Another one that is starting to be used in ever increasing cycles,

Run Forest RUN!!

And with no discernable critique of why they would come out with such a comment, although in itself it is self-explanetory, that is not the point!

Good Luck

Moss

Another one that is starting to be used in ever increasing cycles,

Run Forest RUN!!

And with no discernable critique of why they would come out with such a comment, although in itself it is self-explanetory, that is not the point!

Good Luck

Moss

Too many letters to type, Moss. Here are my emoticons for run forrest run:

Edited April 2, 200719 yr by Jet Gorgon

Another one that is starting to be used in ever increasing cycles,

Run Forest RUN!!

And with no discernable critique of why they would come out with such a comment, although in itself it is self-explanetory, that is not the point!

Good Luck

Moss

They'll shorten it to RFR soon enough

is that a question or a cliche. If it was a question then yes. Look at my joining date. If it was a cliche - then great timing...

WHen I typed it I wasn't sure, but before posting I looked your profiles myself.

WHen I returned to (change my) post it seemed particularly appropriate all the same.

Some great replies here, I never knew there was so many things that upset us!

Another one that just slightly gets my goat:

When someone states they have just bought some land, meaning they have bought it thru their Wife and being optimistic about the relationship calls it the Royal we......

They will almost be killed in the rush of people screaming

" YOU CAN'T OWN LAND "

Good Luck

Moss

Just like the know-it-alls who did something in Thailand five years ago (importing household goods f.e.) and insist that the way they did it those days is the only right way...ignoring that the laws might have changed and continue changing.

Not a cliche, but the overuse of emoticons really annoys me.

Especially this one:

Seriously... use some imagination.

Really? That's one of my favourites!

It is a high-quality emoticon, indeed, expressing subtle irony.

Sorry but I thought the terms "subtle" and "irony" did not belong here in Bedlam.

In yer face p1ss taking maybe, but no!

those who have to include the previous three posts (or more) and then add something totally stupid like 'som na naa'. So, to recap, stretching the page widthways and making me scroll down and down and down makes my blood boil. I love expressions like that, I always think of my Nanny - she was just like Arthur Mullard

Those who quote an entire previous reply and add their comments within the body of the quote without changing style, font or colour. So if you want to know what they're saying you have to play spot the difference.

Sorry that's not really a cliche.

How 'bout

Do not feed the Trolls.

Those who quote an entire previous reply and add their comments within the body of the quote without changing style, font or colour. So if you want to know what they're saying you have to play spot the difference.

even better are those who do not type anything in the reply, but just quote someone else.

even better are those who do not type anything in the reply, but just quote someone else.

Hadn't thought of that one, but that's definitely one of my hates. It makes you wonder what they're trying to say. Do they agree? Do they violently disagree? Have they no opinion at all?

even better are those who do not type anything in the reply, but just quote someone else.

Hadn't thought of that one, but that's definitely one of my hates. It makes you wonder what they're trying to say. Do they agree? Do they violently disagree? Have they no opinion at all?

I was so tempted to not type any comments here, but that would be purile!

I have often thought that they don't know how of what the function does, newbies or ludites maybe?

even better are those who do not type anything in the reply, but just quote someone else.

Hadn't thought of that one, but that's definitely one of my hates. It makes you wonder what they're trying to say. Do they agree? Do they violently disagree? Have they no opinion at all?

I was so tempted to not type any comments here, but that would be purile!

I have often thought that they don't know how of what the function does, newbies or ludites maybe?

Does anyone do the same as I do ..... read the whole quoted text to see if there are any differences or words made bold to emphasise a point of view.

I used to, now I don't bother .... if I see a box that fills the entire post..... I just close the window.

Is stalking a cliche ?

Second time you made me LOL and ROTFLMAO

Cheers,

Yours truly,

Cliche but true

Sorry that's not really a cliche.

How 'bout

Do not feed the Trolls.

Those who quote an entire previous reply and add their comments within the body of the quote without changing style, font or colour. So if you want to know what they're saying you have to play spot the difference.

