Jump to content

Elon Musk could face defamation retrial as Brit diver's lawyer claims jury blundered


Recommended Posts

Posted

Who cares really!!

The UK scanner has already made a fortune off the press and he is making more everyday this endless and boring story continues.

He probably has enough money to retire should he wish.

Who knows he may be propping up a bar stool in LOS very soon.

  • Sad 1
Posted
5 hours ago, MasterBaker said:

i could understand that Brit will need to pay legal fees one way or another

I thought Vern was on a no win, no fee contract.

Posted
4 hours ago, ttrd said:

Hmm, Unsworth is the only one who still lives in the quarrel and that long after it ended. Now he tops it with greed and this he managed on his own - Do we see signs of attention urge ... ????

You might but not everybody else does.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, warrima said:

As i suspected Vernon has not come out of this looking good. Transcripts from his cross examination showed he had sent a significant number of sms relating to the rescue effort and the Musk case. They indicated he was planing to sue pretty much from day 1. He was very rude about the navy seals in one message using the bovine insult and refused interviews unless he was getting paid, telling them to FO if no payment was forthcoming. Also appears he had an agent scouting for (paid) opportunities while the rescue was still ongoing. The claim that Musk was promptly asked to leave the rescue site (Verns CNN interview) - was a straight up lie. On the contrary Musk was inside the cave for an hour with a high level thai official working on Plan B. A space x engineer (who Vern met) was looking for an alternative route for the sub to use.

 

All paints a picture that Vern was the one eyeing financial opportunities from the Cave Rescue. 

It might paint a picture for you but for me it is a painting by numbers picture with a lot of the numbers missing and a lot of numbers and paints mixed up.

  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Dice Man said:

Ah! I understand now! Its perfectly ok to call Americans " PEDO GUY!!

Hello PEDO Guys ...cold this morning?

No i dont think you do understand.

He didnt say it's ok to call all Americans pedos.

Maybe read again...

He said there was no tangable damage to Vern

One of the main requirements in a defamation lawsuit.

This whole suit was a farce.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, hugh2121 said:

Unsworth should take his case to the Thai court. Jail time for Musk.

 

If that's how Thailand treated those who would magnanimously spend tens of thousands of dollars and sleepless nights to try to help Thai boys stuck in a Thai cave, I don't suppose that anyone would like to help again.  Musk was not against Thai people--why should they be against him?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, monkfish said:

Well that's Unbelievable! My opinion of him just dropped 1 level lower and it was already low.
Really is that what Heroes do lol.

Do you believe @warrima's post?

If so why has nobody else mentioned anything about the GoPro camera?

I believe that Vern had one as many of the other rescuers did. It would be a sort of sensible thing to use in cave diving and potholing.

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, billd766 said:

It might paint a picture for you but for me it is a painting by numbers picture with a lot of the numbers missing and a lot of numbers and paints mixed up.

Go read his texts! Monkfish has posted a link to some. Also google the court transcripts from his examination. Much of Verns focus was on monetization through interviews, book deals and movie deals. He even disses some of the (real) divers because they proceeded with interviews without him.  

  • Like 2
Posted
31 minutes ago, hugh2121 said:

Unsworth should take his case to the Thai court. Jail time for Musk.

 

 

before that to the united states supreme court

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Do you believe @warrima's post?

If so why has nobody else mentioned anything about the GoPro camera?

I believe that Vern had one as many of the other rescuers did. It would be a sort of sensible thing to use in cave diving and potholing.

Check post 94 just above I mean previous page now.

Edited by monkfish
Posted
5 hours ago, Sticky Wicket said:

There is a difference between name calling and inferring paedophilia! 

That shìt sticks!

I think it has all blown out of proportion 

if old mate got called that in the pub he would shake it off with some expletives, I see a money grab, if this slight was so terrible he would have to go to therapy and all the rest of drug induced functionality.

I am sure walking around Thailand he is just another farang.

Posted
1 minute ago, leeneeds said:

I think it has all blown out of proportion 

if old mate got called that in the pub he would shake it off with some expletives, I see a money grab, if this slight was so terrible he would have to go to therapy and all the rest of drug induced functionality.

I am sure walking around Thailand he is just another farang.

It plays into the general perception abroad that Thailand is a haven for pedo guys, like it or not

  • Like 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, warrima said:

Go read his texts! Monkfish has posted a link to some. Also google the court transcripts from his examination. Much of Verns focus was on monetization through interviews, book deals and movie deals. He even disses some of the (real) divers because they proceeded with interviews without him.  

Yea and probably why you won't see him in any film coz they refused his fee.
Lol and this is the guy we gave the MBE such low standards these days.

Posted
5 hours ago, Sticky Wicket said:

There is a difference between name calling and inferring paedophilia! 

That shìt sticks!

I seem to remember that Pete Townshend was arrested, plead guilty, and placed on the sex offenders registry in brit land for child porn.... I think he's still regarded as a top class musician.... don't hear the child porn thing discussed much anymore...

 

After a few years, Vern "the pedo guy" will be forgotten

Posted
31 minutes ago, AsianAtHeart said:

If that's how Thailand treated those who would magnanimously spend tens of thousands of dollars and sleepless nights to try to help Thai boys stuck in a Thai cave, I don't suppose that anyone would like to help again.  Musk was not against Thai people--why should they be against him?

Small change to a billionaire. Potential advertising? Enormous.

Posted (edited)

The American jury trial is inherently biased according to the likes and dislikes of American jurors.The psychology of jurors everywhere (especially those who are not so bright or not so educated, is to make decisions based on body type, facial type and occupation rather than intellectual ability.

 

I have no doubt the Musk knew exactly whet he was saying and exactly what he was implying. He is also used to influencing people by the force of his own personality (vide persona). He is in very sore need a substantial bring-down.

 

Many people think that hyenas are ugly animals with ugly natures. Nevertheless, there are some folk who consider them beautiful.

 

Edited by ParkerN
Posted
1 hour ago, HHTel said:

 

From what I understand from the story at it's outset.  Mr. Unsworth was only claiming 70,000 (just over 2 million baht) as that was the minimum claim for it to go to court.  The higher figures came from the lawyers.  I don't believe that Mr. Unsworth's intention was to get mega-rich from the case.

No that was just a trick in the wording and was in fact a minimum of $70,000 of course the lawyers would have got their cut but Unsworth would have the rest.

Posted
8 hours ago, Time Traveller said:

Sounds like his lawyer just found another way to scam more money in lawyer fees out of poor ol' Vern.

 

I doubt very much that poor Vern will be paying any lawyer fees. I imagine it will be a no win no fee basis, hence the stupidly high damages sum claimed, and the pursuit of a new hearing.

 

That is unless Vern has more money than sense.....

Posted
6 hours ago, MarcB said:

 

 

Or did Musk hit a personal snare by calling some 5 minute famer a pedo?

Are you making an accusation that a poster whom you replied to is a pedo?

Posted
7 hours ago, BestB said:

Yes, because you are not implicating them directly. How readers interpret what they read is individually based on their perceptions , education and expectations .

 

one sentence can have 100 different meanings to 100 different people 

The tweet that Musk used just had the one meaning and its quite clear  what Musk was saying, and to who 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...