Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Continued Vietnam Tourism Growth Challenges Thailand

Vietnam’s tourism sector is expanding rapidly, with the country welcoming more than 21 million foreign visitors in 2025, around 20% higher than the previous year. The growth has strengthened Vietnam’s position as a major tourism destination in Southeast Asia and increased competition with Thailand, particularly in the important Chinese visitor market.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

According to a report cited by Fortune, Vietnam attracted 5.3 million Chinese tourists in 2025, surpassing Thailand’s approximately 4.5 million arrivals from China. The figures highlight Vietnam’s emergence as a significant regional rival as international tourism continues to recover following the COVID-19 pandemic.

A key factor behind Vietnam’s success is the diversity of its tourism offerings. Destinations include major cities such as Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, coastal resorts including Da Nang and Phu Quoc, and mountain areas such as Sa Pa. These locations appeal to a broad range of travellers interested in nature, culture, history, food and luxury experiences.

Tourism growth is also spreading beyond the country’s largest cities. Visitor numbers increased sharply in secondary destinations such as Phu Quoc and Sa Pa during 2025, reflecting changing travel preferences as tourists increasingly seek unique experiences and closer connections with nature.

Vietnam has supported this growth through more accessible visa policies, allowing visitors from several countries to enter without visas or remain for longer periods. The country has also invested heavily in infrastructure, including airports, hotels and international flight connections.

Vietnamese airlines have expanded services from China, Japan and Singapore, with potential future growth into European markets. These developments are designed to support long-term tourism growth rather than relying solely on natural demand.

Alongside increasing visitor numbers, Vietnam is seeking to attract higher-spending travellers who stay longer and return more frequently. Target markets include business travellers, conference and seminar groups, luxury tourists and medical tourists.

The strategy reflects lessons learned from established tourism destinations such as Thailand and Bali. Vietnam aims to avoid some of the challenges associated with mass tourism, including overcrowding, environmental pressure, rising living costs and uneven service standards.

Thailand’s experience remains particularly relevant. While Thailand has long been a leading tourism destination, the sector has faced challenges since the pandemic, including a slower recovery in Chinese arrivals, safety concerns, crime-related perceptions and ongoing debate about prioritising quality over quantity in tourism.

However, analysts note that Vietnam’s rapid expansion also carries risks. Significant investment in hotels, airports and tourism developments could create excess capacity if future visitor demand declines.

The Nation reported that the country’s long-term challenge will be balancing growth with sustainability while maintaining service quality, controlling overdevelopment and encouraging repeat visits. Success in these areas could help Vietnam establish itself as one of Asia’s leading tourism hubs while increasing competitive pressure across the ASEAN tourism market.

image.png

Picture courtesy of The Nation

Join the discussion? image.png

Already a member? image.png

image.png Adapted by ASEAN Now Nation 20 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Patong2021 Diamond Member

Patong2021

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Scouse123 said:

I have always thought an eclectic mix was the most successful blend for tourism, encompassing all people and budgets.

Nothing wrong with that either. Many backpackers who move up financially return to the countries where they had good experiences.

Patong2021 Diamond Member

Patong2021

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, D Peter said:

(Some people think it's good to get rid of backpackers, but they actually bring a LOT of income into Thailand because they stay longer and do more activities than the package tour tourists

Backpackers are a plague if you want to improve quality. And the few Baht spending at the market or 7/11 you can't address as SPENDING. Wealthy tourists don't want to be forced to mingle with filthy backpackers.

Can you back up your claim that the backpackers bring a lot of income into Thailand? Their spending activity does not support that conclusion. The rule of thumb for a backpacker is 2,000 baht/day. 30 days = 60,000 baht. Compare that to the typical punter staying at a 4* hotel like Hyatt or Marriott who stays 7 days. and spends at least 10,000 baht/day. 70-100,000 baht for a week.

And so what if a backpacker stays longer? Do you think that the hotels just rent a room for 7 days a month? The higher end hotels are near capacity in high season.

