Jump to content

Lawyer vows to pursue rape claim against doctor


webfact

Recommended Posts

This Pervert doctor was also my wife’s pre and post natal surgeon, & I can tell you he was absurdly different to a normal visit to the quacks.

I often asked my wife & questioned myself, is that normal for a Thai doctor to do these strange practices.

He was recommended to us from others who vouched for his tidy surgical skills at the hospital, the only reason we chose him, yet his clinic was truly disgusting and still had all the dirty tide marks of the 2011 Nakhon Sawan flood.

 

Wifey said it would be pointless for us to make a complaint, as a doctor he would have enough money to pay off all the right people and discretion in Thailand cannot be trusted.

 

We do hope that he does go down for it though, “and has a taste of is own medicine up the backside!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DoctorG said:

I was thinking this but thought everyone would just yell "victim blaming" so I chickened out. ????

Gullible = exploitation...

Thailand you're taught from a young age never to question those in a higher position or older than you !!!

I also don't understand the mentality of settlement in private ie out of court !!

This allows him to stay in employment to carry on his unorthodox practices !!

He should go to court, proved guilty of malpractice, struck off the doctors register and jailed for sexual assault !! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fury builds in Nakhon Sawan as rape accusations mount against gynaecologist

By The Nation

 

Public Health Ministry permanent secretary Dr Sukhum Kanchanapimai affirmed on Friday that a doctor accused of raping a female patient at a state hospital in Nakhon Sawan would face disciplinary punishment if found guilty, noting it was a criminal offence.
 

Sukhum said he had assigned an inspector-general who oversees Nakhon Sawan and the head of the provincial health office to follow up on the investigation.

 

He said the officials would determine whether the accused doctor, who has not been publicly identified, did indeed work at the public hospital, and whether his gynaecology clinic met required standards.

 

They will take interim measures as appropriate pending the results of a fact-finding probe.

 

Sukhum urged women to feel secure about having gynaecological check-ups at public or private hospitals because they provide a high standard of service, including requiring a female nurse to be present during the procedure.

 

Nakhon Sawan public health inspector Dr Boonchai Theerakan said the director of Sawan Pracharak Hospital had already summoned the accused doctor for an interview.

 

Although the alleged rape took place at the doctor’s clinic, he must be investigated as a member of the civil service.

 

Medical Council secretary-general Dr Itthaporn Kanachareon said on Thursday his agency was prepared to investigate if the accuser so requests or if the council at its next meeting in in two weeks decides on its own to do so.

 

Actress-turned-activist Panadda Wongphudee, who reportedly brought the case to lawyer Saranya Wangsukcharoen, has meanwhile revealed that 10 more victims had since come to her with similar accusations and she could not see how the doctor could escape punishment.

 

Panadda made the comment in a recent Facebook post in which she criticised a police officer and reporters for revealing the identity of the original accuser.

 

She said the police officer in Muang Nakhon Sawan precinct, whom she did not name, showed the formal complaint sheet to reporters, who then published the alleged victim’s name.

 

Panadda said the invasion of privacy dealt a further blow to the accused, who already faced a prolonged court battle and derision from unsympathetic men and women.

 

She said her charity group would sue the policeman and the media outlets involved.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30358689

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-11-16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, outsider said:

The victim should have reported the doctor for the first incident when 'the doctor rubbed his genitals against hers and tried to kiss her on the mouth' instead of seeking treatment again at the clinic and undergoing a further gynaecological check-up. Why go back?

Multiple wais coming up. 

 

Can see the evidence wont stand up in court. 

 

Why is it a matter between the both of them?

And not a police matter?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the “examination”, she says the doctor rubbed his genitals against hers and tried to kiss her on the mouth, and she had to push him away three times before he withdrew. 

 

WAIT JUST A MOMENT, after all that the woman still went back for a second time action replay? And it took up to 20 minutes of alleged being raped before realising she was being sexually molested. Was she under an anaesthetic at the time?

 

My theory: The woman being a lawyer who knows or should know the law after the first incident says nothing and decides to build up a case against the doctor in which she can sue for compensation big time. So she goes back a second time, lets the perverted doctor try it on again, then got him, time to take this doctor for all he`s worth.

 

Good luck to her and the doctor`s career is finished, which he deserves. Guy`s a mug.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, webfact said:

When the patient asked why the doctor inserted the phallic object wrapped in condom, the doctor replied that the use of such an object was regarded as a sexual arousal technique so the pain in the affected area would be reduced due to the release of a "happiness hormone", similar to the use of narcotic substance to treat pain

 

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/how-orgasm-could-dull-pain/361470/

 

interesting in that studies arguably support the doctors claims about pain reduction..... but disturbing in the way of treating the pain.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, giddyup said:

Raped her for 15-20 minutes and it was after that she decided to pursue criminal charges? Did she ever just say stop while all this was going on?

It depends on who the victim is. A not so sophisticated person may not understand what is going on, she might have thought that this is a standard procedure the doctor is exercising. Remember it is Asia where the doctor is respected and in high regard. It happens to everybody to re-evaluate a situation afterwards and see with a clearer eye  what  has really occurred. I think the woman was a true victim of a perverted person 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Geoffggi said:

If he is found guilty he should be struck off the medical list and no questions ask.

That is presuming he is on the 'list' at all...

 

How many fake degrees are there in Thailand, I wonder.

 

For a nation with schools where pupils never fail, such charlatans should not be a big shock...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, marios said:

It depends on who the victim is. A not so sophisticated person may not understand what is going on, she might have thought that this is a standard procedure the doctor is exercising. Remember it is Asia where the doctor is respected and in high regard. It happens to everybody to re-evaluate a situation afterwards and see with a clearer eye  what  has really occurred. I think the woman was a true victim of a perverted person 

Standard procedure is for the doctor to have sex with the patient?  Then when did she wake up that it's not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kevvy said:

Can anyone please explain ... We hear all these stories from this site , rapes, murders, innocent people being run over , school children being abused and the list goes on ..

WHY , doesn't this site or the Nation let us know what actually happens to the people who get charged and their sentence .

The culprit let go after a wait at police station or 500-1000Thb fine isn't interesting on the long run, 

The under the table settlements not public.

Really, not much to update on, unless the said culprit is foreigner and thus either can't properly wai, or make settlement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 1337markus said:

Seems to be a Thai mens past time; first we had the farang women on the islands now this case, more to report similar incidents who knows. Lack of maturity to comply with the laws they put into place. SAD.

Right on!....you would never hear of a Farang rapeing a woman back home...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, heybuz said:

Why go back after first time.

 

This latest news report has a bunch more detail that was lacking from the original report... including the part about going back for a second visit after alleged misconduct occurred during an initial visit.

 

The waters here seem to have gotten a whole lot murkier.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...