By Cod Satrusayang

 

The Constitutional Court on Tuesday said it would move its ruling on marriage equality to December prompting a viral hashtag and online criticism.

 

The ruling has been postponed multiple times by the Constitutional Court since it was due to make a decision on the case in 2017.

 

While the majority of parliament, including those on both sides of the aisle, support marriage equality, the court has so far been unwilling to rule in favour of same-sex marriage.

 

Full story: https://www.thaienquirer.com/33311/court-decision-to-push-back-marriage-equality-ruling-goes-viral-prompts-criticism/

 

-- © Copyright Thai Enquirer 2021-09-29

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow ASEAN NOW on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

As if it is some moral issue with male entertainment venues in major cities and 10's of thousand unenforced working girls in the country.

Who cares grow up and get with the 21st century.

Delaying is the word in Thailand. Why is it so difficult to come to verdict? It seems very clear that what is asked should be checked at the constitution. Why does that take 5almost 5 years to complete? Why no explanation of the delay?? Thailand is known for the gay community and should be an example for Asia and the world to show that gay people have rights too... Yes, a law, a civil union bill or samesex marriage  is needed here in Thailand because as there are no ways to do legal actions in case of death or decisions of life and death. Only family is allowed to make these decisions. I know that many gay people are banned by there family because they don't accept it... so please make decision we are waiting already so long  

I was under the impression that marriage had never been on the table but rather some kind of Civil Union.

Sincerely December is not that far away and ... I am pretty sure that they are waiting for the reopening of the country coinciding with the high season to make their announcement and attract the newlywed gay couples from around the world encouraging them to flock in masses to the Land of the Free ( free quarantine included of course )

15 minutes ago, alyx said:

Sincerely December is not that far away

 

57 minutes ago, webfact said:

since it was due to make a decision on the case in 2017.

And in December it will be delayed until next year......

The old cronies just cannot bring themselves to join the 20th Century. Never mind the 21st!

1 minute ago, Tropicalevo said:

 

And in December it will be delayed until next year......

The old cronies just cannot bring themselves to join the 20th Century. Never mind the 21st!

I was being sarcastic 

If the law is passed would gay marriage then have the same visa rights as "normal" marriage extension?

I think that there is no objection against the same sex marriage, but they are not willing to announce that. I believe the Government doesn't want it yet and I think they will try first to pass the Civil Union Bill. After a few years the will revive it and than a original marriage will be possible.. The people in charge are too old. They don't see the opportunities that will bring a samesex marriage to Thailand. Think about all the weddings of foreigners with or without a Thai on a beach and a party. A economic booster as Thailand is known for its acceptance in gays.  But ........

44 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

If the law is passed would gay marriage then have the same visa rights as "normal" marriage extension?

Who knows....that will probably take another 10 years to sort out. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

I think that there is no objection against the same sex marriage, but they are not willing to announce that. I believe the Government doesn't want it yet and I think they will try first to pass the Civil Union Bill. After a few years the will revive it and than a original marriage will be possible.. The people in charge are too old. They don't see the opportunities that will bring a samesex marriage to Thailand. Think about all the weddings of foreigners with or without a Thai on a beach and a party. A economic booster as Thailand is known for its acceptance in gays.  But ........

As mentioned above, the Cicil Union is on the table...not the Marriage. And the latter will never be voted if the Civil Union is adopted. As for your remark regarding the economic perk I might say that this is a small niche and looking back to what has happened in the last couple 17 months, I do doubt that this is a valid point

I agree with it all, why should the heterosexuals be the only ones to suffer ............LOL 

59 minutes ago, Geoffggi said:

I agree with it all, why should the heterosexuals be the only ones to suffer ............LOL 

Gay people are always gay LOL.. As dr John Gray wrote Men are from Mars Women from Venus... Gay people don't have that difference LOL

 

For me it is no suffering happily, but a need in case something happens to me. I don't have any family and my partner is now not allowed to do anything. Of course we hired a lawyer but still it could stay problematic. Easiest way to solve the problems is a legal status. Civil Union or marriage I don't care.. but it keeps on going............. delaying and delaying

Edited September 29, 20214 yr by ikke1959

4 hours ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

If the law is passed would gay marriage then have the same visa rights as "normal" marriage extension?

