Jump to content

UK PM Johnson tells EU: ditch backstop or face no-deal Brexit


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Mavideol said:

funny, they asked similar question to Boris about his plan to leave the EU and he replied I don't have a clue

 

Actually, he didn't

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mavideol said:

if it's a sinking ship why is the UK trying to hold on to it, why does the EU keep sending extra life vests "jackets"

 

 

52% isn't.

 

We don't want it.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jip99 said:

 

 

It is no surprise that snowflakes, who can't handle democratic decisions going against them, are resorting to every underhand tactic they can muster.

 

Says a lot about them.

Traitors.

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Just kick us out. It is the EU who are the hold up.

You cannot read. it was the UK who asked for an extention.. twice.

 

European Council (Art. 50), 21/03/2019 - Consilium

21 Mar 2019 ... The EU27 leaders met on 21 March 2019 to discuss the latest ... Brexit: European Council adopts decision extending the period under Article …
 

Special European Council (Art.50), 10/04/2019 - Consilium

10 Apr 2019 ... EU27 leaders agreed to delay Brexit until 31 October 2019. ... Council decisionextending the period under Article 50 TEU, 11/04/2019 …
Posted
12 hours ago, fishtank said:

It was the British who wanted the backstop in the first place.

Plonker Boris don't seem to understand this.

If he and his muppets had voted for the deal months ago UK would be out by now.

Boris bounce in full swing. Tories 10 points ahead in latest polls.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, vogie said:

Even when the UK leaves the UK will probably still be contributing more than a lot of the other 27 states. So I can understand your anxiety about us leaving a sinking ship.

Yes, in the form of import duties levied on products from the UK. And.. see petrol products, cars, foods: a LOT more than the present UK contribution.

https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/taric/taric_consultation.jsp?Lang=en Cars: 10 %, lorries 20 %, much food products 10-15 %, petrol products: up to 20%.

So, financially seen, the EU should never have granted the UK an extension for Brexit.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Perhaps Eire and the EU will realise the same thing.

Maybe, but from a personal point of view, I would like to see Eire’s concerns over the Good Friday Agreement addressed to its satisfaction. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, geoffbezoz said:

[...] So GE taking place will ensure parliament passes a vote requiring Boris to seek a further extension of time beyond the 31st

Sorry but any further extension would also be at the decision of the UE 27 countries and french' s Macron ( and other few, i think) is still not in favor of it, like lot of peoples outside from UK ...

Sorry, but British have to deal with themselves first.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, transam said:

Who forbids metric units....?

 

The USA uses MPH, weigh in pounds, but their threads have been metric for over 30 years...Sorry, but you really do not know what you are talking about...

see in google with "Jacob Rees-Mogg Use imperial measurements" 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9595040/jacob-rees-mogg-rule-book-esquire/

https://www.ft.com/content/e0556f76-afc6-11e9-8030-530adfa879c2  

Edited by puipuitom
Posted
19 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Maybe, but from a personal point of view, I would like to see Eire’s concerns over the Good Friday Agreement addressed to its satisfaction. 

but you are not leaving the EU

to stop the UK from leaving would be Tyranny

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AGareth2 said:

but you are not leaving the EU

to stop the UK from leaving would be Tyranny

Where did I advocate stopping the uk leaving?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Loiner said:

We've already seen that the government's prophecies on Brexit were untrue from the day after the referendum. George Osborne's for example, or Mark Carney's if you consider him as part of the govt machine. 

Didn't know brexit has been effectuated already.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, stephenterry said:

Get real, Loiner. The above is a load of nonsense as can be proven by the UK government's own published statistical information on the adverse effects of Brexit. Wait and wake up to the reality if Brexit happens. 

 

Some people...

Loiner wouldn't pass the JRM grammar test - but then he probably went to a 'poor school' rather than Eton.  These guys that are taking on the elites for the benefit of the British working class.  Jolly good of them to help out those less fortunate than themselves. 

 

Image result for eton toffs

 

eton.png

Edited by beautifulthailand99
Posted
17 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Loiner wouldn't pass the JRM grammar test - but then he probably went to a 'poor school' rather than Eton.  These guys that are taking on the elites for the benefit of the British working class.  Jolly good of them to help out those less fortunate than themselves. 

 

Image result for eton toffs

 

eton.png

Looking at the picture of young toffs there reminds me that the French were right about the guillotine, and the Russians serfs right to eliminate their own parasitic aristocracy. Sadly this option is not currently available.

Posted

 

1) For the EU, the worst outcome is not a no-deal Brexit. It’s putting the single market at risk. 

 

2) For the UK, a no-deal Brexit is the worst outcome. That’s why parliament will prevent it at all cost. 

 

3) A no-deal Brexit is more worse for the UK than for the EU as well. 

 

Thus, there will be no no-deal Brexit. It’s not rocket science to see that. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...