Not necessarily in direct subsidies.
If it takes 5+ years in research and development to bring a product to market, fewer companies and individuals will be willing to take the risk if losses and expenses can't be used to offset current year income.
Predictions from the lead author of this study are mostly alarming and wrong this one added to the list of them including the climate scam.
No one else knew better at the time...
We'd already encountered SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV - both with high case fatality rates of ~10% and ~30% respectively - fortunately, theses viruses had a low transmission rate.
A zoonotic Novel Corona virus started to sweep through China at a high transmission rate matching influenza.
Case fatality rates were unknown at the time.
Every authority in the world was quite rightly highly alarmed at the time - it was only with 20/20 hindsight, once the CFR's were established that mistakes were made (in my opinion of course) to continue with full lock-down measures.
This has nothing to do with Climate stats or predictions - combining the two shows a flawed approach based in distrust rather than establishing facts.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now