Jump to content

Brexit has created chaos in Britain – nobody voted for this


webfact

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Nonsense, I challenge you to name a more centralist UK paper, I would put money on you failing to be able to.

If you think the Independent is centralist it would be pointless trying to convince you otherwise.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh right on!!  It's not like the Brexit King Pin Boris Johnson was a remainer!.....  Oh dear, not only was he a keen remainer but he wrote many newspaper  articles explaining about the folly of leaving the EU.  According to your argument then, we can thank god that he ran away from the opportunity of being PM.  Still, clearly the May agenda was to keep any Brexiteers at arms length.  Probably silly to make Johnson FS and appoint passionate Brexiteer Davis in charge of negotiations.    Get it yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Hakapalita put up a just picture of Enoch then Kieran wrote about 10 lines of erroneous rubbish underneath it! 

 

Then why have you only succeed to counter one detail of just one point?  Is it because you can't and the best you had were blind guesses that have already been exposed as being incorrect?

Edited by Kieran00001
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Then why have you only succeed to counter one detail of just one point?  Is it because you can't and the best you had were blind guesses that have already been exposed as being incorrect?

You only put one point and that was wrong. The rest was just your own opinion of Powell. Here:

 

Powell spent his first 11 years as an MP condoning free immigration for the Commonwealth, he was questioned on it in 1956 and stated that he was against putting any control on immigration.  While he was Minister of Health he oversaw recruitment drives in the West Indies that brought the NHS staff.  In his campaign in the 1964 election he said, “I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin,”.  Then he stood for leader of the Tory party and lost, and lost badly, and it was then that he started voicing a racist opinion, to try to win some votes, you would have to have been a fool to have fallen for Powell's game, he was just a slimy politician. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

Yeh right on!!  It's not like the Brexit King Pin Boris Johnson was a remainer!.....  Oh dear, not only was he a keen remainer but he wrote many newspaper  articles explaining about the folly of leaving the EU.  According to your argument then, we can thank god that he ran away from the opportunity of being PM.  Still, clearly the May agenda was to keep any Brexiteers at arms length.  Probably silly to make Johnson FS and appoint passionate Brexiteer Davis in charge of negotiations.    Get it yet?

To Quote Ian Dunt

"We said it at the time and it remains true now: the greatest obstacle to Brexit is the quality of the people advocating for it."

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tebee said:

To Quote Ian Dunt

"We said it at the time and it remains true now: the greatest obstacle to Brexit is the quality of the people advocating for it."

Looks like a misspelling. :smile:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

So you can't name a more centralist paper then?

I assume you mean centrist, rather than centralist?

In any case, tell me how centrist (or centralist if you prefer) the Independent is exactly, then I'll find you a competitor.

Just for fun I'll say The Daily Mail is more centrist than the Independent - let's see if you can prove otherwise.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tebee said:

An article about why we are getting such a cr*p deal - apart from our negotiators being useless.

 

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/the-true-reason-britain-cannot-call-europes-bluff

This mess was foretold in the 'Good Book' ......'Now hear this, O foolish and senseless people, Who have eyes but do not see; Who have ears but do not hear. Let them speak no more.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

You only put one point and that was wrong. The rest was just your own opinion of Powell. Here:

 

Powell spent his first 11 years as an MP condoning free immigration for the Commonwealth, he was questioned on it in 1956 and stated that he was against putting any control on immigration.  While he was Minister of Health he oversaw recruitment drives in the West Indies that brought the NHS staff.  In his campaign in the 1964 election he said, “I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin,”.  Then he stood for leader of the Tory party and lost, and lost badly, and it was then that he started voicing a racist opinion, to try to win some votes, you would have to have been a fool to have fallen for Powell's game, he was just a slimy politician. 

In the Birmingham Speech he reiterated the commitment against treating British citizens differently based on the nationality or country of origin of their parents. 

 

2 hours ago, nontabury said:

And why is a crap deal being negotiated? Could it be due to the fact that the person surrendering to the Brussels Bureaucrats, is T May, a person who voted to remain in this so called union. In contrast to the British people who did not vote to remain in.  They did not vote for a so called soft Brexit, what they did vote for was:-

 

 

 

 

E80EF9B3-9D92-44D9-9B4A-2581BDC1F42A.jpeg

I reckon we should get unemployed people from Grimsby to negotiate the Brexit deal, and let the government concentrate on running the country.  If they haven’t reached a satisfactory arrangement, pass it over to the people of Swansea to have a go, and so on ad nauseam, if that has not already been reached

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nauseus said:

You only put one point and that was wrong. The rest was just your own opinion of Powell. Here:

 

Powell spent his first 11 years as an MP condoning free immigration for the Commonwealth, he was questioned on it in 1956 and stated that he was against putting any control on immigration.  While he was Minister of Health he oversaw recruitment drives in the West Indies that brought the NHS staff.  In his campaign in the 1964 election he said, “I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin,”.  Then he stood for leader of the Tory party and lost, and lost badly, and it was then that he started voicing a racist opinion, to try to win some votes, you would have to have been a fool to have fallen for Powell's game, he was just a slimy politician. 

