yuyiinthesky Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Russell17au said: Who said we had the funds. We still have to pay the rent for the shop with no income I'm sorry to hear that. I feel with you, I really do, this is a terrible situation. I promise you I will continue to advocate for a quick end of this useless lockdown, and hope that you and all the other shops and businesses can open again and survive. Edited May 3, 2020 by yuyiinthesky 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post yuyiinthesky Posted May 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 3, 2020 2 hours ago, Oldie said: You must be a funny guy. Laws are not only enforced if you see the need for them. Or do you have a different experience? A law is not a universal and eternal truth. If laws don't make sense or don't make sense anymore they need to get questioned, discussed, and changed, adapted to the reality. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimmer Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 Troll posts, flames, personal attacks and a post with multi quotes removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell17au Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 23 minutes ago, yuyiinthesky said: I'm sorry to hear that. I feel with you, I really do, this is a terrible situation. I promise you I will continue to advocate for a quick end of this useless lockdown, and hope that you and all the other shops and businesses can open again and survive. If people only used their brains and gave things some honest thought and looked at what is happening in other countries that are not using the restrictions at what the infection rate is compared to the infection rate here with using the restrictions and if people would just abide by the restrictions then it would be finished here a lot quicker but it is typical of human nature that they don't like being told what to do and they refuse to think about things properly and look at what can happen in the future if they do not abide by the restrictions. If there is a spike in the infection rate because of not abiding by the restrictions then the restrictions will be brought back in and they will be stricter and last longer and that will mean that our business will be finished along with many others. Never to open again because of people not thinking about anyone else and not abiding by the laws and restrictions. When you look at it Thailand has been lucky to have so few cases and I believe that it is because of the restrictions compared to America, Australia and other countries who refused to bring restrictions in. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker88 Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 Rules for rules' sake. That way guys with authority can exercise it. As guests, we are obliged to follow the rules. These people are stupid not because they risk getting the virus, but because they broke rules. They're going to get the virus eventually anyway. The virus is a part of our ecosystem forever. Nothing short of a vaccine will change that. Eventually we'll all get CV-19, and we'll either beat it or die. The point of social distancing is not to beat the virus, but simply to spread out the infection over the longest possible time. Too much infection at one time swamps the medical system, so not all patients can receive the care that might save them, nor can folks suffering other maladies like cancer or stroke or accidents get the aid they need. We will either get a vaccine or we'll develop herd immunity. Many are unaware of the fact that mitigation measures are not aimed at eradication, but just buying time to allow the best care for those infected. Many are going to die from CV-19 no matter what measures are taken. The only question is when. Yes, follow the rules. Be nice. Just don't think the virus isn't going to get its pound of flesh no matter what (absent a vaccine). Some people will buy an extra few months of existence, but those susceptible to the virus are going to succumb to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post yuyiinthesky Posted May 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 3, 2020 14 minutes ago, Russell17au said: When you look at it Thailand has been lucky to have so few cases and I believe that it is because of the restrictions compared to America, Australia and other countries who refused to bring restrictions in. No need to look so far away, Thailand's neighbor, Cambodia, had no curfew, no draconian lockdown, no alcohol ban, most shops could stay open (not KTVs etc though), and, surprise surprise, zero cases for 3 weeks now, and no deaths. Therefore I think that the restrictions in Thailand, as much as they had been understandable at the beginning, turned out to be much more than really needed, and should be mostly lifted now. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ54 Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 What a bunch dum flucks... I lot of police in US and here... don’t aggressively look to arrest people.... but you sit and wave in their face it changes their attitude... Don’t make a police officer look like their not their job. Waving with a beer in hand from what’s supposed to restricted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsve Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 12 hours ago, andre47 said: Because without these foreigners they would not open the bar. The foreigners are the problem because they pay for it. I would rather say that thai greed have once again showed its ugly face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboldie Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 13 hours ago, petermik said: And Thai,s do not drink of course....... Of course they do, when farang pay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Badboldie Posted May 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 3, 2020 13 hours ago, stephenterry said: Put it this way Peter. If the same scenario had happened in your country, e.g. US or UK, I doubt the report would highlight your citizens breaking the law, when it's more newsworthy to blame foreigners for leading your citizens astray. Quite the opposite, there was a load of pakis that were raping school girls in Rochdale, but it was all sweeped under the carpet, because they did not want to stir up racial tensions. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboldie Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 13 hours ago, owl sees all said: A few people having private drink behind closed doors. Don't see what they did wrong. Any gathering regardless of where it is, is illegal under current law! What part of that do you not understand? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdong Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 13 hours ago, bbi1 said: I would deport those idiots back to their home country. We don't need them here. Who,s we? Are you a Thai citizen?if not where's your home country? