Pheu Thai’s outspoken Pichai summoned by police

[webfact]

Pheu Thai’s outspoken Pichai summoned by police

By Thai PBS

 

 

Pichai Naripthaphan, a former energy minister and a member of the Pheu Thai Party’s economic team, has been summoned to report to the Technology Crime Suppression Division (TCSD) police tomorrow.

 

Mr Pichai said that he received a TCSD summons on Wednesday morning. The TCSD issued the summons on July 26 after receiving a complaint from Col Burin Thongprapai, a legal officer of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), accusing him of posting a false statement on the computer in a way that may cause damage to national security and economy or panic among the people.

 

He said so far he has received 11 summonses. Eight were NCPO summonses for him to undergo an “attitude adjustment” session and the three others were from police on various charges. Following the 7th summons, he was detained for seven days, Mr Pichai said.

 

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/pheu-thais-outspoken-pichai-summonsed-by-police/

 

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2018-08-01

[holy cow cm]

Attitude adjustment. Next step brain washing? 

[pornprong]

Champion!

(been hit with the ugly stick a few too many times though).

[robblok]

If the PTP wins and IF they do the following as stated in the article

 

If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.

 

Then they would have my full support on that issue, too bad they never want to do the same with the defamation laws. Now that would be a great improvement. Too bad they too like that law a lot.

[rebo]

Toad's brother ...?

 

[Bluespunk]

“If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.”

 

Yeah, right...sure you will. 

[pornprong]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

“If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.”

 

Yeah, right...sure you will. 

Yeah, you keep your faith in the generals and see how that works out.

[Small Joke]

46 minutes ago, holy cow cm said:

Attitude adjustment. Next step brain washing? 

Next step?  Er, that's been going on here since forever.

Mind you, any nation that insists grade schoolers pledge allegiance to an ideal,  good,  bad or indifferent, is also guilty. 

[Chassa]

Thaksin was right again, Pheu Thai are in the firing line.

[Baerboxer]

40 minutes ago, robblok said:

If the PTP wins and IF they do the following as stated in the article

 

If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.

 

Then they would have my full support on that issue, too bad they never want to do the same with the defamation laws. Now that would be a great improvement. Too bad they too like that law a lot.

 

If you remember, when in power, they talked about it being illegal to criticize them on social media, and even illegal to like a post that was deemed critical. A Pol Gen Pisit IIRC made the announcement. But they backed down quickly. 

 

The only changes they'd make would be ones to benefit themselves.

[Baerboxer]

1 minute ago, Chassa said:

Thaksin was right again, Pheu Thai are in the firing line.

 

Of course. As they're owned and rules by a criminal fugitive who openly dictates policy contrary to the law they are going to be. 

[Baerboxer]

8 minutes ago, pornprong said:

Yeah, you keep your faith in the generals and see how that works out.

 

Deflect. deflect, deflect.

[Small Joke]

11 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

“If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.”

 

Yeah, right...sure you will. 

Agreed.  States almost never relinquish this sort of power once it's in law. 

[robblok]

2 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

If you remember, when in power, they talked about it being illegal to criticize them on social media, and even illegal to like a post that was deemed critical. A Pol Gen Pisit IIRC made the announcement. But they backed down quickly. 

 

The only changes they'd make would be ones to benefit themselves.

Yes that is what i suspect, the PTP is not known for its freedom of speech either. That is why i said IF.. first have to see it then ill believe it. But i certainly wont hold my breath. 

[robblok]

11 minutes ago, pornprong said:

Yeah, you keep your faith in the generals and see how that works out.

Care to take a bet with me to see if they amend this or not. If not you promise to remove your red glasses ? I will fully support any move they make on that front. But if they were so concerned about freedom of speech why have then never touched the defamation laws. These are normally only used against the poor.

 

So I would really like it if they amended this I would support them on that issue.. but I don't think they will, its more likely they will use it to go after their enemies, just like the junta does. 

[Bluespunk]

19 minutes ago, pornprong said:

Yeah, you keep your faith in the generals and see how that works out.

Just because I don’t believe anything PT says, doesn’t mean I support the current regime. 

 

Far from it. 

 

Check my posting history if you are in doubt. 

Edited August 1, 2018 by Bluespunk

[Bluespunk]

6 minutes ago, Small Joke said:

Agreed.  States almost never relinquish this sort of power once it's in law. 

Hmm...not quite what I meant.

 

I assume sarcasm on your part. 

[robblok]

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Just because I don’t believe anything PT says, doesn’t mean I support the current regime. 

 

Far from it. 

 

Check my posting history if you are in doubt. 

