2 hours ago, TheDark said:

 

Can’t see any hate there, just an inconvenient truth. Seemed to upset some with a sensitive nature though. We can thank Nigel for bringing this to the attention of the voters who are still being bombarded with lefty luvvies offering other people’s accommodations and benefits to the hordes. No more EU route and quotas for the UK. 

Never liked this guy, but we are less than 24 hours away from complete and total freedom and indentured servitude. God Save The Queen!

39 minutes ago, Somtamnication said:

Never liked this guy, but we are less than 24 hours away from complete and total freedom and indentured servitude. God Save The Queen!

God save us all.

57 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

God save us all.

Land of hope and glory, mother of the free.

Rule Brittania.

44 minutes ago, colinneil said:

Land of hope and glory, mother of the free.

Rule Brittania.

 

Empire strikes back!

 

Can spot Nelson in full regalia just down the alley

and Hornblower sneeking around the corner . . . .

 

12 hours ago, TheDark said:

 

So, Can't back up what you said. No surprise there.

On 1/30/2020 at 11:20 AM, tomacht8 said:

As a member of the EU parlament, he was responsible for the well-being of all EU member states (including the UK).

 

His result:

- Massive currency losses

- Geostrategic weakening of the UK and the EU

- The lives of millions of people are brought into economic insecurity.

- The planning security of many companies and jobs bought at risk.

- The climate of cooperation between the UK and the remaining 27 EU countries deteriorated.

- Enormous amounts of time and resources wasted.

 

And to answer your question:

That is not a positive thing for me.

And I wouldn't do that to my country.

His result my back end! You really think that Farage had any sway on EU policy? 

On 1/31/2020 at 8:37 AM, melvinmelvin said:

 

Empire strikes back!

 

Can spot Nelson in full regalia just down the alley

and Hornblower sneeking around the corner . . . .

 

Hornblower's having a smoke with Farage!

On 1/31/2020 at 11:24 AM, billd766 said:

So, Can't back up what you said. No surprise there.

I can and I already did. I'm not responsible if you didn't get the message. 

 

57 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Hornblower's having a smoke with Farage!

that is OK as long as they don't play with fags . . .

 

On 1/31/2020 at 4:30 AM, Loiner said:

Can’t see any hate there, just an inconvenient truth. Seemed to upset some with a sensitive nature though. We can thank Nigel for bringing this to the attention of the voters who are still being bombarded with lefty luvvies offering other people’s accommodations and benefits to the hordes. No more EU route and quotas for the UK. 

It was a lie. There was no basis in fact that refugees / asylum seekers would be permitted entry to the UK via 'Open Borders'.

14 hours ago, simple1 said:

It was a lie. There was no basis in fact that refugees / asylum seekers would be permitted entry to the UK via 'Open Borders'.

All true. Nigel has saved us. They already arrive on the beaches through EU open borders, in many cases with the EU holding the gates open for them. Frau Merkel wants us to have more of hers too.

13 hours ago, Loiner said:

All true. Nigel has saved us. They already arrive on the beaches through EU open borders, in many cases with the EU holding the gates open for them. Frau Merkel wants us to have more of hers too.

Sure will be illegals, but to repeat no 'Open Borders' for refugees and asylum seekers, Farage was a liar as were a number of others in the leave campaign. Hopefully UK will not suffer any major negatives during the Brexit exit processes in the coming months.

15 hours ago, simple1 said:

Sure will be illegals, but to repeat no 'Open Borders' for refugees and asylum seekers, Farage was a liar as were a number of others in the leave campaign. Hopefully UK will not suffer any major negatives during the Brexit exit processes in the coming months.

There would have been as soon as their legal status was regularlised. The other EU nations would have been more than happy to pass them on to the UK through the Open Borders or by any other means. Do you honestly believe that Italy, Greece etc would keep them all forever???    

 

2 hours ago, Loiner said:

There would have been as soon as their legal status was regularlised. The other EU nations would have been more than happy to pass them on to the UK through the Open Borders or by any other means. Do you honestly believe that Italy, Greece etc would keep them all forever???    

 

Hypothetical. However, the number of vetted refugees permitted entry into the UK would still have been under the authority of HMG. A very different proposition to that inferred by Farage.

14 hours ago, simple1 said:

Hypothetical. However, the number of vetted refugees permitted entry into the UK would still have been under the authority of HMG. A very different proposition to that inferred by Farage.

Nothing hypothetical about the EU redistribution plan. The Remainers and sympathisers in HMG would have tried to allow as many as possible under the EU banner. 

9 hours ago, Loiner said:

Nothing hypothetical about the EU redistribution plan. The Remainers and sympathisers in HMG would have tried to allow as many as possible under the EU banner. 

Usual opinionated nonsense. Refugee resettlement quota numbers p.a. are set in advance by the Home Office.

On 2/4/2020 at 10:34 PM, simple1 said:

Usual opinionated nonsense. Refugee resettlement quota numbers p.a. are set in advance by the Home Office.

Yes, I know but you still keep posting it don’t you. 
Were we still an EU member they would be set by Brussels and accepted by Home Office europhiles. That won’t be happening now. 

