youreavinalaff

It depends where you live and where you go. In most towns and cities there are safe places and places you wouldn't want to go. What has ability to afford got to do with things? What is pad ka prow?

Isn't it correct that, generally speaking, certain posters prefer citable figures rather than personal experiences? Would that poster's most recent posts contradict that view?

I agree I mis quoted you. You said: "Because I have a handful of friends in the UK, all the perpetrators of terrorism in the UK have been identified and their identities published. Non of my small number of UK friends are amongst them." Uk friends, not English friends. None the less, you included location/nationality to wriggle. I will ask once again, please answer... How do you know none of your friends( location and nationality unspecified) have never committed an act of terrorism ( unidentified or identified)? That was, my original question prior to you making it a saga by dodging the question. Additionally, how do you know all perpetrators of terrorism in UK have been identified? You don't as you are incorrect.

The OP is,asking two questions. Neither can be answered with total accuracy until the location of his IO is known. What I can say from my experience of Buriram office... 1. I've never known a KR2 being needed for a 60 day extension. 2. Different stories for 1 year. Some say same day, some say 24 hrs old is OK.

That comment just proves you've been watching too much fiction.

You don't get the choice of using protection rackets. Well, actually you do. Pay or pain. That's an attack on the public. There are women who are not prostitutes until they are pimped. That's an attack on a member of the public.

I was quoting another posters comment. It is the right question in context to that.

Gangsters never engage with drug users? Never pimp prostitutes? Never run protection rackets? That's new to me.

You keep adding to the identities. Originally it was friends aren't terrorists. Then friends who have not been identified as terrorists. Then English friends who........ That's not maths. It's wrigglework. No bonus. Unless there's one for repetition.

Moved the goalposts again. Why not just admit it? You can't back up your comment. Simple.

The laws of probability doesn't say anything about impossibility. If everyone used your calculations, many would be surprised to find they are in the minority. This is a thread about Britain. Please use British English. Please tell how you know none of your friends have never committed a terrorist act.

Still no answer.

An expected kind of response. ie. No answer to the question.

Yes, blunder. You attempted to rectify it by adding " been identified". I asked "how do you know?" in reference to you saying none of your friends have committed terrorist attacks. So, I ask again. How do you know none if your friends have never committed terrorist attacks?

Who said anything about being identified? Oh. You did when you realised you'd made a blunder.

How do you know? Next.

We already know you suffer from selective reading. Now we add selective observing and selective reasoning. Selective understanding is not far away.

But you don't agree with that. At least you didn't when I used my "feet on the ground" in supermarkets and in pubs approach.

Oh. I do know about politics. Galloway is part of a new party. What are their policies? The ones you say he will follow?

Remember to put me on ignore when you set up your next username.

Topic of religion? I'm not.

Not my problem. Seems to be yours.

The topic is "mob rule". I've never mentioned "Macro". You were the one who mentioned culture in Japan and Thailand.

You mean franchised outlets. I see now. Nice to see you are now recognising tribes as part of Thai history and culture You're getting there. But, then again I, always knew you would. You live in a region where no one can afford to shop in Makro.

Said "Pedantic Bignok".