51 minutes ago, robblok said:

So a Brit 90% what about people from the US, Australia, Netherlands and Russia. What are your percentages for those ?

14.1% 65% 89.7766% and 101%.............

3 hours ago, greenbottle555 said:

They tested his alcohol, but the report doesn't say he had any in him. So it's either very poor reporting or he simply had no alcohol in him. They said he "appeared drunk" but that means nothing, people appear in such a way to fit a context and a guy who just had a wreck like that, in pattaya, would already be presumed (therefore appear) drunk.

 

I wish the reporting actually was better because as it is written, he didn't consume any alcohol and the only thing suggesting that is the hear-say that always gets injected.

you also have the effects  of "shock"  to contend  with

4 minutes ago, Formaleins said:

5 hours ago, jacko45k said:

Poor Thai guy on the ground , everyone seems to be ignoring him. Even the ambulance passed on by. 

He seemed a little bit busy on his phone.

He is busy talking to salespeople, spending all the money coming his way.

1 hour ago, Lupatria said:

He probably wears a "Neymar" shirt...

More likely a 'Ronaldo' shirt.

 

3 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

The longer he stays down the bigger the pay packet.

It appears he has a hand injury.

but  not  the one holding his phone eh????

I love it - even when down on the ground, Thais are still on their own....

5 hours ago, webfact said:

A 60 year old female tourist, a 65 year old male tourist and a 40-45 year old Thai man were reportedly injured at the scene.

bet i know which one will cost more

These tragic stories bring out sick attempts at humour, experts who read an article and know-it-all and assorted uncivil comments.

 

These articles are often written by "reporters or relpeaters", who may rely on second, third or slight of hand information.

5 hours ago, RotBenz8888 said:

I just wonder why you would film wounded people and post it on internet?

it's called "news reporting".

it happens a lot around the world.

before the internet, it was on TV and before that in movie theaters.

some people called "reporters" would also go and record when they talked to people and ask them what they had seen to then broadcast it.

Edited February 27, 20197 yr by manarak

He can't possibly pay all the victims off.

That would cost him an arm and a leg.

I've read that he's a bit short in that department already  . . .  ????

1 hour ago, tlandtday said:

might be ladyboy lol

Slurp

2 hours ago, fruitman said:

I noticed that after an accident the Thai always stay on the floor for a long time.....why is that?

Injuries?

Kick this bandit out after he has paid out????

4 hours ago, greenbottle555 said:

They tested his alcohol, but the report doesn't say he had any in him. So it's either very poor reporting or he simply had no alcohol in him. They said he "appeared drunk" but that means nothing, people appear in such a way to fit a context and a guy who just had a wreck like that, in pattaya, would already be presumed (therefore appear) drunk.

 

I wish the reporting actually was better because as it is written, he didn't consume any alcohol and the only thing suggesting that is the hear-say that always gets injected.

Nonetheless another quality tourist..........but this one will pay a very heavy toll.

1 hour ago, tlandtday said:

91.2345 and 92.4599 respectively ????????????????

and catching baht bus or motorbike taxis. The difference being drunk driving and causing personal harm to others as a result of his driving

6 hours ago, RotBenz8888 said:

I just wonder why you would film wounded people and post it on internet?

It's the same with pyromaniacs, they also film fires and injured people and post it, they probably get some kind of (sexual?) satisfaction from it.  

5 hours ago, Snow Leopard said:

You can't accuse him of being harmless in this accident. 

Did you say armless? ????

15 minutes ago, Rampant20 said:

Nonetheless another quality tourist..........but this one will pay a very heavy toll.

I bet the injured already have filed a lawsuit against him with help from greedy lawyers. 

He was legless, but not 'armless

6 hours ago, darksidedog said:

Prosthetic arm or not, having an accident like this when drunk will normally see you in jail for a significant period in many places around the world. This being Thailand, it is more likely to be a case of how much money it costs him.

Probably more than he'll get for the Fortuna in scrap value !!

what was the blood alcohol content of the driver ......and the result was he was h/armless........

7 hours ago, RotBenz8888 said:

I just wonder why you would film wounded people and post it on internet?

Yes, same thought as mine. I have previously commented on the morbid curiosity of the Thais and the lack of respect for the victims. You would not see photos/clips like this in the UK press.

5 hours ago, greenbottle555 said:

They tested his alcohol, but the report doesn't say he had any in him. So it's either very poor reporting or he simply had no alcohol in him. They said he "appeared drunk" but that means nothing, people appear in such a way to fit a context and a guy who just had a wreck like that, in pattaya, would already be presumed (therefore appear) drunk.

 

I wish the reporting actually was better because as it is written, he didn't consume any alcohol and the only thing suggesting that is the hear-say that always gets injected.

I'm sure if it were a Thai driving this  ^^ reply wouldn't have got as many likes.

 

 

He lost an arm in a motorbike accident, then decided to drive only 4-wheel vehicles.

7 hours ago, jacko45k said:

Poor Thai guy on the ground , everyone seems to be ignoring him. Even the ambulance passed on by. 

hospitals know theirs no money in him.

So he was legless, but otherwise armless?

5 hours ago, greenbottle555 said:

They tested his alcohol, but the report doesn't say he had any in him. So it's either very poor reporting or he simply had no alcohol in him. They said he "appeared drunk" but that means nothing, people appear in such a way to fit a context and a guy who just had a wreck like that, in pattaya, would already be presumed (therefore appear) drunk.

 

I wish the reporting actually was better because as it is written, he didn't consume any alcohol and the only thing suggesting that is the hear-say that always gets injected.

Thats right, he might be drunk or he could have had a fit. Dont hang him until the breatho results are in. 

 

Regardless he did certainly make a mess of the parked bikes and victims. 

<deleted>! Now everyone with a disability will be scrutinised next time they go for their licence renewal. You can actually drive perfectly fine with a disability, or one hand. The prick was drunk, end of story the arm should have <deleted> all to do with it.

i passed this accident scene,as they were cleaning up...Either way, the fortuner driver must have been traveling at very excessive speed{busy area} to cause that much damage...

another idiot foreigner that needs to be sent home, banned from thailand.

hes lucky many people were not killed...

5 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

As always the reporting we read in this articles is clumsy beyond belief. 

 

I've worked with Thai journalists and not one would last a week in the Real World. But then, when you are taught from birth never to question what chance does a Thai journalist have?