Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Future Forward party gets back at Srisuwan Janya

 

%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A7-Eng

 

The Future Forward party is hitting back at maverick political activist Srisuwan Janya in retaliation for the latter’s campaign against the party, including the latest petition to the Election Commission to disqualify 11 candidates for alleged media shareholding.

 

The complaint was lodged with the Thung Song Hong police station today by the 11 Future Forward candidates, accusing Srisuwan of making false allegations against them regarding their alleged share ownerships.

 

Representing the group, Mr. Karom Prompornklang, an MP-elect, told the media that he used to be a shareholder in a media firm, but the company folded six years ago. A few others also used to be shareholders in media firms which, in reality, are dormant companies which have never engaged in the media business, said Mr. Karom.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/future-forward-party-gets-back-at-srisuwan-janya/

 

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-05-03
Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

accusing Srisuwan of making false allegations against them regarding their alleged share ownerships.

More good than bad but pity thailand is in this cluster

  • Like 1
Posted

He submitted like 1 against PPP ? It would surprise me if pretty much only progressive or anti junta candidates made all these errors and the PPP candidates being 99% clean and in the clear...

 

Edit: he filed one complaint against PPP: "Prominent social activist Srisuwan Janya yesterday also filed the same complaint regarding Chanwit with the EC. "

 

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30368709

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Donutz said:

He submitted like 1 against PPP ? It would surprise me if pretty much only progressive or anti junta candidates made all these errors and the PPP candidates being 99% clean and in the clear...

That candidate didn’t win the seat. Kind of much ado about nothing. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Hopefully this will no longer be news after the election results are announced this week. No matter if the charges are true or not the current leadership will keep throwing charges until something sticks or they are firmly placed at the head of the trough!

  • Like 2
Posted
On 5/4/2019 at 12:00 AM, rickudon said:

So, if you own shares in a company which has a subsidiary which prints a magazine (shall we say 'British Conker world' ) you should be disqualified? Most wouldn't even know the company has a media offshoot ......

 

Insane. Would it still be safe to even own shares in a tracker fund?

the charges have nothing to do with owning shares of any type of company...it's just a way for them to claim wrong doing by the competition and distract people's attention from the reality ....fake news

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...