U.S. Senator Cruz leads long-shot Republican bid to overturn Biden's victory

[welovesundaysatspace]

10 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But it ain't over yet.

Remember two months ago how we all had a good laugh? 

Edited January 5, 2021 by welovesundaysatspace

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

In those 59 cases how many cases was the evidence heard?  Were all 59 cases by Trumps team or were there cases brought by others?  Do you know the answers to those questions?  I highly doubt it.

So how many cases did Trump's lawyers win? How many did they lose?

[J Town]

11 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But it ain't over yet.

555! The fat lady went hoarse from all the singing how over it is.

 

Try it on for size - "President Biden."

[welovesundaysatspace]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

In those 59 cases how many cases was the evidence heard?  Were all 59 cases by Trumps team or were there cases brought by others?  Do you know the answers to those questions?  I highly doubt it.

The court cases are all online. I guess information research isn’t a strong point of those who hangout on Qanon blogs the whole day? 
 

[Phoenix Rising]

27 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Hey, Trump is only giving Raffensperger a chance to come clean.

Astounding, priceless......don't know what else to say!

     

[placeholder]

Just now, Phoenix Rising said:

Astounding, priceless......don't know what else to say!

     

You could ask how's the weather in that alternative universe.

[Phoenix Rising]

5 hours ago, codemonkey said:

check the navarro report too.

Stop by jan 6th congress meeting for a mega fraud evidence dump by trump.

Here, let me fix that for you:

Stop by jan 6th congress meeting for a mega fraud evidence dump by trump.

 

[Jeffr2]

30 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Hey, Trump is only giving Raffensperger a chance to come clean.  And giving him fair warning, rightly so, that there will be consequences for not doing so.  From the conclusions others have drawn from this phone call it seems they must have had the audio playing backwards.

Are you serious?  What Trump did was against the law. Stunning you are ok with the POTUS violating election laws. Stunning.

[welovesundaysatspace]

3 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Astounding, priceless......don't know what else to say!

     

Pathological criminals will always justify and sugarcoat their actions. Nothing new here. 

[Jeffr2]

18 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But it ain't over yet.

Yes it is, unless you are a conspiracy theorist and only read fake news. Incredible what some people fall for.

[Tippaporn]

16 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

Not surprised you don’t know what inclusion means, and who told you you or your lot would be part of bringing the country back together? LOL

Unless you're into 1984 doublespeak the word inclusion is self explanatory.  But you're now arguing that the right, or GOP, or conservatives, or whatever label you want to use will have no say in being part of a unified country?  Tell me, how does that work?  I mean, do you have a specific plan on unifying the country which shows how targeting conservatives for retribution reaches that goal that you've all accused Trump of failing in?  Let's hear it?  Or is it only known to Biden and you folks are clueless?  Let's get down to brass tacks on this issue.  I'm up for a sensible conversation.

[Phoenix Rising]

12 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You could ask how's the weather in that alternative universe.

I could but have started suspecting the sarcasm is lost on quite a few of them

[Tippaporn]

18 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

Remember two months ago how we all had a good laugh? 

It ain't over, is it?  We'll see who has the last laugh but we have to wait until it's all played out.  The fat lady hasn't even cleared her throat yet.

[placeholder]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

It ain't over, is it?  We'll see who has the last laugh but we have to wait until it's all played out.  The fat lady hasn't even cleared her throat yet.

Tell me, would you still stake you life on Trump being inaugurated on Jan 20, 2021?

[Phoenix Rising]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Unless you're into 1984 doublespeak the word inclusion is self explanatory.  But you're now arguing that the right, or GOP, or conservatives, or whatever label you want to use will have no say in being part of a unified country?  Tell me, how does that work?  I mean, do you have a specific plan on unifying the country which shows how targeting conservatives for retribution reaches that goal that you've all accused Trump of failing in?  Let's hear it?  Or is it only known to Biden and you folks are clueless?  Let's get down to brass tacks on this issue.  I'm up for a sensible conversation.

The first step in making sure the trump fiasco of a "presidency" isn't repeated is bringing the criminals that attacked democracy to justice. This will hopefully make others think twice about trying to use the office of the president as a mafia boss would. Lock him up!

