Jip99 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Becker said: Now, now, calm down. Never a good idea to hit the Chang so early in the morning. Just out of curiosity, what exactly could Thailand "hit back" with? Should they refuse to export their seafood perhaps? .... or rice....... that would be a killer stroke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon789561 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 7 minutes ago, Jip99 said: .... or rice....... that would be a killer stroke! and chicken. they need them for there microwave meals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overherebc Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, wakeupplease said: Is this a new law in the UK then, reporting every 3 months? No mate in a civilise country they do not have laws like that now do they. Even if it was required then she would just get a lacky to do it, jus' like wot I do, Jon. Anyway with all the reports I see/read about the UK and the EU the word asylum fits in there nicely. Edited October 11, 2017 by overherebc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon789561 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 still no pics of yingluck out shopping. she's doing well to stay low key. kind of missing her now 555 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quadperfect Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 18 hours ago, wakeupplease said: So if she has been granted asylum which at this time is just speculation, what are they going to do, (1)invade the UK with the new subs? (2)Tell all Brits to leave. (3) Do nothing as the UK would kick our ass if we tried. There is not a thing they could do is there, Maybe call trump and ask him to help, but again we know the answer there. So time to shut up and move on. Yea exactly .if she has asylum it just shows a first world country operates with respect to freedomes and puts more egg in the face of this already covered junta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron19 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 A number of off topic posts have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Kasset Tak said: If she is granted asylum in UK then I hope Thailand respond with something! UK is to blame about much that is wrong in this region, the law that foreigners can't own land in Thailand is there basically because of UK and France were "stealing" parts of what was then Siam. That is just one shining example on how UK <deleted> the world in the past... the same way that US keeps <deleted> the world today! A balanced view, a chip on both shoulders... Edited October 11, 2017 by JAG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxcorrigan Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) What we do without the odd grammar ferret jumping out of the woodwork to put a wrong to rights, bravo! In answer to baboon "sigh" Edited October 11, 2017 by maxcorrigan more info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Real Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) 20 hours ago, MickTurator said: Maybe if they sent a forensic team to UK they could DNA test all the seats in the Foreign Office to check Send a forensic team!? What did you say?? Forensic technology? What is that? Is it something new? We really have to look in to this. Oh! It´s used when a crime happens. And you say that you can establish cause of death, and the identity of the perpetrator. That´s great! I guess we will try and use that to see if it works next time something happens. Edited October 11, 2017 by Get Real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike324 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 Why would YIngluck need asylum when she can easily obtain diplomatic passports from various nations and travel the world freely like Thaksin. Heck she most likely already has a foreign passport given that her brother could guide her through the process. You can buy almost anything with money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) It would be doubtful if the UK or its member countries would even reply for an extradition order on Yingluk , their dislike dealing with Junta's is well recorded, claiming asylum, hmm doubtful................................. Edited October 11, 2017 by chainarong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgdanson Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 21 hours ago, vogie said: She will soon want to return to Thailand when she starts her 3 monthly reporting in the UK. Same as we do here ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 5 hours ago, Kasset Tak said: If she is granted asylum in UK then I hope Thailand respond with something! UK is to blame about much that is wrong in this region, the law that foreigners can't own land in Thailand is there basically because of UK and France were "stealing" parts of what was then Siam. That is just one shining example on how UK <deleted> the world in the past... the same way that US keeps <deleted> the world today! As JAG so accurately stated, you have a chip on both shoulders or maybe one chip and French Fry. IMO, the British and French left Siam alone as a buffer zone between their Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam possessions and Burma and Malaya under British control as well as eventually Singapore.None of these countries would be where they are today without some colonial influence, just look at India and how advanced they are given their massive population. In the opinion of many, a bit of colonial input into Siam/Thailand might have put it further ahead today than it is. H.M.Rama V , King Chulalongkorn knew this, although he maintained strong independence from colonization but looked to the British in India for ways to improve his administration. A great king indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 1 hour ago, mike324 said: Why would YIngluck need asylum when she can easily obtain diplomatic passports from various nations and travel the world freely like Thaksin. Heck she most likely already has a foreign passport given that her brother could guide her through the process. You can buy almost anything with money. Asylum means a protected status, which will be recognised internationally. Having the cash to buy passports is jolly useful, but by the nature of things a country which will sell you citizenship is just as likely to take it away, and less likely or able to extend you it's protection internationally. Political asylum from HMs Government is, however much you may dislike the wicked English, internationally rather more "copper-bottomed". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 1 hour ago, ratcatcher said: As JAG so accurately stated, you have a chip on both shoulders or maybe one chip and French Fry. IMO, the British and French left Siam alone as a buffer zone between their Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam possessions and Burma and Malaya under British control as well as eventually Singapore.None of these countries would be where they are today without some colonial influence, just look at India and how advanced they are given their massive population. In the opinion of many, a bit of colonial input into Siam/Thailand might have put it further ahead today than it is. H.M.Rama V , King Chulalongkorn knew this, although he maintained strong independence from colonization but looked to the British in India for ways to improve his administration. A great king indeed. Interesting. I posted essentially identical information, but mine apparently was removed as "off topic". Maybe because I agreed in the last sentence that the US, my birth nation, is a bit of a problem on the world stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thian Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 55555 Loh Linn krab. (Good joke). I don't believe it but if it's true i won't buy any Brittish products from now on... so no more uhhh uhhh....help, i can't remember to see "made in the UK" on any product i bought last years 55555. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike324 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 22 hours ago, JAG said: Asylum means a protected status, which will be recognised internationally. Having the cash to buy passports is jolly useful, but by the nature of things a country which will sell you citizenship is just as likely to take it away, and less likely or able to extend you it's protection internationally. Political asylum from HMs Government is, however much you may dislike the wicked English, internationally rather more "copper-bottomed". The thing is that countries that will sell you citizenship won't just take it away, case in point. Thaksin with at least two diplomatic passports. It would be very hard for a country to take away a diplomatic passport once its issued, unless they receive enormous pressure from a country and interpol, but its highly unlikely especially with a country like Thailand which doesn't have much clout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakeupplease Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) On 10/11/2017 at 5:36 AM, Kasset Tak said: If she is granted asylum in UK then I hope Thailand respond with something! UK is to blame about much that is wrong in this region, the law that foreigners can't own land in Thailand is there basically because of UK and France were "stealing" parts of what was then Siam. That is just one shining example on how UK <deleted> the world in the past... the same way that US keeps <deleted> the world today! thanks for your insight, which institution do you attend. If she is granted asylum in UK then I hope Thailand respond with something! bullS>>t is the only thing in their arsenal, the tanks and subs would say in port for sure I don't believe it but if it's true i won't buy any Brittish products from now on... so no more uhhh uhhh....help, i can't remember to see "made in the UK" on any product i bought last years 55555. just hope the British do not stop buying the rice and seafood and all the Thai restaurants in the UK are closed due to customers also not buying Thai, my god the TAX fiddles and cash from them will stop coming here also not to mention the import tax loaded against British goods. Why not just wait and see if she applied, Time will tell Edited October 12, 2017 by wakeupplease Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now