Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Pattaya firms raided in foreign nominee probe

Thai authorities have searched three locations in Pattaya and Bang Lamung as part of an investigation into suspected Thai nominee arrangements used to hold land and run businesses for foreigners.

The operation on 21 August was led by Deputy Interior Minister Waris Leangprasert and Justice Minister Police Lieutenant General Rutthaphon Naowarat. It involved the Department of Provincial Administration's (DÒPA) special operations unit, the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) and police.

Search warrants were issued by the Criminal Court under the Foreign Business Act 1999. The investigation centres on suspected use of Thai nationals as proxy shareholders in companies said to be ultimately controlled by foreigners.

The authorities said the inquiry followed earlier checks on Koh Phangan and Koh Samui in Surat Thani, and Phuket.

Three Pattaya targets searched

Investigators searched the KT International Law and Business office, in Soi Post Office, Pattaya Beach Soi 13, in Pattaya, which they suspect handled the registration of Cozy Beach View Co Ltd.

IMG_0850.png

Officials alleged that staff from the law office had been named as shareholders on behalf of the company's real foreign owners. Documents and other evidence were seized for further examination.

The second target was Shilat Avenue Pattaya hotel, off Soi Buakhao, another legal entity which used the same law office for company registration. Investigators said employees of the office were named among the company's founders.

A deeper check reportedly found changes to the shareholder list linked to Lotus Paradise Development Co Ltd. Authorities also identified a shareholder with work history in the aluminium sales business in Samut Sakhon, which they said pointed to a complex nominee network involving several legal entities.

The third target was Cozy Beach View Co Ltd in Nong Prue, Bang Lamung. Authorities said an Israeli investor was a company director and that its shareholder structure appeared to have used Thai nationals as nominees since 2010.

Officials said there were significant director and shareholder links between Cozy Beach View and Lotus Paradise Development. The companies were said to have combined assets worth several hundred million baht.

What foreign investors should know

The raid is a reminder that foreign nationals cannot simply use Thai friends, employees or service providers to bypass restrictions on land ownership or business activities reserved for Thais.

Thailand's Foreign Business Act regulates foreign participation in a range of businesses. Using Thai nominees to conceal foreign control can expose all involved parties - including foreign investors, Thai shareholders and advisers - to investigation.

Authorities said the searches were conducted under court warrants to secure business documents and electronic communications. Computer equipment and documents were seized and frozen for forensic examination.

Waris said the Interior Ministry would work closely with the DSI to identify everyone involved and would enforce the law strictly. The officials stressed that the investigation remains focused on gathering evidence to establish relationships and conduct within the suspected network.

IMG_0851.png

Pictures courtesy of Matichon

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

22 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

riverhigh Silver Member

riverhigh

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, jippytum said:

Suprising recent Thailand business crackdown seem to be identifing more Isralies than Chineese

Most probably because Israelis have been in Thailand longer than the Chinese. From the article most of these Thai nominee businesses were set up decades ago when Thailand was looking for foreign investment and willing to turn a blind eye. The law existed then but not enforced.

riverhigh Silver Member

riverhigh

Advanced Member
51 minutes ago, Gandtee said:

I wonder who ordered this crackdown? The man who said, "Smelly farangs."?

No the next-door Thai competitor. Nothing personal just business.

TheFishman1 Platinum Member

TheFishman1

Advanced Member

The Thai LAWYER Thai accountant how come they’re never prosecuted they’re the ones setting everything up isn’t it weird why did the police go after the LAWYER oh I forgot this is Thailand T

TimBKK Gold Member

TimBKK

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, JerryM said:

If some of these property arrangements are that old, they may have a difficult time going after the ancillary players due to statute of limitations.

I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think statute of limitations comes into play for ongoing concerns, even those set up decades ago.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Gandtee said:

Maybe if all the foreign owners? and nominees are found guilty of breaking Thai Law, and establishments are closed down, Pattaya will become a ghost town. What happens to the Thai Tourist Authority and its projected tourist visits? 'Oh. We never thought of that. It's all a misunderstanding.'

