Jump to content

Phrae PM2.5 Numbers 2020


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Jan 25-II

 

Interesting read from Worasom Kundhikanjana:

 

https://towardsdatascience.com/identifying-the-sources-of-winter-air-pollution-in-bangkok-part-i-d4392ea608dc -   7 min / Part I

https://towardsdatascience.com/identifying-the-sources-of-winter-air-pollution-in-bangkok-part-ii-72539f9b767a -   9 min / Part II

 

" Conclusion

The PM 2.5 level has a complex relationship with various factors: number of fires, weather patterns, and traffic. But this analysis confirms the suspicion that many people have — agricultural burning is the root cause of PM 2.5 pollution in Thailand. Burning activities as far as 720 km away from Bangkok, an area which extends into Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia, can cause air problems in Bangkok. Solving this problem will not be easy. It will require a collaborative international effort among the Southeast Asian countries. "

 

Thanks to 'seb2015' posting the links in

https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1142080-bangkok-air-pollution-2020/

 

Edited by Yom
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Jan 26

 

Usually you don't smell it,

if you see it, it might be haze, mist, early morning fog.

But it is dust. Today a lot of it in our area...

 

image.png.7818d855aa0e744f29052f1e69d5a22f.pngimage.png.0e56ef810345e9520be4bd287fc77edb.png

 

image.png.e14a7d89bc5a01843fcff1efe189e25a.png  image.png.3dc81cdb979559b91c256fd8ff9fe94d.png

 

image.png.638ca70d6184059614e7cc1f8594dcb0.png

Would be interesting to know when the powerplant starts working.

 

Posted

Jan 27

 

This morning 05:00

PHRAE 185

LAMPANG 220

HPH Ta See Lampang 441

(from. aqicn.org)

 

In our house/Phrae 260-290 night

Posted

Jan 27

 

Today

 

image.png.19efb878473eca0fd46b8a0097cc6f84.png

image.png.8d3d23bd3bccaaef83ea0e588565bd91.pngimage.png.115f764afcf4e00f6e700f6e37cb3161.png

Screenshot 11:12   Ta-See 441                              12:00 no more 'Ta see'

 

 

image.png.125f8461cc1775feca302f909406de67.pngimage.png.895ba24f0b5ebf21fe8b84fbe4ea6ddc.png

Phrae 4:46                                                8:31

 

image.png.aef2a757b8cf04f00c7ed95152d482b9.pngimage.png.6064fbb0dd781e7c0af3154fe76eda63.png

Phrae 8:48                                               9:54  North of Phrae - 20 km

 

 

image.png.f7db50ef5cb646cb3892c3be84a19d6b.png Phrae 9:27 near Imm. Office

 

image.png.9937b6e3652941bd396fba5ad9539b8a.png Phrae 9:27 near Imm. Office

                                                   **************************

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Yom said:

Jan 27

 

Today

 

image.png.19efb878473eca0fd46b8a0097cc6f84.png

image.png.8d3d23bd3bccaaef83ea0e588565bd91.pngimage.png.115f764afcf4e00f6e700f6e37cb3161.png

Screenshot 11:12   Ta-See 441                              12:00 no more 'Ta see'

 

 

image.png.125f8461cc1775feca302f909406de67.pngimage.png.895ba24f0b5ebf21fe8b84fbe4ea6ddc.png

Phrae 4:46                                                8:31

 

image.png.aef2a757b8cf04f00c7ed95152d482b9.pngimage.png.6064fbb0dd781e7c0af3154fe76eda63.png

Phrae 8:48                                               9:54  North of Phrae - 20 km

 

 

image.png.f7db50ef5cb646cb3892c3be84a19d6b.png Phrae 9:27 near Imm. Office

 

image.png.9937b6e3652941bd396fba5ad9539b8a.png Phrae 9:27 near Imm. Office

 

                                                   **************************

 

Sorry to hear that - crikey that is almost off the scale. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Jan 28 

 

Nothing to say, it's grey, milky grey outside the whole day.

The PM2.5 levels were around 280 in the morning,

came down to 100 in the late afternoon and now?

... I'm too lazy(?) to have a look.

Posted (edited)

Jan 29

 

AQI last night seems under 200. - Phrae at 8:00 shows 199.

At our place 20 km north of Phrae this morning a bit over 200.

Very cold, 16 C./60 F.

 

image.png.7cd93d3e8233430fae9711de3b01e84a.png

image.png.c63aaf99a8919c976887f5ae8acd2a33.png

 

Today's 'winner':

1.  Phrao in the North   -   387  at 9:00

2.  Saraburi north of BKK   -   358  at 8:00  

3.  Sam Ngao Hospital, near Tak   -   335  at 10:00

 

 

Edited by Yom
Posted (edited)

Jan 29-II

 

aqicn.org, they are joking, aren't they?

I'm afraid somebody might be already sitting/watching in my computer?

But here a screenshot:

 

image.png.c1dcd766c97482688027dac4e43289f2.png

Btw, I didn't change to Italic and to smaller size!?

