boomerangutang Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 23 hours ago, amvet said: You did know that another American President dropped two atomic bombs and everybody clapped? Truman is as different from Trump, in character, as Jimmy Carter and Mussolini. I don't completely agree with the US dropping 2 A-bombs on Japan in the manner they did. Hindsight is 20-20, but I would have advised it differently. For starters, the US only had 2 A-bombs at that time (though it indicated to the Japs that it had many more). I think the US should have picked a remote Japanese island and bombed it. It would have shown the devastation possible. At that time, the US ruled the Japanese skies, and the Japs knew it. They knew the US could bomb anywhere at any time - even Tokyo and the Emperor's compounds. If not a remote island, then perhaps purely military or military-manufacturing target(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 hours ago, CaptHaddock said: It was believed in the past that sub commanders must have had authority to launch nuclear missiles since radio communication with submerged subs was either unreliable or impossible, depending on who you spoke to. Whether current radio technology permits underwater communication is an interesting question. It does. And has done so for quite a considerable time via very long wave radio signal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Dumbastheycome said: It does. And has done so for quite a considerable time via very long wave radio signal. Well, you're not dumb-as-they-come, after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptHaddock Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said: It does. And has done so for quite a considerable time via very long wave radio signal. Years ago I read an article about radio communications with subs that said that ELF communications require a very long antenna, at the time 1.5 miles of copper, towed behind the sub. Just now I see Wikipedia reports that a sub can receive ELF, but cannot house its own transmitter, so that communication is incoming only. Sounds problematical to me. I wonder if the sub commanders still have nuke launch authority. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarines#Extremely_low_frequency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 hour ago, CaptHaddock said: Years ago I read an article about radio communications with subs that said that ELF communications require a very long antenna, at the time 1.5 miles of copper, towed behind the sub. Just now I see Wikipedia reports that a sub can receive ELF, but cannot house its own transmitter, so that communication is incoming only. Sounds problematical to me. I wonder if the sub commanders still have nuke launch authority. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarines#Extremely_low_frequency Incoming coded signal to launch is enough for any meglomaniac's satisfaction ! No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 hour ago, boomerangutang said: Well, you're not dumb-as-they-come, after all. The truth is that "we" collectively try to avoid any description. And the "you" that people presume to know is not even present. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Off-topic post removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 22 hours ago, Dumbastheycome said: The truth is that "we" collectively try to avoid any description. And the "you" that people presume to know is not even present. lol I don't presume to completely understand your note. However, I've had a notion that a person who uses the pronoun 'we' is either a Siamese twin, or the Queen of England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MyEgo Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 On 19/11/2017 at 2:12 PM, pgrahmm said: All the General really said was a discussion of options & scenarios would have to be brought forward..... This happens routinely & does not mean either man is walking away from the respnsibilities or consequences..... The power to strike with nuclear force should be taken away from one single person and be debated before congress before a 75% vote agrees that a strike is imminent, i.e. the US is under fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, boomerangutang said: I don't presume to completely understand your note. However, I've had a notion that a person who uses the pronoun 'we' is either a Siamese twin, or the Queen of England. lol. Then you missed another more social alternative . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrwebb8825 Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 13 hours ago, 4MyEgo said: The power to strike with nuclear force should be taken away from one single person and be debated before congress before a 75% vote agrees that a strike is imminent, i.e. the US is under fire You DO understand that there is a 6 minute window to retaliate before the 2nd wave comes, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 13 hours ago, 4MyEgo said: The power to strike with nuclear force should be taken away from one single person and be debated before congress before a 75% vote agrees that a strike is imminent, i.e. the US is under fire Yes, give it to a 535-member congress that only meets during weekdays during normal business hours - only when in session. But a great target for leadership decapitation! And if the congressional majority is not the same party as the POTUS, "Don't call us. we'll call you." And if there is a congressional split between/among parties, "Don't call us. we'll call you." All the while an imminent ICBM strike might be as short as 7 minutes from offshore submarines and about 40 minutes from mainland North Korea to Washington D.C. "Duck & Cover" won't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MyEgo Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 2 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said: You DO understand that there is a 6 minute window to retaliate before the 2nd wave comes, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MyEgo Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Srikcir said: Yes, give it to a 535-member congress that only meets during weekdays during normal business hours - only when in session. But a great target for leadership decapitation! And if the congressional majority is not the same party as the POTUS, "Don't call us. we'll call you." And if there is a congressional split between/among parties, "Don't call us. we'll call you." All the while an imminent ICBM strike might be as short as 7 minutes from offshore submarines and about 40 minutes from mainland North Korea to Washington D.C. "Duck & Cover" won't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now