You are making a slight mistake: Above all, the prerequisite for any successful and constructive debate is a common denominator, a shared logic, or better yet, a common understanding of justice—but also the mutual capacity to perceive reality and accept facts. This is simply not possible between normal-thinking people with a functioning sense of morality and Zionists. These people live in a reality where, no matter what happens, they will always be the victim acting solely out of self-defense, yet always just and guided by moral principles, while their opponents are fundamentally the despicable perpetrators who follow base instincts or a religious death cult and want to wipe out what is good. And no matter what happens in this conflict and what atrocities are committed by them, everything without exception must be interpreted in such a way that their status as victims is proven anew each time. In doing so, they neither stop at the most hair-raising mental gymnastics nor at repeating completely absurd statements over and over until people believe them—and if their atrocities are so obvious that they can simply no greater be denied, then they say, 'Don't bother me with that, I've heard enough of it.' For nearly eight decades, with then help of western media and politicians these people have been used to getting away with absolutely everything, with the most hideous crimes, without any consequences. So why should they engage in a discussion about good and evil?
Create an account or sign in to comment