Thai Court Blocks British Tycoon’s Children From Funeral

8 hours ago, kingstonkid said:

It may be but the outcome as I have stated was the correct one. We have all heard of kids tht were sent on legal visitation that disappeared or were not sent back. Once things are settled and I think it will take a while, then part of the settlement could be that the estate provides the mom and kids the money to go to his gravesite.

The mother will not need the estate to provide money !!! She’s more than likely got quite a few million $ of her own now. She’ll have lawyers and her family helping her.

6 hours ago, kingstonkid said:

The court does not need proof that it will happen they in this case need legal proof that it will not happen. Also remember that children must be accompanied by either mom or dad and int hecase of a divorce Mom must agree. The Thai coulrt simply is saying we think there is a good chance that the UK family will try to ge them to stay and will add this to the estate divorce proceedings

LL

Simple Thai officials in the UK have about the same power to make things happen there as the UK Embassy here does

You did not understand my comment, try reading it again, this time slowly, and in context to what I commented on.

18 hours ago, scorecard said:

And if the Thai court sent Thai oficials to accompany the children the UK courts would have no power to make any form of order (in regard to the 2 Thai officials) in regard to their movements / activiies / authority over the children whilst in the UK.

And in the UK, if the UK resident members of the farang;s family said 'children cannot leave the uk, the Thai officials would have no authority to phyiscally remove the children and bring them back to Thailand.

On 5/30/2026 at 5:35 AM, Georgealbert said:

Look beyond the fake smile, this woman is a wrongun......the eyes, the look, the masquerade.

19 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How does his probable suicide detract from Pattaya being a safe family location?

Nobody believes it was a suicide!

20 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Not if it gives rise to suspicion that not providing that very straightforward information might be deliberately obstructing the case.

Fair comment, Lou. I didn't think that far ahead!

Well, his wife would be sole living direct guardian as these were her kids, and that gave her the power to block them going to UK without her (I assume the kids had UK passports but their mother did not and would need a visa and not enough time to get one). Seems to me the UK relatives had many (even financial personal) reasons to take the kids to UK for the funeral - and potentially not return them to Thailand and their mother. A custody dispute is a moot point with their father's death.

Too many oddities in this story, like the fact the British adult son (half brother) didn't know the details about the funeral. I think the judge's order was sensibile, though pitiful for the young Thai-British kids.

6 hours ago, BritManToo said:

ou said:

How does his probable suicide detract from Pattaya being a safe family location?

Nobody believes it was a suicide

Really? Where's that been reported?

6 hours ago, scorecard said:

On 5/30/2026 at 12:35 PM, scorecard said:

And if the Thai court sent Thai oficials to accompany the children the UK courts would have no power to make any form of order (in regard to the 2 Thai officials) in regard to their movements / activiies / authority over the children whilst in the UK.

And in the UK, if the UK resident members of the farang;s family said 'children cannot leave the uk, the Thai officials would have no authority to phyiscally remove the children and bring them back to Thailand

There are no Thai officials that have authority over the children (without a court order).

6 hours ago, Off Piste said:

Look beyond the fake smile, this woman is a wrongun......the eyes, the look, the masquerade.

....the ridiculous, unfounded speculation.

7 hours ago, BritManToo said:

On 5/30/2026 at 11:09 AM, Liverpool Lou said:

How does his probable suicide detract from Pattaya being a safe family location?

Nobody believes it was a suicide

Really? Where was that reported?

What was reported was that he had been alone in the condo in which he lived alone, that it was locked from the inside and that CCTV showed that no one else entered the room.

13 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Really? Where was that reported?

What was reported was that he had been alone in the condo in which he lived alone, that it was locked from the inside and that CCTV showed that no one else entered the room.

Nothing in Pattaya is trustworthy.

People like this guy in his sort of position don't just "fall" from the top of a building or die from "accidents" in such convenient circumstances for some others. He was wealthy and successful, plus it would be easy for him to move on from his ex... all smells of those stories you hear about in Russia etc. where some business guy that said the wrong thing at some point having a "boating accident" etc. The smell of manure over this case is strong.

As for the Thai court and judge... there was no way the outcome could have been any different and was decided before anyone did anything, so predictable. They clearly want this case to go away but are simply going through the motions to make it look slightly credible.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Really? Where was that reported?

Nothing in Pattaya is trustworthy

Are you in the Pattaya area?

On 5/30/2026 at 11:21 AM, Legal Lifeline said:

Another sad twist in what is clearly a bitter fight- and no doubt the root cause is who gets what from the deceased mans estate

You are overlooking the fraud and forgery for which he was convicted and jailed, do you not think that could be the root cause?

On 5/30/2026 at 6:25 PM, Aussie999 said:

You did not understand my comment, try reading it again, this time slowly, and in context to what I commented on.

still do not see anything against my previous.