Some of the most profitable types of visitors are

  • Short term golf packages (Japan, South Korea, China and Australia/New Zealand). They come for a few days, stay in decent hotels, spend on dinners, vehicles and/or drivers, green fees & caddies.

  • Medical service contracts: The kidney, cardiac and endocrinology specialty clinics took a big hit when air service to the Gulf states was interrupted.

  • Nordic "snowbirds": One of the most profitable demographics, especially the seniors. They leave a small environmental costs, are well behaved, and spend on higher end goods and services.

  • Regional meeting and convention attendees

  • Visitors who stay at premium hotel brands

Off Piste Silver Member

Off Piste

Advanced Member
On 6/20/2026 at 9:18 AM, Keeenok Powell said:

Went back last year and was so disappointed with all the development .

You're not wrong, Phu Quoc is full to the brim of cheap fake facaded imitation European style developments, purely aimed at the Chinese market; who have absolutely no idea about authenticity. Street shows, acrobats and dancers amuse the giddy Chinese tourists with pseudo cultural entertainment....Not for me, I wish I had been there 20 years ago.................overall on the fakeness scale, 8 outa 10, just a tad under Dubai..............

Off Piste Silver Member

Off Piste

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Woke to Sounds said:

Thailand needs to offer a 6-mo 'snowbird' visa, multi-entry, applied for beforehand and non-extendable.

More farang from colder climes are choosing to do 6-month splits between home country and Se Asia rather than living full time in Se Asia.

Thailand could charge a decent (but fair) price for this visa and attract some of those going to VNam simply because it's less hassle to stay longer.

Didn't Thailand used to have a multiple entry 6 month visa..?....could swear I had a couple of those, or am I imagining it..........?

Off Piste Silver Member

Off Piste

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The actual economic data does not support you glorification of backpackers and their impact upon the economy. Can you cite any reputable economic sources for your claim or are your relying on imagined data?

I too would be very interested to see any up to date data on the different demographics, different countries and their spending/duration of stay etc.......... can anyone point me in the right direction for some half reliable data..?

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

I have always thought an eclectic mix was the most successful blend for tourism, encompassing all people and budgets.

It is. Thailand needs an eclectic mix of tourists because it is not Monaco. Thailand has a huge tourist industry with a huge, eclectic mix of tourist accommodations--from cheap hostels to expensive 5-star resorts. Thailand will always need a diverse tourist mix to fill these diverse rooms--no matter what this or that tourist spokesman is spouting this week or next.

Captain Flack Star Member

Captain Flack

Global Moderator

Social media post removed.

Rule 18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However, in factual areas such as, but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency and must include a link to the original source.

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member

The same old lame excuses blame Covid and the decline of the Chinese. What have TAT or Tourism ministers done to Encourage visitors ? They make it more difficult for you to stay longer with there Visa Regulations, European markets seeing headlines such as free exended visas for Indians, Russians, Chinese etc, there policy of lost Tourism is a signal to increase prices across the board. Our safety is unimportant and is ignored in high tourist areas such as Pattaya, Phuket, and Samui particulary Koh Tau or Death Island as its come to be known. We then see Monthly TAT fudging tourist numbers when we know its fabricating the numbers, in there mindset they think we believe them so they carry on spreading propaganda. Then we have there new PM only a few years ago he told us we were dirty unwashed and smelly tourists and we dont want you, sadly Mud Sticks. In short you cannot blame anyone for your loss you were warned Pre-Covid to change or you will suffer the Consequence's you ignored it all so now you have to live with the seeds you sowed.

D Peter Senior Member

D Peter

Member
1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

Can you back up your claim that the backpackers bring a lot of income into Thailand? Their spending activity does not support that conclusion. The rule of thumb for a backpacker is 2,000 baht/day. 30 days = 60,000 baht. Compare that to the typical punter staying at a 4* hotel like Hyatt or Marriott who stays 7 days. and spends at least 10,000 baht/day. 70-100,000 baht for a week.

And so what if a backpacker stays longer? Do you think that the hotels just rent a room for 7 days a month? The higher end hotels are near capacity in high season.

