On 8/24/2022 at 12:45 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Why would AN be cynically and negatively suggesting that they were, perhaps, unsafe in an otherwise very positive article?

I think we know the answer.

8 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

On 8/24/2022 at 12:45 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

Why would AN be cynically and negatively suggesting that they were, perhaps, unsafe in an otherwise very positive article?

I think we know the answer.

Do "we"?   Why don't you tell us?

On 8/24/2022 at 8:57 AM, webfact said:

but critics say that many are cheap and as effective as egg shells. 

Any link to these critics?

 

Any helmet is better than none. IF worn properly.

Edited August 26, 20223 yr by VocalNeal

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Do "we"?   Why don't you tell us?

Because it has become an increasingly cynical website that appeals to the cynical TVF populace and therefore generates more clicks.  90% of the "news" articles have a cynical slant.  Personal opinion, of course.

Wearing them to and from classes is a bit over the top... surely just to and from school would be better.

 

Moot point though cause when prize giving is run and done the helmets won't be worn again.