Jump to content

EU stokes anger with plan to restrict vaccine exports through Irish border


rooster59

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, kingdong said:

I never said you did critisise johnson,and pointed this out in an earlier post stop trying to twist out of it,or better still post the alleged post i posted saying you did.

Yeah sure, that's what you were doing and felt the need to comment as such on a post that had nothing to do with your attached comment...lol

 

Your post

 

"Well it can,t be for his handling of procuring supplies of the corona virus vaccine,,while the eu dithered''

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Yeah sure, that's what you were doing and felt the need to comment as such on a post that had nothing to do with your attached comment...lol

Post the post as requested,all you,re doing is digging yourself into a deeper hole. or concede you were wrong.

Edited by kingdong
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, nkg said:

 

Predictable attempt from you to justify the EU's actions ????

 

We'd all respect you more if you were prepared to say "The EU got that wrong".

Not trying to justify anything, just highlighting the hypocrisy.

Three weeks ago the DUP were demanding Article 16 was used and Bojo stood in the House and said he would have no hesitation in using it if necessary.

Fast forward and when the EU suggests something similar the hypocrisy flows forth from UK politicians. If Arlene Foster sees Article 16 as an act of hostility then she must accept the same label in respect of her own actions.

Article 16 is not selective, the outcome is the same irrespective of why.

I would suggest that the decision to backtrack was a result of the Irish and EU politicians, rather than anything the UK had to say.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2021 at 4:45 AM, superal said:

I hear that Germany tried to procure their vaccine order roughly the same time as the UK in 2020 but were halted by the intervention of the EU bureaucrats who stated that the vaccine order would be a one off order to supply all 27 EU countries . Ironically the UK was still an EU member ( but negotiating Brexit ) when it signed the vaccine order with Astrazeneca .

So wake up Germany and drop the EU cos your hands are tied on any major national decisions . 

 

Where did you hear this?

 

As stated at the time; all 27 EU members could have done the same as the UK and used the appropriate EU regulation to take unilateral action. They all chose not too.

 

Also, other regulators, such as the FDA in the US, chose the more cautious approach followed by the EU27.

 

U.K. coronavirus vaccine authorization prompts grumbling by countries taking slower approach

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, transam said:

How's your country doing, Dave...?...:cowboy:

 

From your favourite news source....

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/15/dutch-government-resigns-over-child-benefits-scandal......????

Still you dont know this is not my country ...is brain problem starting  ..?????

 

Btw  that Dutch government stepped down on that matter ....elections looming ....but of course  a Boris gov. would never keep the honor on them to do such similar, if a scandal would appear .... under the carpet sweaped probably ...

 

I always laugh when i get such remark from you ...it means the fact i pointed  like Boris treathning with art. 16 is toooo much emberassing comparing the E.U. too quick response treath...... which was never activated nor voted only planned....and other E.U. politicians warned about the consequenses it could have about risking a norder ....and so cancelled!

 

Let's wait to U.K to make that same mistake ....sooner or later to hear a different jugment here ...????

  • Like 2
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Not what I meant, which was that we should use any and all leverage available to improve the crappy WA and so-called trade deal. That is no different to what the EU has done before and has just tried to do again.  

 

The WA and trade deal both lauded by Johnson as personal triumphs!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

The use of Article 16 in this matter was a huge mistake by the EU; one they have rescinded and acknowledged. Although it was not done out of vindictiveness towards the UK; despite the fervent wish of some here that it was so. It was done to prevent suppliers using the the open border between the RoI and NI as a route to other countries.

 

However, it was a foolish and unnecessary action by the Commission; condemned by member states: EU 'fiasco' on N Ireland heaps pressure on Commission

 Subsequent pressure from member states, the RoI in particular, has ensured their servant, the Commission, has, rightly, rescinded this terrible decision.

 

Covid: EU and UK 'reset' relations after NI vaccine row

 

Although a major blunder, the EU did use Article 16 of the WA; unlike Boris who simply threatens to ignore his WA completely and is praised by some for so doing.

Watching sky news last night around 18.00 hrs whete they were in paris interviewing people following a peacefull demonstration that developed into a riot regarding the corona fiasco and the people blamed brussels.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid: 'Lessons to be learnt' from NI vaccine row - Irish PM

Quote

"There are a lot of lessons to be learnt," Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin has said after Brussels reversed its threat to put checks on the Irish border.

This came as part of EU efforts to control vaccine exports, amid dose shortages in the bloc.

People had been "blindsided" by the row but insisted the EU's move was "not an act of hostility," Mr Martin said.

The UK says it is confident the EU will not block vaccines entering the UK.

International Trade Secretary Liz Truss said the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen had assured Prime Minister Boris Johnson that "there will be no disruption of contracts that we have with any producer in the EU".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2021 at 11:45 AM, superal said:

I hear that Germany tried to procure their vaccine order roughly the same time as the UK in 2020 but were halted by the intervention of the EU bureaucrats who stated that the vaccine order would be a one off order to supply all 27 EU countries . Ironically the UK was still an EU member ( but negotiating Brexit ) when it signed the vaccine order with Astrazeneca .

So wake up Germany and drop the EU cos your hands are tied on any major national decisions . 

that is correct

 13 June 2020

AstraZeneca has reached an agreement with Europe’s Inclusive Vaccines Alliance (IVA), spearheaded by Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands, to supply up to 400 million doses of the University of Oxford’s COVID-19 vaccine

https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/astrazeneca-to-supply-europe-with-up-to-400-million-doses-of-oxford-universitys-vaccine-at-no-profit.html

 

And Then we have a press release date 27 August 2020 from the EU comission

The “Inclusive Vaccine Alliance” countries (Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands) who started negotiations with AstraZeneca asked the Commission to take over through an agreement signed on behalf of all Member States.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1524

 

75 days difference between 1st Press release and 2nd press release

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kingdong said:

Watching sky news last night around 18.00 hrs whete they were in paris interviewing people following a peacefull demonstration that developed into a riot regarding the corona fiasco and the people blamed brussels.

 

Not according to this report from Sky News: COVID-19: Paris protests over privacy law boil over amid anger at coronavirus restrictions

Quote

Thousands of demonstrators in Paris were met with water cannon as protests against a new privacy law attracted larger crowds keen to air their grievances over coronavirus restrictions and France's slow vaccine rollout.

 No mention there of any ire directed towards brussels or the commission!

 

The Express doesn't mention French anger at Brussels either: 

Quote

"What started as good natured demonstration about the shortcomings of the way the French government has handled this pandemic has now degenerated into a series of very angry conflicts between the demonstrators and the French riot police."

One protester, Sebastian, told Sky News: "There is frustration here in France because people think we are not doing things as well as other countries."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

<snip>

The “Inclusive Vaccine Alliance” countries (Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands) who started negotiations with AstraZeneca asked the Commission to take over through an agreement signed on behalf of all Member States.

 

"Asked the Commission to take over."

 

Which is not the same as " Halted by the intervention of the EU bureaucrats!"

 

You seem to have forgotten that the UK government did not authorise the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine until 30th December 2020;  more than 6 months after the first of your press releases!

 

So what is your point?

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 

Not according to this report from Sky News: COVID-19: Paris protests over privacy law boil over amid anger at coronavirus restrictions

 No mention there of any ire directed towards brussels or the commission!

 

The Express doesn't mention French anger at Brussels either: 

 

True but when people were being interviewed just after the event the subject was the corona virus and latest development,perhaps you were preparing your tea and scones when this occured.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...