 

Hardly, him being questioned on immigration in 1956 and the view he gave is one, him as minister of health overseeing the recruitment drives that brought Indian and West Indian NHS staff is another, that one was off admittedly, anyway that is the second point, what he said in the 1964 campaign was the third, him losing in the leadership election was the fourth and only the fifth is my opinion, an opinion formed on the previous four points. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

I assume you mean centrist, rather than centralist?

In any case, tell me how centrist (or centralist if you prefer) the Independent is exactly, then I'll find you a competitor.

Just for fun I'll say The Daily Mail is more centrist than the Independent - let's see if you can prove otherwise.

 

There's an easy test, find two people who are on the hard side of their political leaning, one on the left and one on the right, ask them what they like, the lefty wont like the Mail, the righty won't like the Guardian, but ask them about the Independent and neither will like it, there's no other paper in the UK that is so consistently unappealing to both the hard right and the hard left, therefor it is the most *centrist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Hardly, him being questioned on immigration in 1956 and the view he gave is one, him as minister of health overseeing the recruitment drives that brought Indian and West Indian NHS staff is another, that one was off admittedly, anyway that is the second point, what he said in the 1964 campaign was the third, him losing in the leadership election was the fourth and only the fifth is my opinion, an opinion formed on the previous four points. 

It seems to me he took a pragmatic approach depending on his responsibilities.  As  Minister for Health, he did his best for the health service; as an MP he reported and spoke in accordance with the views of his constituents.  “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”

Edited by StreetCowboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StreetCowboy said:

It seems to me he took a pragmatic approach depending on his responsibilities.  As  Minister for Health, he did his best for the health service; as an MP he reported and spoke in accordance with the views of his constituents.  “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds”

 

 Tell that to the thalidomide sufferers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Orac said:

Seems Daniel Hannan isn’t to happy - of course it is everybody else who is at fault.

https://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2018/05/daniel-hannan-for-partisan-advantage-labour-demands-a-worst-of-all-worlds-brexit.html


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

Stop grizling and govern.  If you can’t govern, let someone else do the job.  The British people betrayed themselves by electing the current government in a manifesto to deliver Brexit when it was clear that few people really wanted it, and now they have little choice but to plunge over the cliff that they have chosen.  In the long run, I’m sure it will be fine, and I am hopeful my children will live to see that day

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, StreetCowboy said:

Stop grizling and govern.  If you can’t govern, let someone else do the job.  The British people betrayed themselves by electing the current government in a manifesto to deliver Brexit when it was clear that few people really wanted it, and now they have little choice but to plunge over the cliff that they have chosen.  In the long run, I’m sure it will be fine, and I am hopeful my children will live to see that day

Hannan is an MEP. No real power to govern.

 

Your comment about the British people is strange. Should they have voted Labour?

Edited by nauseus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, tebee said:

To Quote Ian Dunt

"We said it at the time and it remains true now: the greatest obstacle to Brexit is the quality of the people advocating for it."

 

This guy is brilliant; Listen!

 

We would get on great, what with me being a total Celt!

 

All we need is JRM to join us ?

Edited by Grouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, StreetCowboy said:

You’ll need to explain that to me.  

 

His actions when the effects of Thalidomide became known point to him not doing his best for the health service while Minister of Health.

 

Quote

As minister of health from 1960 to 1963, Powell said no to a public inquiry into the origins of the Distaval (thalidomide) atrocity and no to every request made by a delegation of affected parents in January 1963. Powell said no to immediately setting up a drug-testing centre, as “anyone taking an aspirin puts himself at risk”. He refused to even set eyes on a thalidomide child. He said no to giving a statement afterwards: “no need to bring the press into this”.

Perhaps most damningly, Powell said no to a public warning against using any of the pills that might still be in medicine cabinets – “a scaremonger publicity stunt”. The drug was never banned; just withdrawn for further tests. Many more babies were born needlessly affected by the drug precisely because there were pills still on pharmacists’ shelves being dispensed – in family medicine cabinets and even in drawers in doctors’ surgeries.

“Powell’s intransigence left the families with only one remedy, to sue the manufacturers for negligence,” wrote Harold Evans in My Paper Chase, his autobiography. We now know what that meant in effect. Distillers’ lawyers were able to drag their heels for 10 years until Evans and his Insight team at the Sunday Times broke the story to the British public. The parents were victims as much as their children, and many broke under the strain of the long wait for compensation. Distillers eventually settled, but out of court.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/11/it-isnt-just-racism-that-should-bar-enoch-powell-from-a-blue-plaque

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...