Jump to content

What China’s struggles with a Thai railway say about the Belt and Road


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, khunjeff said:

This is a completely separate system from the current rail network, and will have no effect on the existing narrow gauge tracks - just as the elevated, standard gauge Airport Rail Link had no effect.

So a super high speed bullet monorail system, gotcha.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Considering it is elevated I would love to know how you think that is going to happen. 

You've never seen pictures of bridges that were washed away? Bad rains can bring down half a mountain side. Elevated highways get washed away regularly.

 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soi3eddie said:

Agreed but the Thais can still have the Chinese if they play clever. Let the Chinese invest heavily into currently proposed new lines from Laos to Bangkok but then find a "ransom strip" somewhere in the south that cannot be used or upgraded by the Chinese unless on Thailand's terms. Think of a number! Connecting to Singapore would not be possible unless agreed on Thai terms so all the earlier investment by Chinese likely wasted.

 

You've clearly never done business with Chinese.

 

They are 10 steps ahead of you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:
12 hours ago, JerseytoBKK said:

 

I agree that it will be very exciting for Thai people. There will be many betting pools set up to predict which province and how many times the tracks will get washed out every year. 

Considering it is elevated I would love to know how you think that is going to happen. 

Considering it is not elevated over the entire length, I would love to know how you think this can't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, greeneking said:

I would genuinely like to know what benefits you see. Many flights of 5000 baht or less and a flight time of 110 minutes are on offer already.

I would enjoy the journey, but after the fun trip my next trips for business or holidays would be by air. Transporting goods does not need to be done by high speed trains. Many Chinese tourists have very short holidays and want to be somewhere in the quickest way i.e. fly.

I agree, this project is a solution desperately looking for a problem.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dddave said:

One interesting aspect to this article is that "The South China Morning Post" is now owned by Jack Ma/AliBaba Group and in turn, is overseen by "Xinhua", the official Chinese news agency.

 

One must read between the lines.

 

BTW, in case people are unaware: KHAO SOD NEWS, including the KHAO SOD ENGLISH EDITION is now also controlled by Xinhua.

That kind of control by sinister forces is not unknown in Western countries too. The UK has gone BREXIT largely because of the influence of Murdoch owned media. And guess who owns Fox News and affiliates in the USA that played a big role in putting Trump in power - yes, it is Murdoch.

 

So, nothing new here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, greeneking said:

Many Chinese tourists have very short holidays and want to be somewhere in the quickest way i.e. fly.

Flying is not always the quickest way to travel. Taking into account the travel to and from airport, check-in, security, taxiing, etc.

 

For a 45 minute flight time from LHR to CDG, it used to take around 3 hours from arrival at LHR to get my bags at CDG. Security was the bane of everyone's life. Especially those who had not flown before, or those who had forgotten the rules or didn't know them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only gullible fools think there is some good for them in the Belt and road.  It's all about China getting goods out and raw material in.  And their military out if needed.  I think too many brown envelopes have blinkered the view of reality of many of those in power. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

Leverage, is that why China has been taking over patrolling the seas so they can see what they want to take away so that there is no leverage except there own.  In order to build this railway they will have to remove all of this countries narrow gauge line and that will then deal a heavy blow to the SRT and others that have modified there equipment to traverse the lines here.  How much money is Thailand to make from this new infrastructure, and what will be the benefit of having a bullet train here.  I can see the bullet train taking out many people crossing where they should not.  Chaos at it's finest.

In order to build this railway they will have to remove all of this countries narrow gauge line ?????????????????????????

The Hi speed rail will not transport freight, IMO, and the current rail will continue to serve those that can't afford the cost of Hi speed rail, or does anyone think it will have a third class with wooden seats and standing passengers?

 

There is, IMO no need for a Hi speed rail option in Thailand. Double tracking and better rolling stock that can go faster on the same gauge is all that is necessary, IMO.

The only viable Hi speed rail in LOS IMO would be between U Tapao and Don Muang with stops at Pattaya, Swampy and somewhere in Bkk.

 

Far as I can see, this train is designed to move large numbers of Chinese to/ from Thailand, Malaya and Singapore, so they should be paying for it.

 

I can see the bullet train taking out many people crossing where they should not. 

Hi speed rail is normally elevated for that reason. Perhaps LOS is different?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, webfact said:

to meet a 2021 deadline to open a link to China’s vast rail network.

