Jump to content

Trump says U.S. to pull some troops from Germany over NATO spending feud


webfact

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Yeah, and good luck to Euros we have bailed you out in two world wars, eh? 

As mr pegman pointed out it was britan and her common wealth allies who held the line till we were attacked and furthermore if there was a (winner) in that horrible conflict it was the United States who reaped the financial benefits with out suffering the horrific civilian casualties yes we did contribute its true but you would be doing a great disservice to all who lost so much more

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stevenl said:

Are US troops there to protect Germany or is it in the US interests those troops are there?

 

Withdrawing back to the US would IMO be a strategic mistake, moving to e.g. Poland would be excellent.

 

If I remember that was pretty much the plan. Poland even wanted to name a base after Trump.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, meechai said:

Cut them to zero or rent the guarding service out.

 

Times are hard & getting harder there is no reason not to pull in the Military that is costing USA $$$

to protect those that can dang well protect themselves

 

Charity begins at home ????

Typical non-=thought comment. Although ordinary Germans would probably be happy, might be worth doing some research on what the US gets out of having troops in Europe before going in blind. :wink:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

NATO. But yeah, I'd be cool with moving troops to Poland. Good idea.

Guess you're aware that Poland is a traditional enemy of both Germans and Russians. That's why they prefer NATO (although they're far away from the North Atlantic) While Russians talk about an Eurasian "heartland" with Putin's "values" 

I wouldn't like any of these. 

But, yes, from a geopolitical view it's not a bad idea to create a reliable buffer between Germany and Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hugocnx said:

 

 

9 hours ago, hugocnx said:

In this case with Germany, YES.

Disagree, it is all about ego with him, and that was bruised by Merkel's announcement not to join a G7 meeting. 

With an increase already done and more planned, Trump's announcement 'due to not reaching 2%, is strange and to logical thinking people unbelievable.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder whether Mr Trump (is he talking to his Secretary of State for Defence and the professional heads of the armed forces yet?) has considered whether there are the barracks (and of course associated infrastructure: housing, medical, schools and so on) for these troops and their families? It is a bit more involved than "pick up your bergen and get on the transport"! 

 

That is why it took so long to draw down British Forces Germany after the Soviets sacked it.

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

I wonder whether Mr Trump (is he talking to his Secretary of State for Defence and the professional heads of the armed forces yet?) has considered whether there are the barracks (and of course associated infrastructure: housing, medical, schools and so on) for these troops and their families? It is a bit more involved than "pick up your bergen and get on the transport"! 

 

That is why it took so long to draw down British Forces Germany after the Soviets sacked it.

"That is why it took so long to draw down British Forces Germany after the Soviets sacked it." Huh? 'draw down British Forces Germany', what does that mean? 'the Soviets sacked it', same, what do you mean?

Edited by stevenl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stevenl said:

"That is why it took so long to draw down British Forces Germany after the Soviets sacked it." Huh? 'draw down British Forces Germany', what does that mean? 'the Soviets sacked it', same, what do you mean?

"Draw down" is an accepted term to describe the removal, and relocation of a large garrison and it's associated infrastructure to another (or the home) country. It is inevitably an incremental process.

 

The "Soviets sacked it" is a colloquial (slang) phrase in common use to describe the break up of the Warsaw Pact and the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Eastern Europe.

 

Does that help?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

"Draw down" is an accepted term to describe the removal, and relocation of a large garrison and it's associated infrastructure to another (or the home) country. It is inevitably an incremental process.

 

The "Soviets sacked it" is a colloquial (slang) phrase in common use to describe the break up of the Warsaw Pact and the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Eastern Europe.

 

Does that help?

Yes, thanks, helps.

 

The soviets sacked it seems to be unknown by Google, but glad to hear it is in common use.

 

Regarding your first part, you should at least have added 'from' to make it English, drawdown from Germany would have been clear.

 

But again, thanks.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Honestly, that makes no sense. Any chance you can review and reword? I would LOVE to debate the issue with you.

Sure but honestly you could check google and get the news reads just as easily with little effort.

The move comes amid questions over whether Trump was motivated to pull U.S. troops in response to a souring relationship with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. His decision came shortly after Merkel declined Trump’s invitation to an in-person Group of Seven (G-7) conference this year for nations with large economies.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/503046-trumps-move-to-pull-troops-from-germany-draws-bipartisan-warnings

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stevenl said:

Regarding your first part, you should at least have added 'from' to make it English, drawdown from Germany would have been clear.

"British Forces Germany" was the name of the garrison in Germany. That is why, in English, all three words start with a capital letter, (in this context they are "proper nouns"). The name implies that they were in Germany, so adding the phrase " from Germany" would have been superfluous, perhaps even tautological!

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

"British Forces Germany" was the name of the garrison in Germany. That is why, in English, all three words start with a capital letter, (in this context they are "proper nouns"). The name implies that they were in Germany, so adding the phrase " from Germany" would have been superfluous, perhaps even tautological!

Just gooled, and yes, you're right, was their name. Still 'the Soviets sacked it', in common use according to you, is unknown to Google.

 

I call it a tie, you may disagree. And for your sake I won't start a discussion on nouns.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Sure but honestly you could check google and get the news reads just as easily with little effort.

The move comes amid questions over whether Trump was motivated to pull U.S. troops in response to a souring relationship with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. His decision came shortly after Merkel declined Trump’s invitation to an in-person Group of Seven (G-7) conference this year for nations with large economies.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/503046-trumps-move-to-pull-troops-from-germany-draws-bipartisan-warnings

Yes, go on....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 6,330

      Australian Aged Pension

    2. 3

      Thailand Live Friday 20 September 2024

    3. 3,396

      President Kamala Harris

    4. 111

      Pager Explosions in Lebanon Target Hezbollah Members 9 Dead Thousands Injured

    5. 58

      PM Faces Pressure Over Thaksin's Alleged Hospital Fake-Out

    6. 1

      Thailand Introduces New Bill to Regulate Cannabis While Keeping It Legal

    7. 1

      Thailand Introduces New Bill to Regulate Cannabis While Keeping It Legal

    8. 29

      A full medical check up in the Bangkok area?

    9. 0

      Israeli Citizen Arrested Over Alleged Iranian Plot to Assassinate Netanyahu

    10. 0

      Mohamed Al Fayed Accused of Systematic Sexual Abuse: Harrods’ Dark History

    11. 0

      Israel Shifts Focus to Northern Front as Walkie-Talkie Bombs Signal New War Phase

    12. 0

      Teamsters’ Neutral Stance: A Blow to Harris and a Challenge for Trump

×
×
  • Create New...
""