15 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Who are you calling "white"

My reply was to Thakkar, but if you want to take up that mantel. Yes, you if you want.

5 hours ago, kingdong said:

how many illegal and therefore uncountable numbers of immigrants living in london?a lot more than you would imagine.

Sure, estimated vary from 450k to 850k nationally, depending on what models are used. I would guess the majority are illegally employed by...UK citizens

8 hours ago, Loiner said:

 

 

So it's not worth complaining when describing the US President, but it is when describing the Nazim of Londonistan? Take the weight off your feet, cos that white man's burden is getting to you too much.

“Londonistan”

you reveal your true, racist ugly self with every post.

8 hours ago, simple1 said:

Sure, estimated vary from 450k to 850k nationally, depending on what models are used. I would guess the majority are illegally employed by...UK citizens

Who just happen to be of the same ethnic origin as the illegals. Always easier to get hidden away (an ripped off) by your own.

5 hours ago, Thakkar said:

“Londonistan”

you reveal your true, racist ugly self with every post.

Waycist, Waycist. Water / Ducks back. But it really has already gone that way, and Khan is helping it further.

5 hours ago, Thakkar said:

“Londonistan”

you reveal your true, racist ugly self with every post.

But have I revealed the truth of London's demise to you nonbelievers?

43 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Who just happen to be of the same ethnic origin as the illegals. Always easier to get hidden away (an ripped off) by your own.

yep, in many cases.

Edited June 6, 20197 yr by simple1

Reported derogatory nickname removed.

Sadiq had no problem when Louis Farrakhan visited London when asked. Put your Bias aside and ask yourself why he objects to Trump but not Farrakhan. There you have it..............

Sadiq had no problem when Louis Farrakhan visited London when asked. Put your Bias aside and ask yourself why he objects to Trump but not Farrakhan. There you have it..............

I'm fine with telling them both to bugger off!

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

26 minutes ago, briansbiology said:

Sadiq had no problem when Louis Farrakhan visited London when asked. Put your Bias aside and ask yourself why he objects to Trump but not Farrakhan. There you have it..............

Did Farrakhan get the royal treatment from the UK gov?  Kahn only objected to Trump getting a state visit, correct? 

On ‎6‎/‎3‎/‎2019 at 3:55 PM, ThaiPauly said:

I can't stand Khan and what he has done to the city I grew up in, if it wasn't for the historic places in London you would not recognise it for the same place it was 50 years ago.

 

I will be glad when Khan is voted OUT, so good on yer Don for telling it like it is

Thai perhaps you can name  us a city in the world that looks the same as it did 50 years ago ?

 

I havent visited London for 20 years, but I will probably take a trip now that I am back in Europe for the summer.
Will be interesting to see if I can recognize it, probably not.

On 6/3/2019 at 9:27 AM, BTB1958 said:

Good for Trump.  Calling it like the rest of the world sees it.  . Unless your a socialist liberal. Than free food and free everything for all immigrants.  

Very nicely put Khan is a waste of space. London votes remain in the EU elections largely due to its ‘new Europeans’  arriving !

 

Trump speaks what most of us think.

9 hours ago, Thakkar said:

“Londonistan”

you reveal your true, racist ugly self with every post.

In many areas it feels like Londonstan shops only advertising in Muslim Arab text, no one speaking English. Foreign beggars on the streets. Advertising only in Polish or other foreign languages.

 

You call this guy a racist for speaking the truth. People who do that are scared of the truth and people like that start dictatorships like Communst states.

 

 

1 hour ago, Jim1000 said:

Thai perhaps you can name  us a city in the world that looks the same as it did 50 years ago ?

 

Venice?

6 hours ago, Loiner said:

But have I revealed the truth of London's demise to you nonbelievers?

When hasn't London been home to waves of immigrants? It's ethnic mix is always changing.

26 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

When hasn't London been home to waves of immigrants? It's ethnic mix is always changing.

Please roll on the next change soon, the current waves have swapped the place and look like staying too long.

28 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

When hasn't London been home to waves of immigrants? It's ethnic mix is always changing.

