Closing ranks?

 

10 minutes ago, Rhys said:

Closing ranks?

 

Potential for that?

15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

There is also something called chemical castration. But I think in this case, that's overkill as I assume he'll be sent to prison. 

Jingthing???? 

 

In prison it's all men and obviously they still get the urge for hanky lanky so I would suggest it's absolutely essential to give him drugs or castrate him over wise he will feel like a kid in a sweet shop and start infecting the prison populations?

 

 

 

On 11/9/2018 at 4:40 PM, Fairynuff said:

Mentioning his HIV status is purely designed to sensationalise. It cannot be passed on if he is on medication. That however doesn’t change the fact that he is a rapist and should have the book thrown at him. He’s a lowlife piece of **** deserving nothing but contempt

One report says he tested positive in 2009 but never started treatment until 2015.  That is a lot of time to do a lot if damage.  And by the way, it appears that he doesn't care about other people's rights either. He is now officially an oxygen thief.  Scum of the first order!!!

How is an HIV+ soldier allowed to remain on active duty?

Any other modern military they are medically discharged.  

Very unfortunate but many pedophiles take advantage of children and are often people who have access to children.  

On 11/8/2018 at 8:05 AM, worgeordie said:

The only justice he deserves is a very,very, long time in prison,

he knew exactly what he was doing to these boys,many who

could now be infected.

regards worgeordie

This is very tragic and sad

 

On ‎11‎/‎9‎/‎2018 at 2:12 AM, happy chappie said:

Here's what the death penalty actually does.https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2014/09/29/the-death-penalty-saves-lives-by-deterring-crime

If you're really interested in the research, give this 2016 paper a read: https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=67747

The authors find that the meta-analytic research on capital punishment (including the paper you cite) is unreliable and that the findings better reflect the authors' profession (economics vs other) than any other variable. Small differences in meta-analytical methodology--perhaps driven by researchers' ideology--have a huge impact on the outcomes of the studies. These authors conclude that there is no basis yet on which to draw conclusions on the deterrent effect of capital punishment.   

3 hours ago, Docno said:

If you're really interested in the research, give this 2016 paper a read: https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=67747

The authors find that the meta-analytic research on capital punishment (including the paper you cite) is unreliable and that the findings better reflect the authors' profession (economics vs other) than any other variable. Small differences in meta-analytical methodology--perhaps driven by researchers' ideology--have a huge impact on the outcomes of the studies. These authors conclude that there is no basis yet on which to draw conclusions on the deterrent effect of capital punishment.   

We can do all the research we want but most cases it don't include terrorism,the likes of Harold shipman and I'm using the uk as my basis.i can show you the Granth of the murder rate since the abolition of capital punidhment in the uk in 1964 and it will piss on any other theories I'm reading about.

8 hours ago, JimmyTheMook said:

How is an HIV+ soldier allowed to remain on active duty?

Any other modern military they are medically discharged.  

Wrong