Have the police searched her home yet, just to confim she isn't there? Did they look under the bed and in the wardrobe?

4 hours ago, LannaGuy said:

 

Fugitives but not from justice as commonly thought "justice" by developed countries  

 

The somewhat unique nature of the justice system here may make it very different to the justice system in other countries.

 

However, that doesn't mean Thaksin and Yingluck are innocent either.

8 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

The somewhat unique nature of the justice system here may make it very different to the justice system in other countries.

However, that doesn't mean Thaksin and Yingluck are innocent either.

Not a big fan of "innocent until proven guilty" then are we?

26 minutes ago, champers said:

Have the police searched her home yet, just to confim she isn't there? Did they look under the bed and in the wardrobe?

or in the back garden?

18 minutes ago, Father Fintan Stack said:

Is that the same Abhisit that had Thailand's most corrupt politician (by party member's own admission) and Surat Thani gangster overlord as deputy PM?

 

The same Abhisit who's mentor Chuan Leekpai's brother embezzled billions and fled to Taiwan until the statute of limitations expired on his crimes.

 

Is that the same guy? 

 

well if you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas

8 hours ago, webfact said:

Abhisit said, adding that the international community would ask Thailand to explain why she had fled the country.

 

The government should establish whether the issue was political or criminal, or the country’s judicial system would be in jeopardy, Abhisit said.

what is this guy smoking ?! if i ever meet this 'international community' , my bet is they will ask the person who knows, yingluck, not some bunch of truth-benders

8 hours ago, webfact said:

POLICE yesterday confirmed they had found evidence that former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra had fled the country

Wow, what a brave step. However, I like it when the cops reveal insight to their secrets and results of their hard work gained in hundreds of hours overtime.

22 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:

or in the back garden?

Most convincing evidence: she didn't take her umbrella when she was leaving the house. So she must have left for the desert.

An off topic post has been removed.

This whole situation and the whopping lies that surround it are so transparent its pathetic.  Total contempt of court and that is not limited to her non appearance but all who assisted.  Disgraceful.

5 hours ago, phuketrichard said:

she will be back next year with her brother once they are pardoned and they can ask her
" how did you get out of Thailand with our secure borders"?

 

'next year', 'pardoned', how's that?

its called Mr. T is close friends with  xxxxxx

I'll take any and all bets

2 hours ago, JingerBen said:

 

For sure.

Abhisit, in spite of his occasional blundering is head and shoulders above most of the others.

Oh look mum! The Abhisit glee club are having a party!!!

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

The somewhat unique nature of the justice system here may make it very different to the justice system in other countries.

 

However, that doesn't mean Thaksin and Yingluck are innocent either.

This afternoon's "But Thaksin! But Thaksin!" post brought to you by...

Just now, NanLaew said:

This afternoon's "But Thaksin! But Thaksin!" post brought to you by...

 

And today's silliest response - congratulations!

 

Did you miss that this post was about Yingluck, the poster I replied to commenting on why she, and possibly her brother by connection, may have fled?

 

But perhaps you think your response is new and not a repetitive much used attempt to stifle any inconvenient mention of criminals?

58 minutes ago, Father Fintan Stack said:

Is that the same Abhisit that had Thailand's most corrupt politician (by party member's own admission) and Surat Thani gangster overlord as deputy PM?

 

The same Abhisit who's mentor Chuan Leekpai's brother embezzled billions and fled to Taiwan until the statute of limitations expired on his crimes.

 

Is that the same guy? 

 

 

How many crimes has the person you refer to been convicted of?

 

Ah, just another semantic perhaps?

59 minutes ago, pornprong said:

Not a big fan of "innocent until proven guilty" then are we?

 

Well Thaksin has been convicted, jumped bail and sentenced in absentia. And of course has 15 or so serious cases outstanding.

 

Yingluck has chosen, seemingly, to do a runner before any verdict. In most minds that does tend to suggest she and her legal team think a guilty verdict probable. And of course, based on the evidence produced, that would seem a correct conclusion.

 

I

 

An off topic post has been removed. 

1 hour ago, Father Fintan Stack said:

To be fair, it is hard to have a balanced view when you are consumed with an obsession of the Shinawatras.

 

Or an obsession that the Shins are completely innocent, of everything for ever, as some posters like to pretend.

19 minutes ago, scorecard said:

 

'next year', 'pardoned', how's that?

Well guess you should get out more and read that which is not censored. Education is wonderful for those that do not have a closed mind.

7 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

How many crimes has the person you refer to been convicted of?

Says more about the state of the judiciary than anything else.

5 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

How many crimes has the person you refer to been convicted of?

 

Ah, just another semantic perhaps?

Now THAT is today's silliest response by a mile. No need to qualify it further as I bow to your superiority in matters of posting silliness.

