8 hours ago, Somtamnication said:

This beauty knows no bounds with his tongue (and fingers). What a shame, America!!!

ha ha ha...(555)...joke is on YOU....UK!

 

Sucks to be in uk, lol!

7 hours ago, Ozman52 said:

"President Donald Trump insisted on Sunday that he never called Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and the wife of Britain's Prince Harry, "nasty", despite an audio recording of an interview showing he did.

Key points:

Mr Trump said the comment was 'fake news' and demanded an apology from media outlets

The audio recording published by The Sun reveals Mr Trump said "she was nasty"

The comments come ahead of Mr Trump's state visit to the UK this week

The president was discussing Meghan in a recent interview with Britain's The Sun newspaper in the run-up to his state visit to the UK on Monday.

"I never called Meghan Markle 'nasty.' Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!" Mr Trump tweeted.

Mr Trump, in fact, did use the word "nasty" to describe Meghan when asked about her comments about him during the 2016 campaign."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-03/trump-denies-calling-meghan-markle-nasty-in-recording/11172220

 

So much for fake news, and which liar got "caught cold". There is the possibility that he believes his own lies, caused by Alzheimer's disease short term memory loss.

 

he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!

Edited June 3, 20197 yr by 2tall

4 minutes ago, 2tall said:

he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!

Back to reality -- he called her nasty. 

You can say that a person is being nasty , without meaning that they are a nasty person .

15 minutes ago, 2tall said:

he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!

you will upset royalist and loyalist malagateddy talking about our royal family in that tone,

4 hours ago, bomber said:

i dont think he has been 4-1,i could be wrong but a checked one day last week and he was 2-1,anyway i still think many tory MPs who were going to vote for BJ will be annoyed with Sun tan man bulling BJ up and could switch just to piss Trump off,maybe he wants to be pisssed on ???? i meant off

I had the impression a few weeks ago that Farage was the front runner. It seems as though he sort of .. lost steam?  ????

 

Haha

8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yep. It's basically a campaign trip anyway. Paid by the taxpayers.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

 

Now suddenly somebody gets bitter about socialism and free money being handed out. Free everything for illegal aliens who come illegally but god forbid the very POTUS benefits from anything. lol 

9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I agree with Trump. Khan, IMO is a loser that has made a shambles of London while jetting off doing something not involved with running London.

Eg, on a recent visit to London, there was not a single public toilet that I could find in the most heavily touristed area of the city. Tourists were having to pay several pounds to use toilets in Starbucks or McDonalds etc. I used to live in London and there were several available in the same area then. 

You can't have looked very hard! There are public tourists in or near all major tourist attractions and many other places in London; Toilets in London. Granted, not all are free.

 

Also, I have no idea where you got the idea that "tourists were having to pay several pounds to use toilets in Starbucks or McDonalds etc.." I travel to all parts of London, from the outer boroughs to the City, regularly for work and my experience is that if you can't find a public toilet, McDonalds, Starbucks, etc., even most betting shops will let you use theirs free of charge; all you have to do is ask!

 

Yes, many public toilets in London have closed, but these closures were the decision of the Boroughs, not the Mayor and the largest number of closures occurred when a certain B. Johnson was in charge at City Hall!

 

So is your blaming Khan for the closures based on ignorance, or something more sinister?

12 minutes ago, Solinvictus said:

I had the impression a few weeks ago that Farage was the front runner. It seems as though he sort of .. lost steam?  ????

 

Haha

farage isnt a tory,and for good measure BJ isnt a proper brexiteer he's was in it for personal gain,they stood together for the camera's next to the big red bus waving unionjacks but in reality wouldnt see eye to eye trying to deliver a brexit resolution.

1 hour ago, sanemax said:

You can say that a person is being nasty , without meaning that they are a nasty person .

Read the article linked to by Ozman52

 

Trump said "No, I didn't know that she was nasty."

 

He didn't say that she had done something nasty nor said something nasty, but that she was nasty.

 

So he wasn't calling certain deeds by her nasty, he was calling her a nasty person.

 

Further remedial English lessons available to you on request.

 

Mind you, it is obvious that in what passes for Trumps mind that anyone who does not praise him unconditionally is a nasty person; especially if, like the Duchess did before her marriage meant she could no longer comment on politics, they have dared to criticise him!

 

10 hours ago, trigpoint said:

Nice one Trump, London has really gone down the pan since he took over, voted in by his fellow Muslim's and the now majority immigrants who live there.

All you have proven is that you know absolutely nothing of London nor the people who live there.

 

No wonder you support Trump; facts are in short supply in his mind, too!

8 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Putin slipping in secretly

shhhh, that's supposed to be a secret between Vlad and Donnie...

