Jump to content

Trump says he is halting World Health Organization funding over handling of coronavirus


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Peterw42 said:

Why is it that "the most powerful nation on Earth" isnt doing a great job fighting the virus, when smaller less powerful countries are doing ok ?

 

Seems the power doesn't equate to fighting a virus.

 

Maybe shoot the messenger and the world wont notice.

The great and "powerful" Oz will hide behind the curtain of money, good world democratic process, wonder why he never joined the diplomatic corps.

There needs to an INDEPENDENT investigation, untainted by bias, open and transparent  processes, and reporting to international court of justice, well removed from the great and powerful Oz

 

Edited by RJRS1301
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kevin612 said:

The Chinese figures are way too small. WHO should change the name to CHO. Stay safe, everyone.

And why do you think the numbers are too small?

 

But never mind, same discussion as before, never any real arguments, only suppositions.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Patong2 said:

This is the advice the WHO have on their website at the moment and gave out on the 6th January 2020

Looks like Trump has realised how incompetent or corrupt they are

 

Pneumonia of unknown cause – China

Disease outbreak news
5 January 2020

On 31 December 2019, the WHO China Country Office was informed of cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology (unknown cause) detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province of China. As of 3 January 2020, a total of 44 patients with pneumonia of unknown etiology have been reported to WHO by the national authorities in China. Of the 44 cases reported, 11 are severely ill, while the remaining 33 patients are in stable condition. According to media reports, the concerned market in Wuhan was closed on 1 January 2020 for environmental sanitation and disinfection.

The causal agent has not yet been identified or confirmed. On 1 January 2020, WHO requested further information from national authorities to assess the risk.

National authorities report that all patients are isolated and receiving treatment in Wuhan medical institutions. The clinical signs and symptoms are mainly fever, with a few patients having difficulty in breathing, and chest radiographs showing invasive lesions of both lungs.

According to the authorities, some patients were operating dealers or vendors in the Huanan Seafood market. Based on the preliminary information from the Chinese investigation team, no evidence of significant human-to-human transmission and no health care worker infections have been reported.

Public Health Response

National authorities have reported the following response measures:

  • One hundred and twenty-one close contacts have been identified and are under medical observation;
  • The follow-up of close contacts is ongoing;
  • Pathogen identification and the tracing of the cause are underway;
  • Wuhan Municipal Health Commission carried out active case finding, and retrospective investigations have been completed;
  • Environmental sanitation and further hygiene investigations are under way.

WHO is closely monitoring the situation and is in close contact with national authorities in China.

WHO risk assessment

There is limited information to determine the overall risk of this reported cluster of pneumonia of unknown etiology. The reported link to a wholesale fish and live animal market could indicate an exposure link to animals. The symptoms reported among the patients are common to several respiratory diseases, and pneumonia is common in the winter season; however, the occurrence of 44 cases of pneumonia requiring hospitalization clustered in space and time should be handled prudently.

Wuhan city, with a population of 19 million, is the capital city of Hubei province, with a population of 58 million people. WHO has requested further information on the laboratory tests performed and the differential diagnoses considered.

WHO advice

Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply.

WHO does not recommend any specific measures for travellers. In case of symptoms suggestive of respiratory illness either during or after travel, travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their healthcare provider.

WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.

For more information:

Can't find it on their website, but it could be there.

 

But you really think a January 5 overview has any relevance? I would say their end of January warning for a worldwide health emergency is much more important, even though quite a few world leaders were still playing it down at that point, some even continued doing so till 45 days after that advice.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

And why do you think the numbers are too small?

 

But never mind, same discussion as before, never any real arguments, only suppositions.

Gullible much?????    I have 5 water buffalo that need immediate heart transplants. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RoadWarrior371 said:

Gullible much?????    I have 5 water buffalo that need immediate heart transplants. 

Yes, resort to nonsense if you have nothing on the topic. Just a pity your argumentation is missing.

Edited by stevenl
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, simon43 said:

Agreed.  The WHO senior guys won't even mention the world 'Taiwan' in their recent interview and hung up on the interviewer.  WHO is brown-nosing the CCP and is biased.

The $64,000 questions, I think, are (a) how many well-stuffed brown envelopes have been observed by Swiss postal workers passing through their hands since the start of the year en route from the Chinese Embassy in Bern to the WHO HQ in Geneva; and (b) by how much this supply will be stepped up over coming months in order to make good the USA funding shortfall.

Edited by OJAS
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...