This reminds me of a comedy skit:

 

If I ran this country, the first thing I'd do is get rid of all the bloody immigrants. Oh yeah, this country would be great again if we kicked out all the Polish. And the Indians, and the Chinese and the Africans. Yeah, and the Huguenots. Comin' over here from France in the late seventeenth century. And them Normans, coming over here in 1066, shooting their foreign arrows about. And before that it was the Vikings wasn't it? With their raping and their pillaging and their longboats and their stupid axes. and their open top bloody sandwiches- it's unnatural ain't it? And before that it was the Anglos, and the Saxons. What about the bleeding' Romans? Them Romans, yeah, probably built the straight roads so's they could get to the dole office faster. And all those weird guys in fur pelts claims they only came here across the land bridge to hunt mammoth. Not bloody likely, mate; hunt your own mammoth. And don't get me started on Homo Erectus; come over here from Africa, just because the land masses were linked up. I'm glad that tectonic shift sorted that out! Don't forget those early tetrapods, draggin' their fishy bodies outta the sea. Get back to the sea where you belong, you evolutionary bastards! Sling 'em out, sling 'em all out, I say. Then we'll just have the real Brits in the country. Anyway, I'm starving. Think I fancy a curry.

I'm still trying to figure out why Trump thinks "stone cold" is an insult.  Does it mean something other than emotionless?  The only other reference I can find is to a pro wrestling actor, Stone Cold Steve Austin.  After more than two years Trump should be able to come up with better insults to hurl during his temper tantrums.

3 minutes ago, attrayant said:

I'm still trying to figure out why Trump thinks "stone cold" is an insult.  Does it mean something other than emotionless?  The only other reference I can find is to a pro wrestling actor, Stone Cold Steve Austin.  After more than two years Trump should be able to come up with better insults to hurl during his temper tantrums.

Why just the two years , Donald was born 71 years ago or do you think that he only learnt to speak two years asgo

He found the need to start insulting people at such a rate only recently, unless you think he's been this way his whole life.  I have not been following his antics prior to 2016, so I can't comment on that.

Troll post with an inappropriate name has been removed as well as a reply.

 

I think he is very lacking in diplomatic etiquette. I don't like Trump a bit.

2 hours ago, attrayant said:

I'm still trying to figure out why Trump thinks "stone cold" is an insult.  Does it mean something other than emotionless?  The only other reference I can find is to a pro wrestling actor, Stone Cold Steve Austin.  After more than two years Trump should be able to come up with better insults to hurl during his temper tantrums.

"Stone Cold" is not an insult. "Loser" is the insult. "Stone Cold" is the modifier of the insult. And though I disagree with much of Trump's Presidency, one area you can not fault him is his brilliant and unique use of the English language. Had Trump merely referred to him as a "loser", we probably still wouldn't be talking about or even have remembered the tweet. Adding an unusual modifier in front of the insult made it memorable and caused it to stick in our minds. Trump does this a lot. He uses uncommon words or words that are not commonly used in the context he is using them them in order to plant a particular idea in your head. 

5 minutes ago, usviphotography said:

"Stone Cold" is not an insult. "Loser" is the insult. "Stone Cold" is the modifier of the insult. And though I disagree with much of Trump's Presidency, one area you can not fault him is his brilliant and unique use of the English language. Had Trump merely referred to him as a "loser", we probably still wouldn't be talking about or even have remembered the tweet. Adding an unusual modifier in front of the insult made it memorable and caused it to stick in our minds. Trump does this a lot. He uses uncommon words or words that are not commonly used in the context he is using them them in order to plant a particular idea in your head. 

English translation , Tosser.

17 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Did Farrakhan get the royal treatment from the UK gov?  Kahn only objected to Trump getting a state visit, correct? 

no he didnt because he was not invited by the queen for a state visit. one is personal (where its more appropriate to excerise one's disgust) the other is on behalf of the state and your Queen (where it isnt)

 

15 hours ago, bristolboy said:

When hasn't London been home to waves of immigrants? It's ethnic mix is always changing.

Agree but not millions all at once where English is rarely spoken. Plus they are encouraged to embrace their own culture not ours

On ‎6‎/‎3‎/‎2019 at 9:14 PM, poohy said:

Respect is  earned...Trump does not deserve one iota !

Substitute "polite" for respect then. 

Khan did not earn my respect either, but I doubt I'd "egg" him, if given the chance.

13 hours ago, usviphotography said:

"Stone Cold" is not an insult. "Loser" is the insult. "Stone Cold" is the modifier of the insult. And though I disagree with much of Trump's Presidency, one area you can not fault him is his brilliant and unique use of the English language. Had Trump merely referred to him as a "loser", we probably still wouldn't be talking about or even have remembered the tweet. Adding an unusual modifier in front of the insult made it memorable and caused it to stick in our minds. Trump does this a lot. He uses uncommon words or words that are not commonly used in the context he is using them them in order to plant a particular idea in your head. 

Yeah, Trump is a genius at making people think about him to the extent they get TDS.

He owns their minds.