 

 

10 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

When I lived there, there were more immigrants living in London than English. In the hospitals that I worked in, English staff were almost non existent.

 

Really? 

 

Those who have never lived in London may believe you.

1 minute ago, 7by7 said:

Read the article linked to by Ozman52

 

Trump said "No, I didn't know that she was nasty."

 

He didn't say that she had done something nasty nor said something nasty, but that she was nasty.

 

So he wasn't calling certain deeds by her nasty, he was calling her a nasty person.

 

Further remedial English lessons available to you on request.

 

Mind you, it is obvious that in what passes for Trumps mind that anyone who does not praise him unconditionally is a nasty person; especially if, like the Duchess did before her marriage meant she could no longer comment on politics, they have dared to criticise him!

 

I do disagree , everyone can say nasty things and everyone does , that doesn't necessarily mean that they are nasty people .

   There is a difference to saying that her comments were nasty comments and saying that she is a nasty person .

  Trump was saying that her comments were nasty , rather than saying that she is a nasty person 

Just now, sanemax said:

I do disagree , everyone can say nasty things and everyone does , that doesn't necessarily mean that they are nasty people .

   There is a difference to saying that her comments were nasty comments and saying that she is a nasty person .

  Trump was saying that her comments were nasty , rather than saying that she is a nasty person 

As I said, remedial English classes are available to you on request. You obviously need them!

Just now, 7by7 said:

As I said, remedial English classes are available to you on request. You obviously need them!

Nasty comment from a nasty person .

2 hours ago, 2tall said:

he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!

 

No one said your post was put up by an over-inflated gasbag.  Any claim otherwise is an outright lie.

 

 

Edited June 3, 20197 yr by bendejo

10 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

He didn't say that she had done something nasty nor said something nasty, but that she was nasty.

 

You are mistaken , the reporter asked Trump to comment on Markle comments about what she said about him .

 

  "During the interview, Trump was confronted by the comments made by Markle ahead of the 2016 US presidential election where she said on "The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore" that Trump was misogynistic and that his politics was divisive. The then actress added that she would move to Canada if he won the presidency."

 

 

 

Trump responded: "I didn't know that she was nasty. I hope she is OK..."

8 minutes ago, sanemax said:

10 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

As I said, remedial English classes are available to you on request. You obviously need them!

Nasty comment from a nasty person .

 

I assume that you are not calling me a nasty person, based on your pathetic attempts to excuse Trump and claim that his saying the Duchess was nasty did not mean he was calling her nasty!!

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, 2tall said:

he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!

He meant that her comments were nasty , rather than her being a nasty person .

trump will get wiped out at the next US election,if he isnt wiped out earlier,the man is pushing his luck way to far,and i dont mean todays petty childish tweets.

18 minutes ago, bomber said:

trump will get wiped out at the next US election,if he isnt wiped out earlier,the man is pushing his luck way to far,and i dont mean todays petty childish tweets.

 

You'll eat those words after he is reelected 

as it's the weak media backed by the spineless

who perpetrate the propaganda that the worlds simpletons

are lead to believe.

 

#hola @ yo boi 

 

   

9 minutes ago, JimmyTheMook said:

 

You'll eat those words after he is reelected 

as it's the weak media backed by the spineless

who perpetrate the propaganda that the worlds simpletons

are lead to believe.

 

#hola @ yo boi 

 

   

dream on yanky doodle,he has no chance,more chance of brexit happening than trump getting re-elected

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

The office of the USA presidency deserves respect. The trouble is the current occupant is a disgrace to that office.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Respect the office yes, but the current occupant, no way . 

 

Wonder if he left his food on the plate at the state banquet, and ordered his favoured maccas and shake back at the embassy

 

 

I agree with you   Mr  Trump.

14 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Well, Trump (once again)shows his complete lack of understanding of diplomacy, decorum or common good manners.

 

Chamberlain tried  that too with Hitler.

Edited June 3, 20197 yr by Chazar

12 hours ago, ivor bigun said:

The sooner the slimy little toad Khan is gone the better.

Sent from my SM-A720F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Reminds me very  much of that other slimy toad Keith Vaz????

10 hours ago, bomber said:

i dont think he has been 4-1,i could be wrong but a checked one day last week and he was 2-1,anyway i still think many tory MPs who were going to vote for BJ will be annoyed with Sun tan man bulling BJ up and could switch just to piss Trump off,maybe he wants to be pisssed on ???? i meant off

Like Obama wanted to be pissed on by Reggie Love? ????

Trump reminds me a bit of Duterte. Both men have such delicate egos, and cannot handle any perceived slights to themselves. Both men suffer from severe lack of self esteem, masked by oversized self aggrandizement. Trump just cannot help himself. Love me or get trashed by me! How boring.