youreavinalaff

I'm not clueless or disgusting. I'm not defending him as, at time of writing, there is nothing to defend him against. If strong evidence comes to light, currently only allegations, heresay and some people using their dislike for him to try him by social media, and it's proven he did what the allegations say, I will be the first to call for prosecution.

Evidence?

Really? Saville was a pedophile.

I can't see the evidence showing it to be non consensual. She seems quite happy in that embrace. My wife would not be in that situation. She believes in her wedding vows. A member of my family? If they were happy, as the woman in the photos seems to be, it's up to her/him.

I have not seem any evidence of such. I've read claims and accusations but not seen any evidence. It would appear, at this stage, neither have law enforcement as, at time of writing, no arrests have been made.

My opinion has always been, not just for Mr.Brand but everyone in general, innocent until proved guilty. Trial by social media means nothing in a court of law. Both the accusers stance and the accused's stance should be accepted equally until there is evidence and proof to prove or disprove either.

I do. All target voters. Your idea of target voters is selective.

But, off topic. We all know how much you hate off topic posts. That said, it likely only off topic posts you don't agree with that cause you distress.

I wonder, is all that twaddle an opinion?

I've already stated my opinion. Although it was not accepted by some and often when I do state my opinion I'm told it stands for nothing as I can provide a link. Anyway, there have been no charges. No evidence produced. Neither has anyone made a statement. Therefore, there is nothing to defend him for and I have not defended him, neither will I if he is eventually taken to court and found guilty. Your last sentence is a disgrace.

Yep. So why mention Matt Hancock and MP's friends snd families and billions pounds, and, snd, etc?

Erm, I said policies and proposed policies. Erm, a party does not need to be in power to have proposed policies.

It was you who posted it. Not the accuser.

The electorate notice uturns on policy and proposed policy by all parties. You seem to only notice those from a particular party and then seem to think the electorate also do.

Duplicate post. Sorry.

Yes, there have been prople on here too. I was only pointing out there is a bigger picture too.

You suggested rape without a condom. That's a start.

Your opinion? Nice to see you are the entitled one. I bow to your superiority.

Sorry. I didn't realise Asean Now was the entirety of social media.

Those comments don't deserve a reply.

It never is.

Yes, several times.

Exactly. You both object to accusations/assumptions/theories, prior to a trial. On that you agree. Just as I said. So, it's time to stop the suggestions, whether for or against, and time to wait for a trial.

So, people can go around making accusations about someone and, because what some people may say he is like, he can be branded a rapist? Such a strange outlook.

No. By saying "there hasn't been a trial yet." In reply to him saying " there hasn't been a trial yet". Same conclusion. Agreement. Point proven.