Some of the most profitable types of visitors are

  • Short term golf packages (Japan, South Korea, China and Australia/New Zealand). They come for a few days, stay in decent hotels, spend on dinners, vehicles and/or drivers, green fees & caddies.

  • Medical service contracts: The kidney, cardiac and endocrinology specialty clinics took a big hit when air service to the Gulf states was interrupted.

  • Nordic "snowbirds": One of the most profitable demographics, especially the seniors. They leave a small environmental costs, are well behaved, and spend on higher end goods and services.

  • Regional meeting and convention attendees

  • Visitors who stay at premium hotel brands

Apparently you got me wrong.

I only wrote:

Backpackers are a plague if you want to improve quality. And the few Baht spending at the market or 7/11 you can't address as SPENDING. Wealthy tourists don't want to be forced to mingle with filthy backpackers.

That implements that wealthy tourist spends a lot more than a backpacker.

Furioso Silver Member

Furioso

Advanced Member

I went to Da Nang each of the last 3 years, same time of year too. This year it was super crowded, mostly by Chinese and South Korean tourists. They acted like they own the city in I could see the Vietnamese visibly annoyed for the first time ever.

I stayed there 3 weeks but I'm not going to go back until they start restricting tourists, it was that bad.

StevieAus Gold Member

StevieAus

Advanced Member
On 6/20/2026 at 6:34 AM, Pesche said:

"...and ongoing debate about prioritising quality over quantity in tourism."

Shouldn't it rather be "prioritising quantity over quality in tourism" following the Visa-Free incentive?!

Opposite to Vietnam, Thailand does not aim at all for long stay tourism!

On the contrary, Immigration red-tape & regulations are ridiculous and make it more difficult (i.e. for retirees) to enjoy a long term stay.

Still the old mentality:

"Welcome to Thailand, come to party and shopping (spend all your money) and go home!"

I have lived in Thailand for more than 16 years without experiencing any ridiculous red tape or regulations , I know many expats in the same situation some who have lived here in excess of twenty years and longer.

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The actual economic data does not support you glorification of backpackers and their impact upon the economy. Can you cite any reputable economic sources for your claim or are your relying on imagined data? The backpackers offer little financial benefit to the overall economy which is why Vietnam has moved to quality hospitality facilities. Da Nang illustrates that with its bulldozing of the cheap hostels and building of affordable 3* and 4* hotels. A 10 storey hotel that occupies the space of a budget hostel and a few noodle shops employs more people at higher wages. It generates the tax revenue that the local government uses to pay for the road and sewage improvements. It also pays for the schools and health services. The guests of these hotels will spend much more on local goods and services than the backpackers.

You don't understand the economics you have no evidence, youreself, you are just sealioning

JT25 Senior Member

JT25

Member
2 hours ago, Furioso said:

I went to Da Nang each of the last 3 years, same time of year too. This year it was super crowded, mostly by Chinese and South Korean tourists. They acted like they own the city in I could see the Vietnamese visibly annoyed for the first time ever.

I stayed there 3 weeks but I'm not going to go back until they start restricting tourists, it was that bad.

Very similar to your situation in Da Nang.I been a few times,again last august. Never again,the noise beep beep all day and night did my head in. No traffic rules as such. Golf is good ,but the rest of it,nah. I will go back to Thaialdn from now on.

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member
39 minutes ago, StevieAus said:

I have lived in Thailand for more than 16 years without experiencing any ridiculous red tape or regulations , I know many expats in the same situation some who have lived here in excess of twenty years and longer.

I worked in Thailand for over 20 years an found the government regulation and working rights to be sadly lacking

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member

seems that most of the comments here are not based on any real evidence but more a middle-aged expat-centric perspective.

Patong2021 Diamond Member

Patong2021

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, kwilco said:

You don't understand the economics you have no evidence, youreself, you are just sealioning

Work through the math?

