Jump to content

Brexit has created chaos in Britain – nobody voted for this


webfact

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, transam said:

Don't understand why folk here keep quoting what a newspaper writes, when  a newspaper column is usually written by a a bloke, one bloke with an opinion.

There's a difference between a newspaper offering an opinion on a subject and a columnist who specialises in particular field, personally, I avoid the former like the plaque. Usually, the specialist journalist who is writing a  column is somebody who has researched the subject matter and/or is sufficiently qualified, educationally and experience-wise, to offer an informed opinion. All of those things mean that the average reader doesn't have to spend several years in education, several more years gaining experience and several more years in research to get to the same point of understanding on a topic. The foregoing is particularly true of economics journalists such as Jeremy Warner, Liam Hallagan and Roger Bootle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transam said:

Don't understand why folk here keep quoting what a newspaper writes, when  a newspaper column is usually written by a a bloke, one bloke with an opinion.

It stimulates debate as seems to be the case now doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, transam said:

Don't understand why folk here keep quoting what a newspaper writes, when  a newspaper column is usually written by a a bloke, one bloke with an opinion.

Which is why, where possible, I post HMGs updates instead of waiting for the media-spun version.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

People who use the words "biased" and Balanced" seem in reality to lack true reading/comprehension skills.

Comprehension of anything worth reading involves listening to an opinion, my experience is that if a rather benighted or uninformed mind  agrees they call it "balanced" and if they don't they call it "biased", this helps those who can't actually formulate a coherent opinion or argument of their own.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Airbagwill said:

 

 

People who use the words "biased" and Balanced" seem in reality to lack true reading/comprehension skills.

Comprehension of anything worth reading involves listening to an opinion, my experience is that if a rather benighted or uninformed mind  agrees they call it "balanced" and if they don't they call it "biased", this helps those who can't actually formulate a coherent opinion or argument of their own.

 

 

Some papers only show facts that bolster one sides opinion, they are biased, others show facts that bolster both sides of the arguments opinion, they are balanced, why would you expect a reader to be able to form an opinion from biased data?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Grouse said:

I've just been awarded 4 "confused" by Dundee 44 on this topic; I infer he's a Brexiter?

You clearly have no standing in his eyes, I have recorded details of eighty-seven of them that he's awarded to me and before long I'm going to dump them on the moderators with a case that he's in violation of Forum Rule 7 governing stalking, so keep it up Dundee, keep it up. :shock1:

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Some papers only show facts that bolster one sides opinion, they are biased, others show facts that bolster both sides of the arguments opinion, they are balanced, why would you expect a reader to be able to form an opinion from biased data?

QED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StreetCowboy said:

There's no forum rule against being easily confused.  Some of the moderators would struggle... (I can see me taking a doubledecker bus to Greece for that comment)

Being easily confused or even clinically sad is a given with many posters in this debate, the eighty-seven however are neither of those things. But it's a special sense of humour I hear you say..........indeed it is, indeed it is!

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khun Han said:

 

How pathetic. You'll also have to report the remain posters who also "stalk" you by reading all your posts and awarding you lots of likes and thanks, of course.

I don't HAVE to do diddly squat! 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course we only have the media's word for it that a committee meeting even took place.

 

"The committee’s Labour chair Hilary Benn said the divisions demonstrated just how difficult achieving an agreement on Brexit will be."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-committee-transition-period-hilary-benn-jacob-rees-mogg-a8261081.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Shh, Grouse will get jealous! :smile:

BTW I think it's perfectly OK for active posters to click emoticons as and when they see fit, I think however that extensive emoticon clicking alone, in lieu of ever posting, indicates a very disturbed state, sick puppy territory in fact.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...