Airlines get ready for new U.S. security rules from Thursday

[webfact]

Airlines get ready for new U.S. security rules from Thursday

By David Shepardson and Jamie Freed

 

People wait for flights in advance of the incoming travel ban to the U.S. at John F. Kennedy airport in the Queens borough of New York City, New York, U.S. June 29, 2017. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/Files

 

WASHINGTON/TAIPEI (Reuters) - New security measures including stricter passenger screening take effect on Thursday on all U.S.-bound flights to comply with government requirements aimed at responding to threats of hidden explosives, airlines said.

 

Airlines contacted by Reuters said the new measures could include short security interviews with passengers at check-in or the boarding gate, sparking concerns over flight delays and extended processing time.

 

They will affect 325,000 airline passengers on about 2,100 commercial flights arriving daily in the United States, on 180 airlines from 280 airports in 105 countries.

 

U.S. Transportation Security Administration officials are giving some airlines or airports additional time to comply with the new interviews as long the U.S. government has approved security plans by Thursday.

 

"TSA will continue to work closely with our aviation partners and verify that all security enhancements are accurately implemented," TSA spokeswoman Lucy Martinez said in a statement Wednesday.

 

The United States announced the new rules in June to end its restrictions on carry-on electronic devices on planes coming from 10 airports in eight countries in the Middle East and North Africa in response to concerns that explosives could be hidden in electronic devices.

 

Those restrictions were lifted in July, but the Trump administration said it could reimpose measures on a case by case basis if airlines and airports did not boost security.

 

European and U.S. officials said at the time that airlines had 120 days to comply with the measures, including increased passenger screening. The 120-day deadline is Thursday. Airlines had until late July to expand explosive trace detection testing.

 

"We see this as a big issue for China Airlines," Steve Chang, senior vice president of the Taiwanese firm told reporters on Wednesday, adding the airline was trying to consult with the American Institute in the country over the issue.

 

Korean Airlines, South Korea's flagship carrier, also said it had a lot of concerns with the new measures.

 

"We are asking customers to show up at the airport early ... It's just inconvenient for the passengers," President and Chief Operating Officer Walter Cho told Reuters in Taipei.

 

Lufthansa Group said on Tuesday the measures would be in place by Thursday and travelers could face short interviews at check-in or at the gate.

 

Economy passengers on Lufthansa's Swiss airline have been asked to check in at least 90 minutes before departure.

 

Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd said it would suspend in-town check-in and self bag-drop services for passengers booked on direct flights to the United States. The airline said passengers would also have short security interviews and it has advised travelers to arrive three hours before departure.

 

Singapore Airlines Ltd said the security checks could include inspections of personal electronic devices as well as security questioning during check-in and boarding.

 

Airlines for America, a U.S. trade group, said the changes "are complex security measures" but praised U.S. officials for giving airlines flexibility in meeting the new rules.

 

Alexandre de Juniac, CEO of the International Air Transport Association, said the industry understood security threats to aviation were made regularly but in this case the U.S. government had not shared any specific dangers before changing the rules.

 

"What we have seen is very strange," he told reporters in Taipei. "Unilateral measures announced without any prior consultation... That is something that is very concerning and disturbing."

 

At their annual meeting in Taipei, Association of Asia Pacific Airlines (AAPA) members passed a resolution calling for security measures to be risk-based, outcome-focused and proportionate to the probable threat.

 

"Unilateral actions taken by individual governments reacting to emerging threats may result in unnecessary disruption or lead to unintended safety consequences," said the members.

 

AAPA includes most large Asian airlines but not mainland Chinese carriers.

 

"The risk is other countries make similar demands," AAPA Director General Andrew Herdman said.

 

U.S. authorities in June also ordered increased security around aircraft and in passenger areas, and other places where travelers can be cleared by U.S. officials before they depart and ordered enhanced screening of personal electronic devices. Some of those new requirements take effect this week as well.

 

The TSA said in July it was imposing new security rules requiring U.S. domestic airline travelers to remove all electronic items larger than mobile phones such as tablets, e-readers and video game consoles from carry-on baggage for screening.

 

(Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington and Jamie Freed in Taipei; Additional reporting by Victoria Bryan in Berlin; Editing by Mark Potter and Cynthia Osterman)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-10-27

[sandrabbit]

This will mean less passengers flying any US airlines transiting through the US as the security is bad enough now without new rules.

[Rhys]

Anyway is no way with the TSA agents with micro reproductive organs and IQs above any 45 C holster special.

 

[puck2]

China is going to be more likeable, day by day - at least at the ports of arrival.

Procedure  and treatment -  a real horror in the USA.

 

Before 9/11 they arrogantly didn't worry about security, now they learned a little bit from "1984" ( Big-Brother).

[Jonmarleesco]

Airlines suggesting different check-in periods, ranging from 90 minutes to twice that; differing procedures at check-in, dependent on airline, etc. It would be much more effective and less time consuming if the airlines got together and came up with a common and cohesive policy. 

[mrfill]

1 hour ago, Jonmarleesco said:

Airlines suggesting different check-in periods, ranging from 90 minutes to twice that; differing procedures at check-in, dependent on airline, etc. It would be much more effective and less time consuming if the airlines got together and came up with a common and cohesive policy. 

The airlines could do that but it would have to be acceptable to ALL countries, from the least worried to the most paranoid, and that is where the sticking point is. The whole world would need to turn paranoid and I'm not sure that's such a good idea.

[Rancid]

As much as I like the US I don't have any need to fly there these days, seems I'll be missing all the new joys of US air travel.

[ncc1701d]

Tsa trying to make their jobs relevant.

[tryasimight]

Offer a ham sandwich at check in. Refusal to eat means refusal to board.  That would take care of 99% of the problem. 

[Machiavelli]

A Malawian has more freedom than an American. Went to Malawi last year on a research project. They don't scanners at the airport. No need. 

[stevenl]

4 hours ago, tryasimight said:

Offer a ham sandwich at check in. Refusal to eat means refusal to board.  That would take care of 99% of the problem. 

That's it, refuse those pesky vegetarians.

[ilostmypassword]

4 hours ago, tryasimight said:

Offer a ham sandwich at check in. Refusal to eat means refusal to board.  That would take care of 99% of the problem. 

 

47 minutes ago, stevenl said:

That's it, refuse those pesky vegetarians.

And cut back on Israeli tourism.

[tryasimight]

On 10/28/2017 at 10:24 PM, ilostmypassword said:

 

And cut back on Israeli tourism.

who cares?