A multi floor mid market hotel employs many people from desk clerks, to maintenance, to kitchen staff, to chambermaids etc. It will charge 3,000-5,000 baht/night. The Thai hotel occupancy for this segment is no less than 65% annually. Backpacker facilities have lower occupancy rates (closer to 50%) and hold fewer people, and may employ 3-5 people if large enough. The hotel visitor will be consuming goods and services of higher value than the hostel backpacker visitor. Both types of visitors incur civil infrastructure costs for electricity, transport, sewage public security etc. However, the non backpacker visitor is generating greater tax revenues with which to pay for the similar use of public services.

\You are making the claim that backpackers are a profitable and important tourist segment. Fine. It is up to you to back it up with the economic data. You cannot because there is nothing to support the claim.

kwilco Ruby Member

kwilco

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Work through the math?

A multi floor mid market hotel employs many people from desk clerks, to maintenance, to kitchen staff, to chambermaids etc. It will charge 3,000-5,000 baht/night. The Thai hotel occupancy for this segment is no less than 65% annually. Backpacker facilities have lower occupancy rates (closer to 50%) and hold fewer people, and may employ 3-5 people if large enough. The hotel visitor will be consuming goods and services of higher value than the hostel backpacker visitor. Both types of visitors incur civil infrastructure costs for electricity, transport, sewage public security etc. However, the non backpacker visitor is generating greater tax revenues with which to pay for the similar use of public services.

\You are making the claim that backpackers are a profitable and important tourist segment. Fine. It is up to you to back it up with the economic data. You cannot because there is nothing to support the claim.

No, it isn't. You are now sealioning

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
12 hours ago, kwilco said:

I worked in Thailand for over 20 years an found the government regulation and working rights to be sadly lacking

So, you weren't a tourist here, which is the subject of this thread.

Thanks for trying out.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member

The primary statistic in the OP is a surge in the number of Chinese tourist arrivals in Vietnam. It's the only metric offered.

Then follows 3 pages of nostalgia about visas, Thaksin, backpackers, snowbirds, etc. A fair bit of this irrelevant comment is coming from members who lambast the Chinese tourist in Thailand and pillory the Thai government for trying to boost their numbers.

Canadian Snowbird Senior Member

Canadian Snowbird

Member
17 hours ago, Off Piste said:

Didn't Thailand used to have a multiple entry 6 month visa..?....could swear I had a couple of those, or am I imagining it..........?

And they still do. Its called a multi-entry tourist visa (METV), which is good for a maximum of 180 days, but you only get 60 days when you arrive, then either have to leave the country then come back to activate the next 60 days, or extend for 30 days, then leave the country and come back to activate the next 60 days. Having to leave the country is actually encouraging people to spend time in other nearby countries like Vietnam.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
On 6/20/2026 at 6:57 PM, Scouse123 said:

Vietnam doesn't do the flip-flopping that Thailand does, it sets policies and sticks to them.

Not hard to do in a communist country.

jacko45k Star Member

jacko45k

Advanced Member
20 hours ago, D Peter said:

(Some people think it's good to get rid of backpackers, but they actually bring a LOT of income into Thailand because they stay longer and do more activities than the package tour tourists

Backpackers are a plague if you want to improve quality. And the few Baht spending at the market or 7/11 you can't address as SPENDING. Wealthy tourists don't want to be forced to mingle with filthy backpackers.

Those guys are a nuisance, all that luggage and bumpibg their packs into you at luggage reclaim.

Point Arguello Explorer Member

Point Arguello

Advanced Member

20% increase tourist numbers for year! With compound interest formula:21million(1+.2)^3=36million. In three years

Scouse123 Ruby Member

Scouse123

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, emptypockets said:

Not hard to do in a communist country.

