josephbloggs

Utterly and completely clueless. Explains a lot. But keep going, got to keep up the 100+ per day post count, that's the most important thing!! Go you!

The cult followers are so blind. The US without the EU is nothing. And vice versa, but I think the EU could survive better without the US than the US could without Europe. Hopefully we will find out soon when America retreats up its own backside and is cut off by its former EU partners. The world will laugh.

Don't think Elon Musk has had an effect yet.

I know you are, but what am I? Sorry, that's about the level of intelligence of your "debates". Tedious.

This topic is about the EU. You are only one doing the cherry picking by singling out Greece. Should I single out the worst performing US states? Mississippi isn't doing too well is it. And how is California's budget deficit again? $55 billion last year wasn't it? How many times has it nearly gone bankrupt? (It would have been declared bankrupt several times if not for the fact that states are not allowed to declare themselves bankrupt). The EU is the world biggest economy. If Greece was flying it would be doing even better!

The EU is the world's largest economy. Spectacular failure?

Which airline did you get business class return for 60k THB?

I think they should bring back the Ford Scorpio Mk II Saloon - what a looker!

Nope. What I was saying was that nobody on here who has an EV bought it to save the world. Seems they bought them because they are excellent value for money, they have better performance and comfort, lower running costs etc. I don't believe there is a single person here who's primary reason was to save the world, they really don't care.

A nazi, drunk on his own power, who thinks he looks cool but will look back in future years after he has been humbled and cringe. As should every single American.

We have a new member of the "EV nonsense" club!

No one is STOPPING. There are plenty of legacy manufacturers who put their fingers in their ears and covered their eyes and hoped EVs would go away. They didn't invest in the technology, they just hoped it would pass. They are still trying to get EV models out but they are not competitive. Looks at Nissan's EVs - pathetic. Look at Toyota's - pathetic. Very very expensive and pathetic. Meanwhile the Chinese brands invested heavily over the last 20 years and are so so many light years ahead that the legacy marques simply can't compete hence shelving projects as no one would buy them as they are too expensive and too inferior in spec and technology. It is almost too late for them to catch up now and many are partnering with the Chinese to license their tech. Toyota have literally invested millions and millions in anti EV propaganda hoping their brand name alone would see them through and the technology would go away. It hasn't, and it won't. Toyota markets "self charging hybrids" which only the most gullible would ever fall for and pay ridiculous money for. Expect to see many legacy brands either go under or merge with each other over the coming years.

I am neither a boomer - much younger sorry - and I don't have an EV. I am just not a MAGA anti-EV blinkered sheep. I have an open mind, I have tried EVs and can form my own opinion. What is your opinion based on exactly?

Another genius with a worthless comment.

And they are "just around the corner", right? Almost ready, coming soon. It's good to know the millions that Toyota spends on anti EV propaganda has reached at least one person. Would love to know more about the technologies and how they are going to destroy EVs. You would have a link I assume? How does compressed or or water power an engine? Keen to learn.

Literally no one who drives an EV on here cares.

Ok, in that case I apologise, I got it wrong.

I hope by "they" you are not talking about Toyota. So who are "they" and what are these alternatives?

Yes I did. And I was questioning your "I can't breathe "tactic". No doubt a hilarious reference to the death of George Floyd. Sad.

Yes.

You need help.

"Tactic"?

Because 90% of people on here have the same anti-Thai prejudice as you do. You still haven't answered why MONEY was the issue when their decision undoubtedly cost them much much more than landing at Changi would have done. I look forward to you explanation because no doubt you have thought it through. None of your 90%-ers have answered the question, they all just parrot the same cliche.

As said where? In your head? They had to pay for fuel to fly all the way back, they had to pay to land back at BKK, had to pay for the logistical nightmare of deplaning everyone, getting their bags off, storing them, looking after everyone for 6-7 hours (feeding and giving them drinks), assuming letting those people go who didn't want to be rescheduled, then bringing in a replacement plane, fuelling it, catering it, staffing it with an entirely new crew, then getting it a slot to fly out of BKK and fly in to SIN, then flying out. All to save a landing fee in Singapore. Do you see how ridiculous you sound? This forum is full of the most moronic anti-Thai posters who post without even thinking.

Tough men don't laugh.