Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For many reasons my Thai wife and I have decided to permanently relocate to Thailand.

 

We have been here 8 years and her current FLR Spouse visa expires in December.

 

Because of covid and selling our house etc. we may not be able to leave before her visa expires.

 

Citizens Advice and other immigration solicitors talk about a 30-day period of grace, i.e. if she left within 30-days of her visa expiry she would not face any criminal sanctions and, furthermore, would not be banned from re-entering the UK for 1 to 10 years. In fact one immigration solicitor mentioned a 90-day grace period.

 

I've tried to search for a government website that specifies this grace period. The only thing that I found was a 14-day grace period if you are re-applying for FLR. 

 

So my query is, is this concession something that is just done in practice rather than specified by HMG as a right? Anyone got any experience of this?

 

Btw, I realize that there is a special procedure now in place for requesting extensions due to covid. However, any request is not guaranteed to be granted so could cause us major problems if it was refused. Many thanks.

Posted

Tony M - many thanks for the comprehensive analysis. Very much appreciated.

 

I took a look at para. 320(7B) of the Immigration Rules which addresses the grounds for refusal of subsequent visas. It says :-

 

"

  1. (7B) where the applicant has previously breached the UK’s immigration laws (and was 18 or over at the time of his most recent breach)by:
    1. (a) Overstaying;
    2. (b) breaching a condition attached to his leave;
    3. (c) being an Illegal Entrant;
    4. (d) using Deception in an application for entry clearance, leave to enter or remain, or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application (whether successful or not);
  1. unless the applicant:
    1. (i) overstayed for-
      1. (a) 90 days or less, where the overstaying began before 6 April 2017: or
      2. (b) 30 days or less, where the overstaying began on or after 6 April 2017
      3. and in either case, left the UK voluntarily, not at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State;"

So that seems to clear up the 30 day v 90 day overstay, i.e. a person can only overstay 90 days without risk of a ban where the overstay began before 6 April 2017 therefore making that clause (i)(a) now redundant.

 

Btw, my wife doesn't have ILR because she cannot pass LITUK. If she does overstay it will only be for a few days for a number of very good reasons and she will leave the UK well within the 30 days.

Posted

You're welcome.  Be aware of paragraph 320(11), which is not a "ban" as such, but can (only) be used if there are other "aggravating" circumstances in addition to the overstaying, eg deception in an application (including previous applications. I don't think your wife would fall into that category, but it's worth knowing that this paragraph exists.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 11

      Click on a topic- always goes to the last post

    2. 11

      Click on a topic- always goes to the last post

    3. 2

      Getting Old: Stoic About It or Endless Whinger?

    4. 11

      Click on a topic- always goes to the last post

    5. 12

      Thai worker abandoned in Israel after hospital discharge - video

    6. 6

      Climate Talks in Turmoil Over Fossil Fuel Debate and Financial Commitments

    7. 3

      Car Rental Trap

    8. 12

      Thai worker abandoned in Israel after hospital discharge - video

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...