2 hours ago, Loiner said:

Yes, I know but you still keep posting it don’t you. 
Were we still an EU member they would be set by Brussels and accepted by Home Office europhiles. That won’t be happening now. 

Good to see you finally accept reality check. However, again misinformation by you e.g..

 

Britain has refused to take part in the scheme, having separately promised to resettle 4,000 refugees this year and 20,000 over five years – the first few of whom arrived on Tuesday, the UK government announced without giving details.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/22/eu-governments-divisive-quotas-deal-share-120000-refugees

As yet another page has wandered off topic here's something seen yesterday...

 

UK statement on irregular migration

On 2/5/2020 at 5:34 AM, simple1 said:

Usual opinionated nonsense. Refugee resettlement quota numbers p.a. are set in advance by the Home Office.

But is that quota under legal resettlement or does it mean the illegals as well?

 

If you think that his post is usual opinionated nonsense.

 

Why don't you post some links to back up what you posted?

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

But is that quota under legal resettlement or does it mean the illegals as well?

 

If you think that his post is usual opinionated nonsense.

 

Why don't you post some links to back up what you posted?

"Illegals' more often than not are visa over stayers and are not classified as refugees / asylum seekers by HMG. However, under UK law positively vetted asylum seekers / refugees cannot be prosecuted for illegal entry to the UK e.g. trafficked. 

 

If a member makes a claim should they should back up with a credible link, not just opinion, not for me to disprove. In this case, FYI, there are many credible sources for numbers of resettled refugees, policies and so on in the UK. As an example....

 

https://fullfact.org/immigration/how-many-refugees-does-uk-take/

Edited February 7, 20206 yr by simple1

28 minutes ago, simple1 said:

"Illegals' more often than not are visa over stayers and are not classified as refugees / asylum seekers by HMG. However, under UK law positively vetted asylum seekers / refugees cannot be prosecuted for illegal entry to the UK e.g. trafficked. 

 

If a member makes a claim should they should back up with a credible link, not just opinion, not for me to disprove. In this case, FYI, there are many credible sources for numbers of resettled refugees, policies and so on in the UK. As an example....

 

https://fullfact.org/immigration/how-many-refugees-does-uk-take/

Anyone turning up uninvited having funded their way in this manner cannot seriously be expect to be treated other than as an economic migrant and should be backloaded immediately to their last safe haven (French point of departure?) or deported to their homeland or taken to a UN processing facility nearest to their homeland; Where possible not at UK's expence.

Edited February 7, 20206 yr by evadgib

2 hours ago, evadgib said:

Anyone turning up uninvited having funded their way in this manner cannot seriously be expect to be treated other than as an economic migrant and should be backloaded immediately to their last safe haven (French point of departure?) or deported to their homeland or taken to a UN processing facility nearest to their homeland; Where possible not at UK's expence.

International Conventions Rule of Law states otherwise. 

16 minutes ago, simple1 said:

International Conventions Rule of Law states otherwise. 

They also state quite clearly that refuse must be sought in the first safe haven. From there they can be processed by the UN.

Edited February 7, 20206 yr by evadgib

8 minutes ago, evadgib said:

They also state quite clearly that refuse must be sought in the first safe haven. From there they can be processed by the UN.

Incorrect. 

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

"Illegals' more often than not are visa over stayers and are not classified as refugees / asylum seekers by HMG. However, under UK law positively vetted asylum seekers / refugees cannot be prosecuted for illegal entry to the UK e.g. trafficked. 

 

If a member makes a claim should they should back up with a credible link, not just opinion, not for me to disprove. In this case, FYI, there are many credible sources for numbers of resettled refugees, policies and so on in the UK. As an example....

 

https://fullfact.org/immigration/how-many-refugees-does-uk-take/

How about this for a link and a fact about illegal immigrants from the BBC news website yesterday.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-51401115

 

Ninety migrants including children have been rescued from the English Channel, a record figure for a single day.

Eight small boats were earlier reported off the coast of Dover, one of which was carrying a group of 21 men.

Fifteen of the 90 "claimed to be minors", the Home Office said as it confirmed those rescued included nationals of Syria, Yemen and Mali.

Last year at least 1,892 arrived in Britain after crossing the Channel in boats.

French authorities have said 371 migrants attempted the crossing last month, with 95 of them succeeding.

35 minutes ago, simple1 said:

International Conventions Rule of Law states otherwise. 

Really? Show me where it says that.

 

I have even provided the link about it using the quote from you. Sadly as usual you forgot to provide a link, as usual.

 

https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/what-is-the-rule-of-law/

46 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Incorrect. 

They can't pick-and-choose their way illegally across multiple borders & turn up unannounced otherwise we'd all be doing it.

17 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Britain has refused to take part in the scheme, 

More of your opinionated europhile nonsense. 
If we remained in the EU we would have been forced into accepting some of Merkel’s millions under the EU redistribution plans. Any previous refusals would be swiftly ignored by Migrant loving EU apologists and virtue signallers throughout the government. 
 

Now that Nigel and his billboard has helped to save us from all that, the Remainers favourite villain should be given a knighthood. 

 

Btw, the Garuniad is not a credible source for links.