is “toxic to the body” and "the mRNA was persisting much longer than it should" in some patients. He confirmed the lipid nanoparticles cross the blood-brain barrier and that the jab doesn't prevent infection and has side effects which were hidden by the authorities. https://rumble.com/v56ws2r-sen.-ron-johnson-with-cdc-former-cdc-director-dr.-robert-redfield.html It's good that you agree with him, I do too. Lots here would be well advised to follow that example.

Here you go, full interview below. He says several things the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for years (and quite a few people on this forum won't want to hear them), such as: - Covid was lab-engineered - Fauci was involved in the engineering - The mRNA vaccines contain cancer-causing ingredients such as SV40 and nucleic acids The exact quote on Long Covid is: "I… you know, one of the problems… and I'm controversial on this. People in the industry don't like me for what I'm about to say. My son is probably telling me not to say it right now in my ear. But, I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity. I think they should have responsibility, like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product. And I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now, which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely COVID and long COVID. But among my, quote, long COVID patients are people that don't have long COVID, but they have mRNA vaccine injury. And, it's, you know, there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized and compensated, and I think that's wrong. I think, hopefully, Kennedy will have a critical review, not saying that the mRNA vaccines aren't safe, not saying they shouldn't… Let's just have an objective review by the FDA. Marty… Marty, you gotta review these products. Let's see the safety data. Don't tell me you're holding it off till 2026. No. I want the safety data out there."

Surname Khaleche, North African.

Is this a reference to my recent mention of Dr. Redfield (which you refused to address because you were supposedly tired of "the idiocy", yet here you are a couple of days later, pushing the same talking points – not tired of the idiocy anymore, I see… but the Redfield issue is circumvented…)? Here you go, from the horse's mouth, feel free to comment. "I… you know, one of the problems… and I'm controversial on this. People in the industry don't like me for what I'm about to say. My son is probably telling me not to say it right now in my ear. But, I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity. "I think they should have responsibility, like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product. And I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now, which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely COVID and long COVID. But among my, quote, long COVID patients are people that don't have long COVID, but they have mRNA vaccine injury." "And, it's, you know, there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized and compensated, and I think that's wrong. I think, hopefully, Kennedy will have a critical review, not saying that the mRNA vaccines aren't safe, not saying they shouldn't…" "Let's just have an objective review by the FDA. Marty… Marty, you gotta review these products. Let's see the safety data. Don't tell me you're holding it off till 2026. No. I want the safety data out there." video_2025-05-13_18-31-28.mp4

In an ideal world, we would not exist. Just think of the benefits for the gene pool…

Possibly, but I can't find recent articles advocating the vaccine. Even the Bangkok Post says they are useless: Newer strains do not respond to regular vaccination due to the vaccine's capability to protect only against older strains of Covid-19. The report has led to a reduction in the procurement of Covid-19 vaccines for hospitals. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/3024071/covid-alert-as-6-die-last-week France, on the other hand, is still all in as if this was 2021.

In Thailand, The Science appears to be backpedalling as the truth is too hard to conceal anymore. Shoutout to Dr. Yong, Mister "safe and effective": Covid-19 surge: Chulalongkorn virologist advises vaccination strategy By contrast, current Covid-19 vaccines are expensive—nearly 10 times the cost of flu shots—less effective against new variants, and more likely to cause side effects. Thus, he does not personally recommend widespread Covid-19 vaccination at this stage, particularly considering the reduced severity of the disease and the cost-benefit balance. https://www.nationthailand.com/news/general/40049804

There have been several studies on this. And empirically, it is clearly observable that pregnant women have become a rare sighting over the past few years.

Good for you to follow the science rather than The Science™.

Absolutely, The Science™.

Because of a well-known psychological process called the sunk cost fallacy.

He is one of the top virologists in the world, ex-CDC Director with a demonstrated track record of evidence-based research, of course he has data to back it up. He 100% matches the profile you have been citing for years to justify your stance on the Covid vaccine, and it is remarkable (though not in the least surprising) to see you refuse to look into what he says simply because it isn't what you want to hear. The good news, at least, is that you can now refrain from stating that only virologists are qualified to talk about this issue, and other inanities such as this:

I know a couple of people who developed severe arthritis right after their jabs. One immediately understood the causation and says she made a terrible mistake, the other one is a doctor and has mental barriers preventing her from looking at the evidence – she is boosting herself to oblivion, last I heard she was on her 5th shot.

Blabla.mp4

Heavily.

Why?