Jump to content

Battle of Iwo Jima 75 years on


webfact

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, tifino said:

... even Reuters can get it wrong...

I was about to leave a 'confused' emoji, which I would have regretted NOW that I went back and re-read the article. NOW I can see 'Reuters showed 70 years in one place and 75 years in another place.

I am embarrased that I almost claimed you wrong, when you are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

i OWE YOU A THANK YOU (AND SORRY) EMOJI.... AND WILL DO THAT NOW.   Cheers....

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tifino said:

... even Reuters can get it wrong...

 

2 minutes ago, kensawadee said:

I was about to leave a 'confused' emoji, which I would have regretted NOW that I went back and re-read the article. NOW I can see 'Reuters showed 70 years in one place and 75 years in another place.

I am embarrased that I almost claimed you wrong, when you are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

i OWE YOU A THANK YOU (AND SORRY) EMOJI.... AND WILL DO THAT NOW.   Cheers....

Both of you are wrong. Taken out of context below is the complete cation.

"FILE PHOTO: The flags of U.S. and Japan are hoisted as participants attend a memorial service jointly held by Japan and the United States to mark the 70th anniversary of one of World War II's bloodiest and most symbolic battles on the remote island of Iwo Jima, which is now officially called Iwo To in Japan, south of Tokyo March 21, 2015. REUTERS/Pool/File Photo

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kensawadee said:

NOW I am seeing that also, but if it wasn't for tifino's post you and I and him may have never seen that. So thanks to YOU also.

But the 2 different years in the article did lead to confusion in cases where we read something quickly and some small detail gets overlooked until our attention is focused more perfectly on it.

HOWEVER I think the 'SAD' emoji was over reacting and the explanation post you did was very eye-opening and explicit.... Thanks for your post. It clearly pointed out 'OUR ERROR' in reading.

it is called a Scotoma ???? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tifino said:

it is called a Scotoma ???? 

I HAD TO GOOGLE THAT.

A scotoma is an area of partial alteration in the field of vision consisting of a partially diminished or entirely degenerated visual acuity that is surrounded by a field of normal – or relatively well-preserved – vision.

Yes. I think we both got it....... LOL

But thanks to that kwaibah (My Thai translates that to crazy buffalo) 555.... we both have corrected our understanding of the article).   I an indebted to kwaibah but i still resent the 'SAD' emojis in such a innocent matter as this.  Cheers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, howbri said:

The "Greatest Generation" for sure. But don't doubt that there are many Americans capable of bravery today. We just don't see them in the socialist/globalist news media, but they are there.

 

It's the last war America had to win. If it happened again we would get out the whoop ass.  These days there isn't as defined an enemy and they tend to hide behind women and children. If we ever had to take the gloves off again and it was at the point it was winner takes all it would be the same. The modern enemy knows there are rules we are supposed to follow and constantly exploits them. 

 

My Grandfather drove an amphibious tank when we invaded Japan. My Grandmother was a nurse in the Navy.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Marine veteran of that battle left a captured Japanese flag to me upon his passing. The flag bears many signatures and may lead to his identity. I'm hoping the flag can be returned to a member of his close family.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...