fasteddie

4 hours ago, Pedro 58 said:

It's true that he, 

1. Should have had a helmet on, and

2. Shouldn't have done the under take, however,

if you look at the video, he was on his side of the road and as such was in the right, although in Thailand he would've been in the wrong. 

No he was in the wrong, he overtook when it was not safe to do so.

He's just trying to fit in.

14 hours ago, tomwct said:

One of them recorded the event and then posted on Facebook!These are future MP's for Thailand. 

Generals more like!

12 minutes ago, fasteddie said:

Bottom of page 2 and page 3.

 

 

A.C.GraylingFightingforEurope.pdf

Or google House of commons briefing paper 07212.

7 minutes ago, nauseus said:

I have a 33 page doc. P2 is contents and P3 nothing relevant.

Bottom of page 2 and page 3.

A.C.GraylingFightingforEurope.pdf

18 minutes ago, nauseus said:

No   give me page and para please.

Bottom of page 2 and page 3.

6 hours ago, nauseus said:

That's just a blatantly biased opinion, Grayling is committed and demented Europhile and RIC (Remoaner-In-Chief).

 

Constitutionally, the referendum result was decisive and binding and not just advisory. The result authorizes and mandates the British Government to exercise its legal power to give notice to leave the EU under Article 50.

 

Mr. Cameron said before the referendum that the result would be respected and acted on by the government. If he thought he could have managed any way to survive by ignoring all of that, he probably would have done it. 

I take it you didn't bother reading "Briefing paper 07212", the referendum was legally not binding and very far from decisive.

37 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Thanks. But my guess is that if the remain vote had won by any majority, then there would have been widespread acceptance and significantly less moaning by the leavers, than has been seen from the remain camp now that they have lost this democratic and binding referendum. Just my guess, of course.

Not binding, read on.

A.C.GraylingFightingforEurope.pdf

Sorry, can't stop to chat, still frantically winding my clock back 40yrs.

The Thai army has a long history of killing innocents, TiT!

Their enthusiasm in bed.

3 hours ago, bangrak said:

What a waste of trees to print over 434 (four-hunderd-thirty-four!) pages such a North Korean glorifying fable about 'the great leader''s (via his puppet/clone-sister's) fabuloulsly successfull(y ruinous) rice scam (Nr.2)!

'The writers said the book is about the benefits the farmers gained from the Yingluck Shinawatra government's rice subsidy scheme': when it would be 'news', this would be the perfect example of fake news!

This is really scandalous, as the 'grassroots', the small, poor farmers got nothing, zilch, nada from the rice schemes(scams), but prices for seeds, fertilizer, pesticides higher than ever before, higher interest rates for loans, etc. (guess who collected most of the extra money generated by it: the 'friends of'...), ...that while the production of their rice culture was deemed too small for them to even participate to the (in)glorious scheme! Yes, red apologists, they probably would still follow the Shins' orders in an election, voting personally (under the watchfull eyes of ...), or 'renting-out' their ID-cards for a few days...

In fact, it would also be interesting to know who has been financing the printing and distribution of this masterwork of misleading propaganda...

The 'book' coming out now hasn't of course any link with the court hearings of Yingluck and the associated scammers being, at last, nearing their end, for sure, ...nor aiming to create any pressure on the ones to issue a sentence about the scam, ...and of course could never be associated with the intent to stir up tensions in the 'red territories' in case of a negative outcome for the scammers...

To conclude: the writers (as the inspirers(!), and sponsors(!)?) of the book cannot be accused of hypocrisy when they say it has been written 'about' the farmers, and not 'for' the farmers, as who could expect poor and, alas, little educated farmers to spend their short nights of rest to attempt(!) reading such a 434 pages logorrhea, even when they would get the book for free!

Why and for whom was this book written...? 

15 minutes ago, transam said:

Perhaps some of our gray cells are all we need....For many they cannot deal with life with  what they were born with....Are you one....?

Yes, and so are you unless you're going to tell me you've never taken prescription drugs.

3 hours ago, colinneil said:

Scum lock him up throw away the key.

Selling drugs, destroying lives, pure scum.

Oh piffle paffle, nothing wrong with ganja, try it sometime and chill out.

A mother-in-law stopped by unexpectedly to the recently married couple's house. She knocks on the door, then immediately walks in. She is shocked to see her daughter-in-law lying on the couch, totally naked.

"What are you doing?" she asked.

"I'm waiting for Jeff to come home from work," the daughter-in-law answered.

Now THAT'S  "Rigor Mortis"!

6 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You obviously don't agree with most people about most things. As soon as an every-day expression is used you complain to divert from the main topic. Why don't you provide some serious arguments about what is so great about the EU, why the UK should stay in it and why the referendum vote should be ignored!

 

 

" and why the referendum vote should be ignored!"

House of commons briefing paper 07212, issued to all MP's 3rd June 2015, Section 5 says "This referendum is advisory only. It doesn't bind either Parliament or the government to act on it's outcome".

23 minutes ago, Grouse said:

It's been on every News feed I have seen? Was it not mentioned on Jeremy Kyle?

1 hour ago, Kevbo said:

It wasn't a bad one 

You're right, it was atrocious, built on nothing but lies and racism.

1 hour ago, blazes said:

 

Yes, thanks for this reminder that ALL the politicians (whether Tory, Labour or Lib-Dem)  who committed these crimes against British assets and infrastructure were solid supporters of the EU....

That's a rather sweeping statement, I'd love to see your proof of that.

On 16/02/2017 at 2:47 AM, Daffy D said:

One of Trump’s assistants says to him, “Sir, we’re mining too many coal mines.” Trump replies, “Well, mine less.”
A writer and grammar expert then turns to him and says, “Mine FEWER!” Trump looks up and says, “Yes?”

 

Boom Boom !!

In the one I heard he turns round and says "Shh, don't call me that".

Much as I hate to agree with this war criminal, he's right on this one, brexit was built on lies from beginning to end.

A very successful attorney parked his brand new Porsche 911 Turbo in front of his office, ready to show it off to his colleagues.
As he was getting out, a truck came barrelling down the road, drifted right and completely tore off the driver's door.
Fortunately, a cop was close enough to see the accident and pulled up behind the now door-less Porsche with his lights flashing.
Before the cop had a chance to ask any questions, the attorney started screaming hysterically about how his precious Porsche, which he had just purchased the day before, was completely ruined and no matter how any car body shop tried to make it new again, would never be the same.
After the lawyer finally wound down from his rant, the cop shook his head in disbelief, "I can't believe how materialistic you lawyers are," he said, "You are so focused on your possessions that you neglect the most important things in life."
"How can you say such a thing?" asked the lawyer.
The cop replied, "Don't you even realize that your left arm is missing? It was severed when the truck hit you!"
"OHH, MY GOD!" screamed the lawyer. . . "My frickin' Rolex!