For reference:-

Kunming to Vientiane will probably be operational in 2021 but southwards over the Mekong to Nong Khai and Korat never in 2021, same for Bangkok to Korat:-

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F9%2F6%2F0%2F6%2F1496069-10-eng-GB%2F20171006HSpeedRailMap.png?source=nar-cms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China has some leverage over Thailand as well - it can forget about Thailand if Thailand continues to dilly-dally and concentrate on a HSR project with Myanmar instead. But luckily for Thailand, Myanmar probably has become irreversibly stupid after decades of suffering in poverty. They worry over a "debt trap" instead of worrying over their own "poverty trap". At least fellow dirt-poor Laos has realised that they have nothing to lose by linking up with the strongest economy in the world. I wouldn't be surprised that by 2022, Laos may have more Chinese tourists than Thailand.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, toast1 said:

The Thai people will pay heavily for this foolishness.

It is easy to get into debt with the promise of shinny new trains, but when the bill needs paying, those who borrowed will be long gone.

No good can come of this.

Eventually, the debt will not be paid and a port or other asset will be handed over, its happened 100 times.

 

I don't know how they do it, but Thais seem to be very adept at coming out on top. They were never colonized, and the Japanese basically left them alone when they were brutalizing quite a few other Asian nations.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, toast1 said:

The Thai people will pay heavily for this foolishness.

It is easy to get into debt with the promise of shinny new trains, but when the bill needs paying, those who borrowed will be long gone.

No good can come of this.

Eventually, the debt will not be paid and a port or other asset will be handed over, its happened 100 times.

 

The Isan region definitely needs better transportation infrastructure, and this project can attract more tourists and investments into the region. I can see why some people hope that the Isan people continue to live in poverty - more supply of prostitutes to Bangkok and Pattaya?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

In order to build this railway they will have to remove all of this countries narrow gauge line and that will then deal a heavy blow to the SRT and others that have modified there equipment to traverse the lines here.  How much money is Thailand to make from this new infrastructure, and what will be the benefit of having a bullet train here.  I can see the bullet train taking out many people crossing where they should not.  Chaos at it's finest.

Wow, so you get 18 likes by making up stuff out of thin air - says a lot about the attitude on this forum.  Make up stuff to criticise Thailand, likes come pouring in from similarly like-minded miseries.

Please explain why they have to rip up all the narrow gauge track for this?  Where on earth did you get that from?  And stated as absolute fact, no "probably" or "they might" in there!

The existing tracks remain, this has nothing to do with them.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Selatan said:

The Sri Lanka port story was untrue.

 

The Hambantota Port Deal: Myths and Realities

 

Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence

Sri Lanka's foreign loans were mostly from Western sources. China's portion was only around 6%.

Finally a sensible post.

Also didn't Thailand reject China's loan terms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, josephbloggs said:

Finally a sensible post.

Also didn't Thailand reject China's loan terms?

We have to wait and see what the agreement would look like.

Financing issues were partly the cause of the delays. Thailand wanted to finance the whole project on its own because of "debt trap" fears but probably didn't have the money. Thailand also wanted to get involved a lot in the construction but didn't have the expertise and the productivity level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

In order to build this railway they will have to remove all of this countries narrow gauge line and that will then deal a heavy blow to the SRT and others that have modified there equipment to traverse the lines here.  How much money is Thailand to make from this new infrastructure, and what will be the benefit of having a bullet train here.  I can see the bullet train taking out many people crossing where they should not.  Chaos at it's finest.

Why make these distorted posts, what plans have you seen showing the high speed track at ground level?. What do you think the pillars are for? There are no crossings on the bullet train tracks.

 

800px-Khon_Kaen_-_high_speed_rail_link_u

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Khon_Kaen_-_high_speed_rail_link_under_construction_16_May_2017.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Selatan said:

We have to wait and see what the agreement would look like.

Financing issues were partly the cause of the delays. Thailand wanted to finance the whole project on its own because of "debt trap" fears but probably didn't have the money. Thailand also wanted to get involved a lot in the construction but didn't have the expertise and the productivity level.

Yes indeed.  I thought it hadn't been agreed (as they rejected the terms due to high interest) but wasn't sure if I had missed any developments.

Weird though as 95% of people on here say it is a done deal ands China is coming to take all of Thailand's assets and enslave its people.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...