Just now, pornprong said:

Says more about the state of the judiciary than anything else.

 

So you have actual evidence?

 

Or are you saying ALL politicians, regardless of affiliations, which some change to suit the times, take advantage?

3 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

Yingluck has chosen, seemingly, to do a runner before any verdict. In most minds that does tend to suggest she and her legal team think a guilty verdict probable.

Even a blind man and his 3-legged dog in Nakhon Nowhere had the guilty verdict sussed out already.

3 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

Well Thaksin has been convicted, jumped bail and sentenced in absentia. And of course has 15 or so serious cases outstanding.

Q1. Convicted by who and for what?

A1. Convicted by corrupted courts on made up charges.

 

3 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

Yingluck has chosen, seemingly, to do a runner before any verdict. In most minds that does tend to suggest she and her legal team think a guilty verdict probable. And of course, based on the evidence produced, that would seem a correct conclusion.

Q2. Why did Yingluck flee?

A2. See A1 above.

 

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

Now THAT is today's silliest response by a mile. No need to qualify it further as I bow to your superiority in matters of posting silliness.

 

That's right. You simply know in your mind that all you Shin huggers and lovers, simply instinctively know that Thakisn and his clan are innocent as the day is long. Why he even said so himself on CNN, and he never lies does he?

 

And all those who dare oppose this benevolent honest very moral clan must be guilty of all sorts of crimes, even though never convicted and should be sent to prison for eternity.

 

The deluded world of the Shin fan posters! And they can't even understand why few believe them.

3 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Even a blind man and his 3-legged dog in Nakhon Nowhere had the guilty verdict sussed out already.

 

Don't insult blind people by suggesting they lack intelligence - it's demonstrating prejudice.

 

Anyone who read the reports of the case evidence, anyone that is with an ounce of intelligence and without bias, would find it hard to see how any verdict but guilty to the charges was inevitable.

 

Or would you like to explain why you think she was innocent?

 

 

6 minutes ago, pornprong said:

Q1. Convicted by who and for what?

A1. Convicted by corrupted courts on made up charges.

 

Q2. Why did Yingluck flee?

A2. See A1 above.

 

 

Ah it's the new boy prolific Shin defender. Hello!

 

Even Thaksin admitted the circumstances regarding the abuse of power that led to his conviction. He never denied illegal signing of documents. There was an attempt to bribe the judges though.

 

Made up charges - please explain your comment; or apologies for trying to post something that isn't true.

 

Corrupt Court - how so? If they were corrupt they'd have take the bribe. They didn't.

 

12 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

That's right. You simply know in your mind that all you Shin huggers and lovers, simply instinctively know that Thakisn and his clan are innocent as the day is long. Why he even said so himself on CNN, and he never lies does he?

By western standards, Thaksin would of course be guilty of many things, but by Thai standards he is no criminal. This probably explains why the only conviction against him is the inane land purchase farce where he was declared to be a "defect" supervisor of the FIDF even when the law clearly stated the Pm was not the Supervisor of the FIDF.

 

Hold them all accountable to the same standards - lock them all up, both sides or lock none of them up. 

 

Quote

And all those who dare oppose this benevolent honest very moral clan must be guilty of all sorts of crimes, even though never convicted and should be sent to prison for eternity.

Whoever said anything of the like?

 

Quote

The deluded world of the Shin fan posters! And they can't even understand why few believe them.

The only delusions here are by those who need to create a demon to justify their own beliefs and views. 

Without the facade of opposing super-villain Thaksin and his devilish clan, all that's left is garden variety fascism.

(this is why every post is a constant regurgitation of "red crimes" - without the fantasies, you have nothing)

Edited September 5, 20178 yr by pornprong

4 minutes ago, pornprong said:

By western standards, Thaksin would of course be guilty of many things, but by Thai standards he is no criminal. This probably explains why the only conviction against him is the inane land purchase farce where he was declared to be a "defect" supervisor of the FIDF even when the law clearly stated the Pm was not the Supervisor of the FIDF.

 

Hold them all accountable to the same standards - lock them all up, both sides or lock none of them up. 

 

Whoever said anything of the like?

 

The only delusions here are by those who need to create a demon to justify their own beliefs and views. 

Without the facade of opposing super-villain Thaksin and his devilish clan, all that's left is garden variety fascism.

(this is why every post is a constant regurgitation of "red crimes" - without the fantasies, you have nothing)

 

Drivel.

 

Other than yes, all corruption should be punished not just a selected few.

 

In the West, any PM who fiddled a land deal so his missus could by it cheap, way below market price, and the quickly sell it for a killing would be in trouble, very much so.

 

Again, you seem to say, well lots are corrupt, so that make it all ok. No it doesn't.

 

Perhaps you thin there's no case to answer in the Krungthai Bank Fraud case too?