Jump to content

First Yellowstone-area grizzly hunt in 40 years blocked by federal judge


Recommended Posts

First Yellowstone-area grizzly hunt in 40 years blocked by federal judge

By Laura Zuckerman



FILE PHOTO: A grizzly bear and her two cubs is seen on a field at Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, United States, July 6, 2015. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo


(Reuters) - A federal judge in Montana on Thursday issued a court order temporarily blocking the first trophy hunts of Yellowstone-area grizzly bears in more than 40 years, siding with native American groups and environmentalists seeking to restore the animals' protected status.


The 14-day restraining order by U.S. District Judge Dana Christensen in Missoula, Montana, came two days before Wyoming and Idaho were scheduled to open licensed grizzly hunts allowing as many as 23 bears in the two states to be shot and killed for sport.


Groups opposing the hunts had sought a restraining order while waiting for the judge to rule on the larger question of whether the federal government should return Endangered Species Act safeguards to grizzlies in the greater Yellowstone region.


Christensen heard arguments from both sides on Thursday and took the case under advisement without indicating when he would render a decision. But in granting the restraining order, he said that the conservation and tribal groups had shown that they were "likely to succeed on the merits" of their lawsuits.


Wyoming and Idaho had been scheduled to open their newly established hunting season for grizzlies outside Yellowstone National Park starting on Saturday.


U.S. law prohibits hunting altogether inside the park, and Montana has decided against opening a grizzly season, citing concerns about long-term recovery of a bear population that is arguably one of the most celebrated and photographed in the world.


The stage for grizzly hunting in the region was set in June 2017 when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that the large, hump-shouldered bears would cease to be listed as a threatened species in and around Yellowstone. That left grizzly management to the discretion of the states, and prompted lawsuits challenging the action.


The decision by the Trump administration on the de-listing, formally proposed in 2016 during the Obama era, was based on agency findings that the bears' numbers have rebounded enough in recent decades that federal protections are no longer necessary.



Grizzlies in the Lower 48 states number fewer than 2,000 bears, compared to an historic high of 100,000 before extermination campaigns brought their numbers to just several hundred by 1975, when they came under the Endangered Species Act.


The de-listing decision last year applied to about 700 Yellowstone-area grizzlies in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana. Environmentalists argue that treating those bears separately from other grizzly populations in Montana and elsewhere was biologically unsound and illegal under the Endangered Species Act.


  Renny MacKay, spokesman for Wyoming's Game and Fish Department, said the state would abide by the court's decision.

  U.S. wildlife managers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Native Americans revere the grizzly as sacred.


  "It's essential to protecting our religious and spiritual freedoms, and treaty rights in Yellowstone," said Stan Grier, chief of the Piikani Nation and president of the Blackfoot Confederacy Chiefs. "This sacred being is considered to be a deity by many tribes, not a rug."


(Reporting by Laura Zuckerman in Pinedale, Wyoming; Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Sandra Maler)

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-31
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webfact said:

open licensed grizzly hunts allowing as many as 23 bears in the two states to be shot and killed for sport.


Twenty-three is probably OK, as long as cubs are not killed (I think they are "fair-game" in Alaska), and no shooting from helicopters (which is also allowed in Alaska).


Op-ed piece...



Should We Hunt Yellowstone Grizzly Bears?


A complete hunting ban on previously protected grizzly bears (or any large carnivore, for that matter) disenfranchises hunters, who have contributed much to conservation over the past century. A more useful approach is to find a consensus on how many of these bears we ought to sustain — and where — based on rigorous, peer-reviewed science.




Link to post
Share on other sites

Why kill an endangered species?  A trophy hunt, hanging a dead animal's head on the wall, sounds all too bizarre for me.  Why would anyone want to hang a carcass on the wall?  To prove he is okay down there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Auction off 23 tags, male grizzly bears only. $100,000 dollar minimum bid.  Proceeds to go to grizzly bear conservation. Hunters will only want the biggest old trophy bears that are short-timers. Not politically correct, (I don't hunt or own guns) but pragmatic.

Link to post
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...