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdong Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 17 minutes ago, Badboldie said: Quite the opposite, there was a load of pakis that were raping school girls in Rochdale, but it was all sweeped under the carpet, because they did not want to stir up racial tensions. And the police and social workers who knew what was happening and turned a blind eye should have faced criminal charges,that's the result of political correctness,and fear of being accused of racism. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nkpjed Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 The law is the law it doesn’t matter if you like it or not that’s irrelevant. But there are always <deleted> who think the law doesn't apply to them, it’s pathetic. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacko45k Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 14 hours ago, Bob A Kneale said: Perhaps the bar is owned by a foreigner? The original post reads as if the 41 year old owner was one of the Thais. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post stephenterry Posted May 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 3, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, smedly said: of course you have but your comment was directed at people on here and not on the topic or discussion which I simply pointed out to you you call it whinging - I call it discussion I remember a few years back you were very vocal about the authorities handling the Kho Tao murders as was I - was that whinging too ? My original response was replying to a question asked of me, Smedly - if you care to read the discussion properly. And then you jumped in with your two-pennyworth on your soapbox, which was 'advising' (telling) me to go elsewhere. As for Thai behaviour it's ingrained in their society not to lose face and therefore they just don't take responsibility for their actions. It's always someone else's fault. Once we foreigners understand and accept that, we just have to accept that's the way it is and stop whinging about it. However, I'll cut you some slack as you do have good intentions - now without wearing your police badge. Let's hope the two Burmese eventually get freed from their ordeal, as IMO - and probably yours - they were scapegoats, which is a prime example of the worst Thai societal behaviour. Edited May 3, 2020 by stephenterry correction 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted May 3, 2020 Share Posted May 3, 2020 21 hours ago, rooster59 said: Three foreigners and five Thai nationals, some of whom are understood to be staff from the bar, including the 41 year old owner, were found inside. How dumb can some people be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prairieboy Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 23 hours ago, rooster59 said: Three foreigners and five Thai nationals, some of whom are understood to be staff from the bar, including the 41 year old owner, were found inside. It is idiots like these that create problems for law-abiding, rule following people. The government has already stated that the alcohol ban could be reinstated if the rules are not adhered to. (U-turn again?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodpav Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Never heard of this bar, it is now famous ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 23 hours ago, owl sees all said: A few people having private drink behind closed doors. Don't see what they did wrong. It's a bar that should be closed, selling drinks to customers that should not be there... does that help? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdong Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 30 minutes ago, hotchilli said: It's a bar that should be closed, selling drinks to customers that should not be there... does that help? Right on,crime dosen,t pay. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owl sees all Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 33 minutes ago, hotchilli said: It's a bar that should be closed, selling drinks to customers that should not be there... does that help? The 'bar' should have been closed/locked to keep fuzz out. No money involved; just a private party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 25 minutes ago, owl sees all said: The 'bar' should have been closed/locked to keep fuzz out. No money involved; just a private party. Doesn't cut it my friend... a bar is a bar therefore a licensed premises which under the emergency decree is forbidden to open. A private party should have been at a private residence then no issues. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebell Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 On 5/3/2020 at 9:40 AM, petermik said: And Thai,s do not drink of course....... Usually at a farang's expense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moe666 Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 On 5/3/2020 at 9:40 AM, petermik said: And Thai,s do not drink of course....... Read the articl the Thais were staff no customers. It is always the details that trip us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancharee Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 10 years ago the pussycat was buzzing even expats from downtown were coming up in minibuses, I just spoke to one of the guys that was arrested 2 nights in the jail 25,000b bail and court date 21st june passport was held he has been told to expect a 100,000b fine and deportation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob A Kneale Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 6 hours ago, jacko45k said: 20 hours ago, Bob A Kneale said: Perhaps the bar is owned by a foreigner? The original post reads as if the 41 year old owner was one of the Thais. Isn't that just the way that you interpreted it? The original post didn't actually say either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob A Kneale Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 20 hours ago, Don Mega said: 20 hours ago, Bob A Kneale said: Perhaps the bar is owned by a foreigner? The article suggests the bar is Thai owned.... did you read it ? Yes, I did read it, did you? The article doesn't suggest it was Thai owned; it did mention, though, that there were Thai staff which a foreign owner would have to have also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacko45k Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 (edited) 31 minutes ago, Bob A Kneale said: Isn't that just the way that you interpreted it? The original post didn't actually say either way. No....other people interpreted it that way too. Because the OP did say just that. Edited May 4, 2020 by jacko45k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owl sees all Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 3 hours ago, hotchilli said: Doesn't cut it my friend... a bar is a bar therefore a licensed premises which under the emergency decree is forbidden to open. A private party should have been at a private residence then no issues. Nonsense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now