You are right, but at least we all know where we stand one week to the next.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member

I don't think Thailand should be considered down for the count just yet. It still has lots to attract both wealthy and low-budget tourists. Bangkok is one of the most popular tourist cities in the world. It has many 5 star hotels, one of the most vibrant, glittering, shopping experiences, and has a few very popular Buddhist temples and other cultural venues to visit. There are many islands and beaches that have not yet been ruined by overdevelopment. But it still needs the low budget tourists. They drive a billion dollar accommodation, food and beverage sector, and entertainment industry. Does it matter if you have 1,000 tourists spending 900 baht per night but only 200 spending 5,000 baht per night? It works out roughly the same, but the higher number of low end tourists are eating in small Thai restaurants or on the street eating noodles, etc. They provide a livelihood for millions of Thai families. So in summary, the well off tourists that come to Thailand and stay and eat in the hotels owned by the oligarchs make the latter richer. The low end tourists provide an income for millions of smaller players. Thailand will always need both groups.

LittleBear57 Advanced Member

LittleBear57

Member
On 6/20/2026 at 9:43 AM, ronnie50 said:

I love Vietnam. The one thing I did notice is it's a bit of a pain for money exchange. You can do it at the airport but rates not so good. In Da Nang, the banks were hit and miss. Some would exchange, some would not. Gold shops are recommended but it seems a bit disorganized and dodgy.

On 6/20/2026 at 9:43 AM, ronnie50 said:

I love Vietnam. The one thing I did notice is it's a bit of a pain for money exchange. You can do it at the airport but rates not so good. In Da Nang, the banks were hit and miss. Some would exchange, some would not. Gold shops are recommended but it seems a bit disorganized and dodgy.

I totally agree with this statement. Different Atms allow different amount s you can withdraw and charge different fees. However I would recommend downloading the app ATM fee saver as it will give the amounts different charge and indicate where the best are located. Some are free in Vietnam unlike Thailand where every bank will rip you off, about 5 quid at the moment I believe then your Uk bank will take a chunk too.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, LittleBear57 said:

I totally agree with this statement. Different Atms allow different amount s you can withdraw and charge different fees. However I would recommend downloading the app ATM fee saver as it will give the amounts different charge and indicate where the best are located. Some are free in Vietnam unlike Thailand where every bank will rip you off, about 5 quid at the moment I believe then your Uk bank will take a chunk too.

Better to take USD cash and exchange. Use VN Dong as much as possible. Maybe CC for hotels or expensive meals. Be careful with Dong as the 10,000 and 100,000 look very similar. There was an old scam where the waiter would pick up the tab from the table and return a moment later claiming you gave a 10,000 Dong note instead of 100,000.

Shocked farang Silver Member

Shocked farang

Advanced Member
On 6/19/2026 at 11:59 PM, Sir Dude said:

It's inevitable that Vietnam will surpass Thailand in most areas and it can be boiled down to the general attitude of the people... Thais are nowhere near as focused and determined to succeed like the Viets are.

This is one thing you immediately notice upon arrival in Vietnam, coming from Thailand: These people have a drive. They are not laid back at all.

Woke to Sounds Gold Member

Woke to Sounds

Advanced Member
On 6/20/2026 at 8:50 PM, Off Piste said:

You're not wrong, Phu Quoc is full to the brim of cheap fake facaded imitation European style developments, purely aimed at the Chinese market; who have absolutely no idea about authenticity.

Even 10 yrs ago Phu Quoc had aspirations to be like this, unfortunately.

Not worth a trip for me now despite the excellent pepper, landscapes/views and island airport.

Woke to Sounds Gold Member

Woke to Sounds

Advanced Member
On 6/20/2026 at 10:20 PM, Furioso said:

I went to Da Nang each of the last 3 years, same time of year too. This year it was super crowded, mostly by Chinese and South Korean tourists. They acted like they own the city in I could see the Vietnamese visibly annoyed for the first time ever.

I stayed there 3 weeks but I'm not going to go back until they start restricting tourists, it was that bad.

Been there many times over the years and each time it becomes less appealing. (like Prague and Bali)

The noise has become a 24/7 assault on the senses, not to mention the annoying package tourists clogging the beach paths. And don't forget the UFC bros in drunken fights at the pubs.

The nature and sea is fantastic though, and the only reason I keep going back! 😅

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.