Jump to content








U.S. wants North Korea freeze as beginning, not end, of denuclearisation


webfact

Recommended Posts

U.S. wants North Korea freeze as beginning, not end, of denuclearisation

By David Brunnstrom

 

2019-07-10T043624Z_3_LYNXNPEF681R7_RTROPTP_4_NORTHKOREA-USA.JPG

A person walks past a banner showing North Korean and U.S. flags ahead of the North Korea-U.S. summit in Hanoi, Vietnam, February 25, 2019. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States would hope to see a freeze in the North Korean nuclear programme as the start of a process of denuclearisation, the State Department said on Tuesday, ahead of fresh talks with Pyongyang supposed to take place this month.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un had a surprise meeting at the end of June in the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between the two Koreas and agreed to resume a working-level dialogue, stalled since a failed summit in Vietnam in February.

 

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said the talks would likely happen "sometime in July ... probably in the next two or three weeks."

 

The Trump administration has dismissed a New York Times report that said an idea was taking shape among U.S. officials to seek to negotiate a nuclear freeze by North Korea, rather than its complete denuclearisation, thereby tacitly accepting it as a nuclear state.

 

"(A) freeze, you know, that would never be the resolution of a process. That would never be the end of a process," State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus told a regular news briefing. "That would (be) something that we would certainly hope to see at the beginning. But I don't think that the administration has ever characterized a freeze as being the end goal. That would be at the beginning of the process."

 

North Korea has frozen nuclear bomb and missile testing since 2017, but U.S. officials believe it has expanded its arsenal by continuing to produce bomb fuel and missiles. They are keen to see a freeze in this production too.

 

Ortagus said Washington's goal remained the complete elimination of all of North Korea's weapons of mass destruction.

 

She said the U.S. special representative for North Korea, Stephen Biegun, would meet his South Korean counterpart during a visit to Europe this week to discuss ways to achieve this.

 

The DMZ encounter, initiated by a spur-of-the-moment tweet by Trump that Kim said took him by surprise, showed a rapport between the two men but policy analysts said they appear no closer to narrowing the gap between U.S. demands for denuclearisation and North Korea's demand for sanctions relief.

 

The two sides have yet to even agree a common definition of denuclearisation, which North Korea has taken to include the U.S. nuclear umbrella protecting Japan and South Korea. Washington has demanded that Pyongyang give up its nuclear weapons unilaterally.

 

(Reporting by David Brunnstrom; editing by Grant McCool)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-07-10
Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 hours ago, webfact said:

he United States would hope to see a freeze in the North Korean nuclear programme as the start of a process of denuclearisation

So back essentially to POTUS Clinton's agreement with North Korea.

But maybe if Trump gave Kim an office in the White House as a senior advisor, who knows?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

So back essentially to POTUS Clinton's agreement with North Korea.

But maybe if Trump gave Kim an office in the White House as a senior advisor, who knows?

Kim already has that - he is directing the US policy and probably is the sharpest tool in the shed compared to the Trump administration 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kim does not realize the MAIN difference between the US and NK and feels that he has to "deal" with Trump thinking like himself, the guy might be there for a while.

 

Unknowingly, dealing with him on this "friendly" basis could actually put this guy there for a while longer than the intellectual world would care for, but snubbing him (Trump) may result in a sane guy taking the helm of the States and possibly giving NK a far better and more humane future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...