Jump to content

Fleeing Thaksin hit with second arrest warrant


webfact

Recommended Posts

Fleeing Thaksin hit with second arrest warrant

By The Nation

 

c65e080017368ee4d75decd0eed26ecd.jpeg

File photo : Thaksin

 

Court rules former PM can be tried in absentia over multibillionbaht loan

 

THE SUPREME Court has issued a new warrant for the arrest of former premier Thaksin Shinawatra over a 2015 criminal case stemming from a multibillion-baht loan granted by state-owned Krung Thai Bank to Krisada Mahanakorn Group.

 

Under the new law, the court is empowered to conduct a trial with defendants in absentia. Thaksin lives abroad.

 

Thaksin and 26 other persons had been accused of wrongdoing in the case. Judges have so far handed down multiple jail terms for other defendants, including former senior executives of Krung Thai Bank, but the trial involving Thaksin was suspended due to his absence.

 

Representatives of the Office of the Attorney-General were in court yesterday to pursue its lawsuit against the former prime minister, who is alleged to have abused his power while in office in the early 2000s to facilitate the state-owned bank’s multibillion-baht loan to the real-estate group resulting in financial damage to the bank.

 

Among senior executives already convicted in the case is Viroj Nualkhae, the bank’s former chief executive.

 

Under the new law, authorities are empowered to arrest Thaksin based on the court-approved warrant. In the event that the defendant doesn’t show up at court within three months, the court is empowered to proceed with the trial in absentia.

 

However, the defendant still has the right to legal representation at the trial and the right to later show up and fight the case in court.

 

Public prosecutors are required to submit monthly reports to the court regarding the status of the defendant, while the next court session is scheduled for September 26 this year.

 

Thaksin is also named in an arrest warrant in another case, in which he is charged with abusing his power while in office to favour his family-owned telecom business by converting concession fees into an excise tax.

 

Thaksin, who was prime minister from 2001 to 2006, fled the country following the 2006 coup.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30348234

 

thenation_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-06-21
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is their way of telling Thaksin to satay away and never come back, coz if you will we have this pile of indictments against you, and unless his party proxy party will win the election and a pardon/amnesty will be given to him, he better soon to learn speak arabic, because there's not much use for Thai where he is or going...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, moto77 said:

Excellent comment. ^This is pretty much all that needs be said on this topic.

Perhaps they think that next year when we may have an elected government here again, Interpol will switch back on again, arrest him and deport him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Deerhunter said:

Perhaps they think that next year when we may have an elected government here again, Interpol will switch back on again, arrest him and deport him.

Well that would be dumb, but... yeah maybe. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jip99 said:

 

 

You do know that he FLED from Thailand........ that was a fairly accurate action verb.

Sauntered out, taking his time from the NAAFI clock would be a better description...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The collection of Warrants is almost same size as the infamous Watch collection??                                                                                         When will NCPO actually get The Puppeteer & his Puppet back to face justice!!                                                                                                Guess Interpol will issue another Blue Notice; a Red Notice not any time soon????

Pathetic!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JAG said:

Do criminal acts include plotting a coup, colluding at preventing entirely lawful and constitutional elections, and then seizing power in a coup and subsequently governing by a military junta?

 

Just curious to know how you see that...

We are talking about a government pursuing a criminal. Even if this government might be criminal - they are government and a government has to pursue criminals whatever you think about them

 

 

"... plotting a coup ..."

Don't forget thaksin's failed coup in 2010. Do you think he (and his family clan) is any better than the military. He just used another strategy  more subtle and vicious  to steal power ( and riches)

Edited by sweatalot
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...