Ahhhh, the old "The Thai's would never do that, they would lose too much money" saying.

They don't care. It's money today, don't worry about tomorrow.

"Returning Thai land to Thai people" 🙂

geisha Platinum Member

geisha

Advanced Member

Suprising recent Thailand business crackdown seem to be identifing more Isralies than Chineese

Yes, news everywhere of an Israeli invasion. What is happening , where is this going? Even FB is full on all the groupes of this problem. And who are these people who are running lots of businesses , hotels, mostly online from outside of Thailand , employing zero Thais, and a key system operating on a code and online payment system. With no benefit to Thailand.

The illegal no licence shool having 80 kids attending sounds troubling to myself.

J Branche Gold Member

J Branche

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Gandtee said:

Maybe if all the foreign owners? and nominees are found guilty of breaking Thai Law, and establishments are closed down, Pattaya will become a ghost town.

No it would make it easier to transform Pattaya into a Family Friendly destination.

Or the businesses would just be more consolidated, ie busier and since that would benefit the Thai businesses I'm sure they have no problem with this.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)
1 hour ago, TimBKK said:

I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think statute of limitations comes into play for ongoing concerns, even those set up decades ago.

Why would you presume the lawyers involvement is ongoing.

The criminal code on limitations references the date that the crime was committed which is setting up the nominee arrangement.

Edited by JerryM

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

To the above: And even if they need a lawyer for ongoing reasons, that is not necessarily the same lawyer who set it up.

TimBKK Gold Member

TimBKK

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, JerryM said:

Why would you presume the lawyers involvement is ongoing.

The criminal code on limitations references the date that the crime was committed which is setting up the nominee arrangement.

Much like you presume the lawyer’s involvement is not ongoing - if I needed subsequent help with my nominee set up, not a stretch to presume the same lawyer wouldn’t be used again and again.

If we presume no involvement beyond the initial setup, there may still be legal grounds to argue that the initial assistance enabled a continuing crime and is thus not subject to statute of limitations.

Who knows though? What the law says and how it is applied and enforced here is anyone’s guess, especially in this morass.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, TimBKK said:

Much like you presume the lawyer’s involvement is not ongoing - if I needed subsequent help with my nominee set up, not a stretch to presume the same lawyer wouldn’t be used again and again.

If we presume no involvement beyond the initial setup, there may still be legal grounds to argue that the initial assistance enabled a continuing crime and is thus not subject to statute of limitations.

Who knows though? What the law says and how it is applied and enforced here is anyone’s guess, especially in this morass.

There is statute language and hypotheticals. You can deal with the latter.

Sir Dude Gold Member

Sir Dude

Advanced Member

Okay, it's fine to enforce the law, but the Thai lawyers that signed off on it and arranged it, knowing their misdeeds, need to be brought to account and charged too as they broke the law as well... this one-sided action leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Come on Thailand, apply the law equally, please... or lose confidence in so many sections. So many of your own are errant too on this one.

TimBKK Gold Member

TimBKK

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, JerryM said:

There is statute language and hypotheticals. You can deal with the latter.

I’ve dealt with both and am fine having done so.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member

The lawyers likely not doing anything illegal.

Captain Flack Star Member

Captain Flack

Global Moderator

Off topic post discussing gender of someone in the picture. @Gknrd this is the news section, discuss the topic - “Pattaya firms raided in foreign nominee probe”

L- Lifeline Silver Member

L- Lifeline

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, Brettoj said:

Good, getting the local law firms who arranged these agreements!

I agree- and let us not forget the accountants involved as well

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, L- Lifeline said:

I agree- and let us not forget the accountants involved as well

Why do you assume the accountants are breaking the law?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, L- Lifeline said:

Simply on the basis if they are helping set up the nominee company they are clearly implicated

Setting up companies and keeping books is not illegal.

It would have to be proven that the bookkeeper knows that they are participating in an ongoing illegal activity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.