Hadn't thought of that one, but that's definitely one of my hates. It makes you wonder what they're trying to say. Do they agree? Do they violently disagree? Have they no opinion at all?

I was so tempted to not type any comments here, but that would be purile!

I have often thought that they don't know how of what the function does, newbies or ludites maybe?

Does anyone do the same as I do ..... read the whole quoted text to see if there are any differences or words made bold to emphasise a point of view.

I used to, now I don't bother .... if I see a box that fills the entire post..... I just close the window.

So did anybody actually say anything in all that?

:D

Er, no!

What about Bedlam cliches?

Welcoming members before they reach 500 posts! (remember Limbo)

What about Bedlam cliches?

Welcoming members before they reach 500 posts! (remember Limbo)

a really bad habit! I feel so much singled out since no one wrote me a welcome thread!

That was soon remedied, quit yer whining!!

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=114497

Edited April 4, 200719 yr by The Dan Sai Kid

What about Bedlam cliches?

Welcoming members before they reach 500 posts! (remember Limbo)

a really bad habit! I feel so much singled out since no one wrote me a welcome thread!

Did you network before you entered Bedlam, Raro? You gotta network or nobody will welcome you, because they don't know what you can do for them today.

Here's one - What's the first rule of TV moderation?

erm, something to do with respect

nuff said, big up respect to the TV massive!!!

Here's one - What's the first rule of TV moderation?

We do not discuss moderation issues!

What about Bedlam cliches?

Welcoming members before they reach 500 posts! (remember Limbo)

a really bad habit! I feel so much singled out since no one wrote me a welcome thread!

Did you network before you entered Bedlam, Raro? You gotta network or nobody will welcome you, because they don't know what you can do for them today.

:D

Absolutely. Jet, my well connected pal. But of course with all the strands in your hair, you stood a distinct advantage over Raro, as all those strands connected to a myriad of threads around the annals of this here board.

Here's one - What's the first rule of TV moderation?

euhm... a six pack on the go and one in the fridge?

Those who quote an entire previous reply and add their comments within the body of the quote without changing style, font or colour. So if you want to know what they're saying you have to play spot the difference.

even better are those who do not type anything in the reply, but just quote someone else.

Just thought I'd second (or third or whatever) that because I have been following one

thread (on the need to have an onward ticket on entry at a land border) so when I see

a new post I check and find the Einstein has done exactly as described above.

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?sh...amp;st=60

Haven't used any pissed off and angry emoticons for a while so

:D

(NB for the picky amongst you I did NOT whistle)

Edited April 4, 200719 yr by farangsay

KY, why do always laugh more at the femae member posts?

First soph, now Jet, look out NR!

Another one that occured to me, is when members refer to their kids and feel the need to call them my lukkrung, instead of my son/daughter.

Seems like they are objectifying their children somewhat.

IMHO of course

Same goes for "my TG" . Excuse me, but do I type "my TH" ??

Did someone type that cliche already?

My other personal favorite (being a woman) is being told that because I disagree with some man I must hate men. Or I am a feminazi.

Another one that occured to me, is when members refer to their kids and feel the need to call them my lukkrung, instead of my son/daughter.

Seems like they are objectifying their children somewhat.

IMHO of course

Same goes for "my TG" . Excuse me, but do I type "my TH" ??

Did someone type that cliche already?

My other personal favorite (being a woman) is being told that because I disagree with some man I must hate men. Or I am a feminazi.

Oh, thought that was my claim to fame! That's the one I get all the time. There was one thread in General Topics about 3 weeks ago where one member said something mildly sexist. Another member quoted it with the line underneath "November Rain, Jet Gorgon, are you going to let him get away with that?" I nearly killed myself laughing. I was seriously tempted to quote the whole lot & just write "Yep!" underneath.

However, you did get a very vehement one in ladies forum a few days ago, I noticed. Fun guy he was. Think there were some real issues there...