[Tippaporn]

20 minutes ago, placeholder said:

So how many cases did Trump's lawyers win? How many did they lose?

How many chances have they had to win or lose?  In any case, you're trying to throw a question you can't answer back to me.  That ain't gonna work with me.  You should know me well enough by now, placeholder, to know I don't fall for tricks like that.  LOL

[J Town]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

How many chances have they had to win or lose?  In any case, you're trying to throw a question you can't answer back to me.  That ain't gonna work with me.  You should know me well enough by now, placeholder, to know I don't fall for tricks like that.  LOL

No, you fall for 45's lies.

[Tippaporn]

22 minutes ago, J Town said:

555! The fat lady went hoarse from all the singing how over it is.

 

Try it on for size - "President Biden."

What's the date today, J Town?  Is it the 20th?  Check your calendar.

[placeholder]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

How many chances have they had to win or lose?  In any case, you're trying to throw a question you can't answer back to me.  That ain't gonna work with me.  You should know me well enough by now, placeholder, to know I don't fall for tricks like that.  LOL

A trick? I honestly don't know. I do know that somebody whether it was Trump's lawyers or someone else won exactly one case. The rest were losses. So it seems unlikely that Trump's lawyers have a  respectable record. So I guess the answer is you don't know either.

[Jeffr2]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

Erm, what specific law did Trump just violate?  Remember, making things up is not allowed.

You should practice what you preach. Sadly, you don't.

[Tippaporn]

14 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Another instance of the weird notion that there's a positive correlation between nastiness and truthfulness. 

I'm sure you've heard the expression many times before, placeholder.  "Sometimes the truth hurts."  I guess some would describe the pain as nasty.

[J Town]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

Erm, what specific law did Trump just violate?  Remember, making things up is not allowed.

I KNOW I shouldn't take the bait (45 supporters aren't REALLY interested in facts, they merely want us to waste our time) but I have a few minutes to remind anyone capable of critical thinking what 45 did:

[onthedarkside]

A post implying some irregularities in the U.S. Presidential Election results in Pennsylvania -- in which the poster used and made his argument based on erroneous voting data -- has been removed along with several replies pointing out the error.

 

[Mavideol]

1 minute ago, J Town said:

I KNOW I shouldn't take the bait (45 supporters aren't REALLY interested in facts, they merely want us to waste our time) but I have a few minutes to remind anyone capable of critical thinking what 45 did:

his future doesn't look bright at all.... criminal charges in NY now criminal charges in Georgia and more to come, they should take his measurements for a brand new Orange suit

[Tippaporn]

23 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

Pathological criminals will always justify and sugarcoat their actions. Nothing new here. 

Or some folks simply interpret everything to fit their ideas of reality.  That's a very real potential explanation.  Although two opposing views can't both be correct.  Therefore someone must be seeing reality as it really is and the other must be, well, biased.

[Sujo]

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Or some folks simply interpret everything to fit their ideas of reality.  That's a very real potential explanation.  Although two opposing views can't both be correct.  Therefore someone must be seeing reality as it really is and the other must be, well, biased.

So where is the evidence?

[placeholder]

16 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

It ain't over, is it?  We'll see who has the last laugh but we have to wait until it's all played out.  The fat lady hasn't even cleared her throat yet.

The fat lady is still clearing her throat 63 days later? Is her airway clogged with falsehoods?  Does she realize that there are only 15 days left? Such a prima donna!

[Jeffr2]

6 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Or some folks simply interpret everything to fit their ideas of reality.  That's a very real potential explanation.  Although two opposing views can't both be correct.  Therefore someone must be seeing reality as it really is and the other must be, well, biased.

We know for sure that you rely on alternative facts.

[Jeffr2]

5 minutes ago, Sujo said:

So where is the evidence?

Alternate facts....

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

The fat lady is still clearing her throat 63 days later? Is her airway clogged with falsehoods?  Does she realize that there are only 15 days left? Such a prima donna!

Maybe that explains Team Trump's behavior. In vaudeville there was always a clown act before the featured performance.