Using a US analogy. 

We need guns to be a deterrance on bad guys with guns. 

So republicans should agree that all countries should have them big guns.

7 minutes ago, Sujo said:

And why cant anyone do it. Lucky 911 wasnt dont by saudis. Oh wait.

 

  They can , but their enemies will try to stop them 

4 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Using a US analogy. 

We need guns to be a deterrance on bad guys with guns. 

So republicans should agree that all countries should have them big guns.

 

  Well off topic

9 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

  Selling arms is a business , selling arms to Saudi isnt done for ideological purposes , they are business deals

 

One cannot exclude ideology from arms sales to KSA, nor to other countries. Weapons sales are a component of foreign policy. e.g.

 

Mr Tillerson said America intends to intensify its efforts to deter Iran from engaging in Syria and Yemen, and Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said stronger US ties would allow the region to "drain the swamps from which extremism and terrorism emanates.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-21/what-do-we-know-about-saudi-arabias-arms-deal-with-america/8544892

Amazing how many swamps the Americans are involved in draining. 

12 hours ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

   Yes, there are plenty of people who view the USA and Israel as the baddies and their intention is to attack and kill the enemy , even building nuclear bombs to attack their enemy and so their enemy trys to stop them building bombs and they carry this out by killing the developers or bombing the bomb making sites 

Everyone knows that there won’t be a winner when it comes to nukes! I highly doubt that nukes will ever be used again by anyone, including Iran. Also, if Israel and the US have them then why shouldn’t the rest of the world?

1 hour ago, pacovl46 said:

Everyone knows that there won’t be a winner when it comes to nukes! I highly doubt that nukes will ever be used again by anyone, including Iran. Also, if Israel and the US have them then why shouldn’t the rest of the world?

 

   The more Countries that have them, the more the chance of them being used .

If Iran wont be using their nukes, why the need to have them ?

8 hours ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

   The more Countries that have them, the more the chance of them being used .

If Iran wont be using their nukes, why the need to have them ?

To protect themselves from countries that have them like the US and Israel! 
 

It’s common knowledge that a nuclear war can’t be won due to nuclear retaliation and the fallouts. Using nukes won’t do anyone a favor. The reason they still have them is as a deterrent.