Jump to content

Court allows ‘We Walk’ protest to proceed


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Court allows ‘We Walk’ protest to proceed

By The Nation

 

0b0e9a31f00c5f2c949eb9a6ee2c6c38.jpeg

Photo from People Go Network Facebook page

 

The activists on the “We Walk” mark have been granted the temporary protection under an Administrative Court order, so they can continue their peaceful campaign without interference from the police.

 

The Administrative Court on Friday issued a court order to the Royal Thai Police to facilitate members of People GO Network to carry on their long march from Thammasart University to Khon Kaen. The order says police should refrain from conducting any operation against the exercise of freedom of expression by the activists until the end of the march on February 17.

 

The court ordered the police to follow their duty as per the Article 19 of the Public Gathering Act to provide security, manage traffic and ensure the protest will follow the law and is peacefully arranged.

 

However, police still reserve the right to ask the court to cancel the protest and to issue other enforcement if the protesters violate the laws.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30337294

 

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-01-27
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, tropo said:

Does he answer to courts? Doesn't Article 44 give him powers above the court? 

Does he dare use his Article 44 powers? Seems that the Thai people are getting bolder and the Junta is getting nervous.

 

I sincerely hope that nobody in the present government decides to flex their muscles. A peaceful end to this military rule is still possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We Walk march on after legal victory

By PRATCH RUJIVANAROM 
THE SUNDAY NATION

 

aab9ea2f13465ef435a8c567ac64c8d2-sld.jpeg

 

ADMINISTRATIVE COURT GRANTS NETWORK CONDITIONAL PROTECTION TO PROTEST

 

The human rights campaigners of the “We Walk” long march may have won a legal battle for the rest of their protest, but it is still not a guaranteed protection against the National Council for Peace and Order’s (NCPO) ban on political demonstration.

 

The Administrative Court issued an order on Friday night granting legal protection for the People GO Network to continue their long march from Thammasat University to Khon Kaen and also ordered the police to perform their duty according to the Public Gathering Act to provide the security the demonstrators needed until the march ends on February 17.

 

Environmental Litigation and Advocacy for Wants Foundation (EnLaw) secretary-general Surachai Throngngam said yesterday that the court order helped to reduce pressure on the campaigners, as they had earlier faced frequent intimidation and obstructionist behaviour by police officers since the start of the long march on January 20.

 

“Not only does the Administrative Court’s order obligate the Royal Thai Police and the regional police on the way to Khon Kaen to facilitate the marchers, but it is also legal assurance that the march is legal as per the Public Gathering Act,” Surachai said.

 

The court ordered the police to follow their duty as per Article 19 of the Public Gathering Act to provide security, manage traffic and ensure the protest follows the law and is peacefully arranged.

However, police still reserve the right to ask the court to cancel the protest and to issue other enforcement if the protesters violate the laws.

 

Despite the court verdict being of great relief to many of those involved in the march, Surachai cautioned that it only ordered the police, who were the defendants in the case, to follow court instructions. It did not, he said, provide the protesters with protection from military officers, who may accuse the protesters of violating the NCPO order 3/2558.

 

Earlier, a military officer had filed a complaint against eight participants of the march for breaching the junta’s order by gathering more than five people to stage a political protest and they were summoned to report to Klong Luang Police today.

 

“Nevertheless, this court’s order can be an important proof that our demonstration is the rightful exercise of our freedom of expression and is legally staged as per the Public Gathering Act. I believe that the military officers also respect this court’s order,” Surachai noted.

 

Pol Maj-General Thakoon Natthisri, Provincial Police Region 4 deputy commander, said the police acknowledged the court’s order and gave assurances that officers would provide good care and security for the protesters when they reach the area under his responsibility.

 

“Nevertheless, we want to ask the protesters to refrain from disturbing other people and breaking the law, and we will make sure that the protest has minimal effect on other people and that there will be no interference from any third party to cause chaos,” Thakoon said.

 

As of yesterday, People GO Network had stopped their march in Nakhon Ratchasima to arrange a public discussion about the state welfare system and the problems with the Universal Health Coverage scheme.

 

Meanwhile, at Songkhla’s Hat Yai District, public organisations in the South gathered in a parallel demonstration under the same name, “We Walk”, from the Hat Yai clock tower to Sena Narong military camp.

 

Dr Suphat Hasuwankit, one of the marchers in the South, reported that a large police force had been deployed to stop the march, but they successfully negotiated for it to continue to Sena Narong military camp to hand the military a petition urging support for freedom of expression.

 

In Bangkok, the People Go Network Forum led by Kasetsart University lecturer Decharut Sukkumnoed will arrange a march at Lumphini Park every evening from today until February 17 to show support for the main campaign to Khon Kaen.

 

People GO Network was the consolidation of various public organisations and launched the We Walk campaign to walk the 450 kilometres from Pathum Thani to Khon Kaen in order to raise public awareness on state welfare, universal healthcare, food security, community rights and environment protection, and political rights and democracy.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30337308

 

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-01-28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article about the US/Europe view of the Thai elections.

 

The US and Europe are visibly ratcheting up pressure on Thailand in 2018. Elections following the 2014 coup have been repeatedly pushed back, primarily because the cause of the coup, Thaksin Shinwatra and the immense power, influence and impunity he enjoys, has yet to be removed from Thailand’s political landscape making real free and fair elections an impossibility. For Washington, no election that even remotely puts Shinawatra and his Pheu Thai Party at a disadvantage will be recognised as “free and fair.”
 

Full Article: https://journal-neo.org/2018/01/27/new-year-new-turmoil-as-us-targets-thailand/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

so the courts are running the police ? how screwed up is that ?

It is not screwed up. It is the police who are screwed up. The peaceful protestors are complying with the law by walking in groups of three. A group of five is the maximum allowed by law. The court has ruled in their favour and reminding the police that while they continue the way they are then they should leave them alone.

To quote:

"....police still reserve the right to ask the court to cancel the protest and issue other enforcement if the protestors violate the laws".

 

Edited by Cadbury
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YetAnother said:

so the courts are running the police ? how screwed up is that ?

 

Both are part of the justice system. The words "order" and 'demand' are often used in these types of articles, translated from the Thai. Whereas I suspect the Thai version would use much more polite words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"However, police still reserve the right to ask the court to cancel the protest and to issue other enforcement if the protesters violate the laws."

 

Seems innocuous. But I would still not trust the RTP (or the Government) NOT to interfere, or try and then ask the Court to back their decision. :post-4641-1156693976:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...