 

So why don't add another screenshot?

image.png.1ee29d058b0bb2b854cb97a3b085e7d1.png

 

 

 

Edited by Yom
Posted

Jan 30

 

Almost the same situation as yesterday.  image.png.ac13f79913fd741d1d09d43e18c22d1d.png

The winner today again Phrao.

But a lot of other unhealthy areas:

Chiang Mai

Lampang

Mae Sot

Kanchanaburi

most of Bangkok moderate

                                                

  • Like 1
Posted

Interesting curves, smog and virus related? - Exception AUS suffering from the fires.

 

image.png.02e0f2d07c637e12eddd1d807a4e9af9.pngUSD  image.png.15ab6aef62f3872b062f7977f2ba230a.pngGBP

image.png.7db7d4716512882d82e48070daa3731b.pngEUR  image.png.95910e47fbf67355da7de0e6400228c9.pngAUD

image.png.0a924ba94337f7e72ffbade368c39640.pngCAD

Posted

Jan 31 

 

Since yesterday afternoon much 'better',  AQI 80 - 120.

Today at noon Phrae city 60, in the village 90 - 100.

aqicn shows 178 for Phrae(?), AirVisual 135.

[ of course, always depending on time and place ]

image.png.8226d31fb0afc3c6be9c0a8b067b05fb.png  image.png.e969a472904440120de329939132f82f.png

image.png.c1e0adf627232117a5c39cf074228317.png Phrae 12:00 AQI 165

Posted

Jan 31-II

 

Another (basic)website:

 

1.   http://www.aqmthai.com/aqi.php?lang=en

image.png.e77328d1578592acbbd52ea89cbed53d.png

click on the calendar for the date-next box for the time-then 'ok'

 

 

2.   http://www.aqmthai.com/public_report.php

Here you'll find all the stations reporting hourly.

There is always a table and sometimes a graph version.

[the Thai names: compare with #1 or copy&paste into some translator]

image.png.024ed2b6839c35fb79af158b36560144.png

This for Phrae69t image.png.f5e92a5980843891a34fe9373bb97f73.png

 

image.png

Posted

Feb 1

 

2,000 views until today,  very impressing. - Thank You.

I would be happy about any additional contribution...  

Red, red, red, almost all Thailand. - Phrae too, 173 at noon.

 

image.png.3d6d2d03a639f47a65633fde07aba24b.png  image.png.d475d8a44bd92fdc9526f1b4a60f1569.png Today's WWWinners

 

 

Posted

Feb 1-II

 

berkeleyearth.org had technical problems since Jan 26.

Now there is are maps of today, 6:00 ICT.

image.png.4124c64750188fec3132a31538c9b17c.png  image.png.77fe67d1756b4a20f83f1866a64e3c7e.png impressive?

Posted

Feb 3

 

Thailand mostly red, AQI 191 in Chiang Muan - between

Phayao and Nan. Higher PM2.5 levels too in the South:

Phuket(82), Surat Thani(112) and Hat Yai(147), today 11:00.

Phrae 171  image.png.4d1f5b3ab93e76bf7c89f46168f709e6.png

 

image.png.6fe0ca30cf8a30c62ac3b455b9a00971.pngimage.png.1eeeec35beb8f8415498939589654735.png

Where there is smoke there must be fire...

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Feb 3-II

 

Phrae and the North much better in the afternoon,

Bangkok stays red:

image.png.b6123e01983fa094d71015106c98a50f.png              image.png.2bbb06c3ca859426c66de16ebb596b8c.png

that's an AQI of 112, 89, 93.

Links:  http://www.aqmthai.com/public_report.php

https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.calculator

 

Posted (edited)

Feb 4

 

Phrae 9:00 AQI PM2.5  171

image.png.3b147ae3da3a038f0804b503ebd7acf5.png  image.png.dff1b90805e5fc228420bac3f80535ae.png                                                          Thailand in Red

https://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.calculator -   aqicn.org

 

Not good today, but might be worse:

image.png.d5c51330faa3547534b753f87c43dc88.png     image.png.53dcdd68cfbbcfb32614c915e0c84e82.png                                                                             

 

                                      ***************************

 

Edited by Yom
Layout
Posted (edited)

Feb 4-II

 

TH-North a bit better, BKK remains mostly red.

But other parts of the world today, better or not? - all same scale

image.png.1a2a79b0f30ac4cc47e6f5599b588cec.pngimage.png.d00a66a764d4a4db2fc6db1b51a306e8.png

 

Here we are:

image.png.8b45f658cc237c550a27e5bb23c4a62b.png

Edited by Yom
Posted
On 1/16/2020 at 10:05 AM, 4MyEgo said:

1) Turn on a good quality air purifier with HEPA filter

 

My Xiaomi purifier seems to be struggling in night mode lately. I have to run it at high for PM to be at acceptable levels.

 

As of now it is hovering at around 35 in night mode. It's a 7sqm bedroom.

