Jump to content

Parents of killed activist demand Army hand over video


webfact

Recommended Posts

Parents of killed activist demand Army hand over video

By PRATCH RUJIVANAROM 
THE NATION

 

017a4f25f1326f0f44ff4481ed4c7ec4.jpeg

 

THE LAWYER for the family of young Lahu activist Chaiyaphum Pasae, who was shot dead by soldiers at a military checkpoint in March last year, has petitioned the Army to hand over video footage from the scene.

 

The surveillance footage – the most important evidence in the case – has not been handed to investigators and is still missing from the case.

 

Lawyer Ratsada Manuratsada yesterday handed over a petition addressed to Army Commander-in-Chief General Chalermchai Sitthisart requesting he hand over the footage.

 

“I come to Royal Thai Army Headquarters today on the behalf of Chaiyaphum’s mother to ask for the disclosure of the CCTV footage as per her right to information under the Official Information Act,” Ratsada told the Army chief’s secretary, Maj-General Panatat Kanjanawasit, who promised to pass on the petition to his boss.

 

e7dbd09c5203d487f0bd4eab06746dba.jpeg

 

“We also urge the Army to disclose this prime evidence to the public, as it will not only clear up the ambiguities in this case and help the family, but also benefit the Army and defendants by showing if Chaiyaphum was really trying to fight the soldiers.” 

 

The Army claims soldiers shot Chaiyaphum, 17, in self-defence.

 

Ratsada said the Army had also promised to instruct the 3rd Army’s Pha Muang Task Force to hand over the footage to Chaiyaphum’s family soon.

 

Chaiyaphum was shot dead by a soldier at a military checkpoint in Ban Rin Luang of Chiang Mai’s Chiang Dao District on March 17, 2017.

 

The soldier later claimed that Chaiyaphum had tried to throw a grenade. Surveillance cameras were operating at the checkpoint at the time of the killing. Neither the investigating officers nor Chaiyaphum’s family have |seen the footage from the scene, as the hard disk initially handed over by the Army was found to be empty.

 

Lacking this crucial evidence, the Chiang Mai Provincial Court on June 6 ruled that Chaiyaphum was shot dead by the soldier, but did not touch on the reason for the killing.

 

Ratsada said Chaiyaphum’s family was still suffering and felt justice had not been served due to the vague nature of the investigation of their son’s killing. 

 

They would continue to pursue justice for their son, the lawyer said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30348053

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-06-19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Ratsada said the Army had also promised to instruct the 3rd Army’s Pha Muang Task Force to hand over the footage to Chaiyaphum’s family soon.

Somehow if the video does come out, it is doubtful it will be unedited for national security reasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Fighting the soldiers  or throwing a grenade, a little difference in language used, 

in the act of throwing so the pin was pulled ? We never heard about the maimed victims from the blast, or did some one catch the grenade and put the pin back in.

(movie fantasy)

 

Grieving for ever this looks  like for the family,

some really bad things happen here and this one,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leeneeds said:

 Fighting the soldiers  or throwing a grenade, a little difference in language used, 

in the act of throwing so the pin was pulled ? We never heard about the maimed victims from the blast, or did some one catch the grenade and put the pin back in.

(movie fantasy)

 

Grieving for ever this looks  like for the family,

some really bad things happen here and this one,

Quite right, leeneeds. Did it explode? If so, was any shrapnel presented.

 

On another point, Thai courts seem to have huge powers to hold people in contempt. You can be held in contempt for criticizing them. Presumably, the courts could have simply ordered the army to hand over the evidence. Or would that be too impolite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, YetAnother said:

the judiciary,  in their own way affirming the army is above the law

 

The judiciary doing what it's paid to do.

 

On a related topic, I gather from the newspapers that so far from the Doi Suthep houses being demolished and the area reforested, judiciary and staff staff have actually started to move in.

 

So much for that toseer Prayuth then. Caught out in another lie

Edited by KiwiKiwi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tomta said:

Quite right, leeneeds. Did it explode? If so, was any shrapnel presented.

 

On another point, Thai courts seem to have huge powers to hold people in contempt. You can be held in contempt for criticizing them. Presumably, the courts could have simply ordered the army to hand over the evidence. Or would that be too impolite?

Only if they were prepared to go against what the government instructed. That isn't going to happen.

 

Still, this case is yet more petrol on the fire. With any luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""