I should think so. Otherwise what's the point?

Look at the west. Run by all sorts of freaks promoting this garbage. Good for Thailand. 

5 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I should think so. Otherwise what's the point?

If a farang woman marries a Thai man she doesn't need income/money in back.

What about a farang male marrying a male Thai? 

7 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

If a farang woman marries a Thai man she doesn't need income/money in back.

What about a farang male marrying a male Thai? 

Need 1 million baht in your bank.

27 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I should think so. Otherwise what's the point?

Love?

6 hours ago, webfact said:

While the majority of parliament, including those on both sides of the aisle, support marriage equality, the court has so far been unwilling to rule in favour of same-sex marriage

Influences from above getting involved in a court decision?

I agree with the court. Marriage should be between a man and a woman. Given that you can live with whom you like there is no longer any need too be married. Personally I would rather the courts did away with the institution of marriage altogether. There is no need for marriage these days. 

10 minutes ago, Pedrogaz said:

I agree with the court. Marriage should be between a man and a woman. Given that you can live with whom you like there is no longer any need too be married. Personally I would rather the courts did away with the institution of marriage altogether. There is no need for marriage these days. 

Than they should change laws too. Probably you are not aware that if one of the partner dies the family of the deceased is in charge, because there is no relationship according to the law. But if your family doesn't accept the relationship and maybe don't have contact with them anymore, or if you don,t have parents or brothers and sisters anymore, who will be in charge? someone you hardly know? Because you partner doesn't exist nowadays in the law. Same for you are unable to give permission for treatment by a disease or accident. Only the lawful partner or family can do that... Imagine if it is life threating  and they have find family and give permission, because again, the law doesn't allow the partner not to do it. That are very existing problems and a marriage or Civil Union Bill could change that.  

2 hours ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

Love?

Well that's the point of getting married. But what's the point of changing the law if same-sex spouses don't get the same rights? 

A lot of empty talking.

Marriage should be private matter exactly as in reality.

Feet must be very sore from kicking that can down the road since 2017.

This dish has been on the back burner so long that 

 

...

 

Fill in the Blank

3 hours ago, LeatFingies said:

Look at the west. Run by all sorts of freaks promoting this garbage. Good for Thailand. 

Maybe Thailand doesn't want its social policies to be controlled by backwards bigots like in Uganda, Russia, and Hungary.

 

Sooner or later marriage equality IS coming to Thailand. The only question is when.

I compare this to Norway's decision to deport a kid who was legally adopted in Thailand to the way the Thai institutions attitude to gay marriage or civil union. Someone legally in a civil union, in their home country is not in a civil union here.

How about marriage. Is a marriage in Saudi Arabia recognised here...one in Mali, Seychelles, New Zealand...?

1 hour ago, olfu said:

Marriage should be private matter exactly as in reality.

Marriage is not private, not has it ever been.

 

Reading the Banns 3 weeks in a row, witnesses to the wedding...etc, etc.  Matter of Public record in the Register Office...Private my <deleted>...

8 hours ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

If the law is passed would gay marriage then have the same visa rights as "normal" marriage extension?

My first thought also,  Can I divorce my wife and marry a thai man , then i would have no financial requirements for a visa? then i can be a thai citizen in 3 years ? 

Where I come from, it's called "kicking the can". It's a fun game.

4 hours ago, thaitom said:

My first thought also,  Can I divorce my wife and marry a thai man , then i would have no financial requirements for a visa? then i can be a thai citizen in 3 years ? 

If you intend to marry for such reasons that is fraud. 

As far as immigration rules when Thailand legalizes same sex marriage or starts with a lesser civil union scheme its impossible to know yet.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited September 29, 20214 yr by Jingthing