Jump to content

Indonesian plane loses contact after take-off, more than 60 thought to be aboard


Recommended Posts

Posted

Indonesian plane loses contact after take-off, more than 60 thought to be aboard

By Fransiska Nangoy and Agustinus Beo Da Costa

 

2021-01-09T115541Z_1_LYNXMPEH08099_RTROPTP_4_INDONESIA-CRASH.JPG

Indonesian soldiers are seen at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport after Sriwijaya Air plane with more than 50 people on board lost contact after taking off, in Tangerang, near Jakarta, Indonesia, January 9, 2021. REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan

 

JAKARTA (Reuters) - A Sriwijaya Air plane thought to have 62 people on board lost contact after taking off from Indonesia's capital Jakarta on Saturday and rescuers said suspected debris had been found in the sea off the city.

 

The Boeing 737-500, en route to Pontianak in West Kalimantan, lost contact shortly after taking off just after 2.30 p.m. (0730 GMT), a search and rescue official told local television.

 

There were 56 passengers on board, including 10 children, an official of the national search and rescue agency Basarnas said.

Local media said there were six crew.

 

Reliable tracking service Flightradar24 said on its Twitter feed that Flight SJ182 "lost more than 10,000 feet of altitude in less than one minute, about 4 minutes after departure from Jakarta".

 

Agus Haryono, a rescue agency official, told Reuters that a search and rescue team had found debris suspected to be from the plane in the waters north of Jakarta, but it had not been confirmed that it was from the flight.

 

Sriwijaya Air, an Indonesian airline, said in a statement it is still gathering more detailed information regarding the flight before it can make a fuller statement.

 

A Boeing spokeswoman said, "We are aware of media reports from Jakarta, and are closely monitoring the situation. We are working to gather more information".

 

Surachman, a local government official, told Kompas TV that fishermen found what appeared to be the wreckage. Other channels showed pictures of suspected wreckage.

 

"We found some cables, a piece of jeans, and pieces of metal on the water," Zulkifli, a security official, told CNNIndonesia.com.

 

Nurhasan, a fisherman in the area known as Thousand Islands, told local media that he and his crew had found several pieces of metal.

 

The aircraft was 27 years old, according to registration details included in the Flightradar24 tracking data.

 

It was raining at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport at the time of take-off for Pontianak, around 740 km (460 miles) away.

 

Video images from the airport showed pictures of relatives of the passengers in tears as they awaited news of the fate of the aircraft.

 

A Boeing 737 MAX operated by Indonesian airline Lion Air crashed off Jakarta in late 2018, killing all 189 passengers and crew. The plane that lost contact on Saturday is a much older model.

 

SEARCH OPERATION

 

Rescue official Agus said 50 people were taking part in the search and that they would keep searching into the night.

 

Founded in 2003, Jakarta-based Sriwijaya Air group flies largely within Indonesia.

 

The airline has a solid safety record until now, with no onboard casualties in four incidents recorded on the Aviation Safety Network database, though a farmer was killed when a Boeing 737-200 left the runway in 2008 following a hydraulic problem.

 

The Boeing 737 is the world's most-sold family of aircraft and has undergone several makeovers since it entered service in 1968.

 

The 737-500 is two generations of development before the most recent 737 MAX, which has been embroiled in a worldwide safety crisis following crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. It does not use the software system implicated in those crashes.

 

Nonetheless, experts say planes such as Sriwijaya's leased 737-500 are being phased out for newer fuel-saving models. Civil jets typically have an economic life of 25 years, meaning they become too expensive to keep flying beyond that compared to younger models, but they are built to last longer.

 

(Reporting by Fransiska Nangoy, Agustinus Beo Da Costa, Tabita Diela, Stanley Widianto, and Tim Hepher; Writing by Matthew Tostevin; Editing by Frances Kerry)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-09
 
  • Sad 6
Posted

Of Course, blame Boeing!  No chance that the entity that was to perform maintenance was to blame on an old aircraft!  But then, this is South or SouthEast Asian where the concept of preventative maintenance is a meaningless phrase to 99% of the population! 

Similarly, I suppose a 70 year old person will find some way to blame the delivering doctor or midwife (if any was used) for all their physical problems now! 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Boeing surpressed internal concerns on the max.  Something is wrong when a company can pay 2 billion in fine for the max problem and stay afloat.  Just to much profit in prices these companies imho.  Translates to overcharged consumers. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Elkski said:

Boeing surpressed internal concerns on the max.  Something is wrong when a company can pay 2 billion in fine for the max problem and stay afloat.  Just to much profit in prices these companies imho.  Translates to overcharged consumers. 

They may have but here we are talking about a 27 year old aircraft whose estimated useful expectancy was 25 years!  And even at 25 years if something goes wrong, it seems more reasonable to investigate more recent checkups - there are an estimated 2000+  Boeing 737's prior to the Max that have been produced so they must have done something right!  Lets see where the investigation goes before heaping blame on the manufacturer.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 hours ago, darksidedog said:

That doesn't look good. The flightradar tracker shows it climbing steadily, then banking 90 degrees right and pretty much straight down. Thats not engine failure, its catastrophic loss of flight controls, as in something major fell off or seriously malfunctioned. Not good news for Boeing.

I RIP those on board in advance, because I doubt anyone could survive an impact of that velocity.

It could also be suicide by pilot.

Posted

It went into bad clouds and lost control are what blog pilots are thinking after checking lots of data. Then you only try to save yourself and the plane so no comunication. All happened so fast.

Posted

After a long period of grounding of these flying machines due to the lockdowns, could be some component was 'corroded'.

I hope, once the airports get back to normal, these incidents would not become very common.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...