He won't.. any post against the PTP means your automatically pro junta. Its hard for him to understand you can be against both of them.

[candide]

In the other journal I read that they also filed a complaint against Thanathorn from Future Forward for the same reason. It seems they are starting to set standards for the election campaign, during which no criticism of the Junta will allowed.

[robblok]

3 minutes ago, candide said:

In the other journal I read that they also filed a complaint against Thanathorn from Future Forward for the same reason. It seems they are starting to set standards for the election campaign, during which no criticism of the Junta will allowed.

Yes just read that too, crazy but if he has proof to back his claims up he will probably be ok. I like the future forward party (though it stated its not a party yet). The charge is that he was giving out false information about the MP's switching sides. If he can back his claims up its no longer false information.

[candide]

1 hour ago, robblok said:

If the PTP wins and IF they do the following as stated in the article

 

If the Pheu Thai Party won the election and formed a government, it would amend the Computer Act to prevent it from being used as a polical tool to restrict the people’s honest rights and freedom of expression, he said.

 

Then they would have my full support on that issue, too bad they never want to do the same with the defamation laws. Now that would be a great improvement. Too bad they too like that law a lot.

Well, even from an opportunistic point of view, it would make sense:

- the dominantly yellow courts are not likely to convict their opponents,

- and most of all, IF the Junta allows them to govern, it is very likely that it will not be long before they are impeached by the Senate, for whatever reason, i.e. for not applying a vaguely defined strategic plan or because of another trap set in the constitution.

[Bluespunk]

13 minutes ago, candide said:

In the other journal I read that they also filed a complaint against Thanathorn from Future Forward for the same reason. It seems they are starting to set standards for the election campaign, during which no criticism of the Junta will allowed.

Quell surprise

[candide]

8 minutes ago, robblok said:

Yes just read that too, crazy but if he has proof to back his claims up he will probably be ok. I like the future forward party (though it stated its not a party yet). The charge is that he was giving out false information about the MP's switching sides. If he can back his claims up its no longer false information.

Such as a testimonial from a corrupt politician who will explain he was approached and offered not to be indicted for his corrupt behaviour! ?

[robblok]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

Well, even from an opportunistic point of view, it would make sense:

- the dominantly yellow courts are not likely to convict their opponents,

- and most of all, IF the Junta allows them to govern, it is very likely that it will not be long before they are impeached by the Senate, for whatever reason, i.e. for not applying a vaguely defined strategic plan or because of another trap set in the constitution.

I think its far more likely they will get disbanded because of Thaksins inability to step away from the spotlight and do his dealings with the PTP in secret. Remember there is a new law in place for outside influences. So no need to impeach them or kick them out for something else when all they have to do is watch and observe Thaksin his meetings with the PTP. 

[robblok]

1 minute ago, candide said:

Such as a testimonial from a corrupt politician who will explain he was approached and offered not to be indicted for his corrupt behaviour! ?

Good point but that means that those PTP politicians are corrupt.. it cant.. be.. it cant.. i would never have imagined that ?

 

But I get your point.

 

But really if you bring out news like this in the world you better be able to backup your claims. (not that I don't believe it but one needs to have evidence to back up claims)

Edited August 1, 2018 by robblok

[jesimps]

Robblok and Baerboxer, still the same old junta fanatics despite all that's gone on.

[tomas557]

1 minute ago, jesimps said:

Robblok and Baerboxer, still the same old junta fanatics despite all that's gone on.

No no, according to them lately the junta is very bad...............but PTP is more bad

[pornprong]

16 minutes ago, tomas557 said:

No no, according to them lately the junta is very bad...............but PTP is more bad

How right you are.

Thaksin is the devil incarnate whilst Prayuth is just a naughty boy ?

[Media1]

National what lol. 2

[JAG]

7 hours ago, robblok said:

I think its far more likely they will get disbanded because of Thaksins inability to step away from the spotlight and do his dealings with the PTP in secret. Remember there is a new law in place for outside influences. So no need to impeach them or kick them out for something else when all they have to do is watch and observe Thaksin his meetings with the PTP. 

The timing of such a disbandment will be critical. It has to be close enough to the election to prevent any effective reincarnation, yet obviously not after the election has been called, because that would be seen as interfering with the electoral process, and that would never do.

 

A tricky balancing act, but with the glittering prize of effectively disenfranchising a vast swathe of the country, both geographically and demographically. A swathe which is incorrigibly opposed to the cabal which seeks to confirm their grip on power, and one which will keep voting for the " bad people".

 

Still, I expect that some of the brightest minds at the Staff College are working on it.