 

Is this normal?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Pravda said:

 

My Xiaomi purifier seems to be struggling in night mode lately. I have to run it at high for PM to be at acceptable levels.

 

As of now it is hovering at around 35 in night mode. It's a 7sqm bedroom.

 

Is this normal?

Yes it is normal, my room last night was around 35 as well and I live in the bush.

 

It is now at the time of writing this at 33-35 up and down, although the room is big enough for me to feel comfortable 48m2 with 3 metre ceilings, a little cough here and there but I am not struggling to breathe, that said, when I have bronchitis things change of course.

 

I do put on the air purifier before bed as it was around 44-45 last night, an the kids room around 50, so once it gets down to under a reading of 12 off she goes.

 

Is your room sealed, I mean does any air get in that can add to the increase, mine are as sealed as can be, but at the end of the day some air has to get in.

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Pravda said:

 

My Xiaomi purifier seems to be struggling in night mode lately. I have to run it at high for PM to be at acceptable levels.

 

As of now it is hovering at around 35 in night mode. It's a 7sqm bedroom.

 

Is this normal?

something seems not to be right.

i do not thing your bedroom is only 7 sqm ... 3 x 2.5m??

 

since a few months i am using air purifiers, my aim (for the bedrooms) is

to be under 10 µg/m3 ! 

Posted (edited)

Feb 5

 

Thailand-News today:

Virus related 8 subjects - Air pollution 0

Bangkok - live webcam:

https://www.skylinewebcams.com/en/webcam/thailand/central-thailand/bangkok/bangkok-crossroads.html

AQI Phrae 171 - most parts up north 150 - 180.    

Chiang Muan high again(199). - Why?                             

Saraburi high too(257). - Why?   -   At 11:00 down to 71.

image.png.18064a30779e2f636b428d133c51f300.pngNa Phralan PoliceStation

 

image.png.5dcaa32329785fcb3570d17152bcbe10.png    

                 

By the way - AQI 150 corresponds to 55.4 ug/m3

                         180             "          111.6 ug/m3

 

Edited by Yom
Posted

Feb 6

 

The wind blew it away, at least a bit.

Where the children of tomorrow dream away in the wind of change?

image.png.1fe9d3906073c0027cfb5b503d53433d.pngimage.png.1fed85a8c9c98e359bb9329565c41697.png

ventusky.com   -   winds               windy.com   -   here: PM2.5  

 

AQI Phrae at 11:00  156  -  many northern stations not reporting

The Capital better:  97 - 151

image.png.882c925e3447e2b16b7fe0153a84b72d.png aqicn.org

 

                                         *******************************

 

Posted

Feb 6-II

 

A little help with ug/m3 and AQI      image.png.1bb4d80d56c7df641f582e537eaf2956.png

My monitor shows 29, so this should be AQI 87.

Below 20 ug/m3 would be nice. (An old wooden house is not to insulate.)

Above 55 ug/m3: not healthy.

More information in the attached Excel paper. It's a trial version.

 

 

2020-02-06 ugm3 - AQI.xlsx

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Yom said:

 

....

Below 20 ug/m3 would be nice. (An old wooden house is not to insulate.)

Above 55 ug/m3: not healthy.

....

 

according to the WHO :

 

who Kopie.png

Edited by motdaeng
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, motdaeng

 

' Small particulate pollution has health impacts even at very low concentrations – indeed no threshold has been identified below which no damage to health is observed. Therefore, the WHO 2005 guideline limits aimed to achieve the lowest concentrations of PM possible. '

[https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health]

 

I would be happy (and satisfied) with 10 μg/m3 24-hour mean. But this is an illusion.

 

By the way, I'm not worried about myself. - I think of the little children, the elderly and the frail and all those people who cannot or can never afford to buy an air purifier.

Ignorance and arrogance might be a minor problem. I don't know.

Posted

Feb 7

 

Phrae AQI 161 - that means 75 μg/m3 .

The North 'Unhealthy'.

Bangkok and other places in Thailand 'Unhealthy' respectively

'Unhealthy for sensitive groups'.

Sorry, Surat Thani 'moderate' (AQI 85) and Phuket AQI 55.

 

image.png.6be584d41719c3724af30a62657a17ac.png

 

                                    *******************************

Posted

Feb 7-II

 

https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1146987-strict-no-burn-zone-measures-to-be-implemented-in-north/#comments

 

But it's much too late.

 

Of nine northern provinces, eight have been declared as strict burn-free areas.

1 Chiang Mai has forbidden burning from January 10 to April 30.

2 Phrae has announced a strict ban on burning from February 1 to April 30.

 

3 Nan province has banned burning from February 15 to April 15.

4. Phayao, Tak, Lamphun, and Lampang provinces have been declared absolute no-burning areas from March 1 to April 30.

5 Mae Hong Son is strictly forbidding fires from March 15 to April 30.

Chiang Rai is monitoring the trend of disaster situations to issue guidelines on no-burn zones later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...