8 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

At your (condescending) suggestion, I referred to the top of the thread to find an indication of the topic, and what I found was a mention of one specific person who engaged in corruption, which you expanded to include her whole political party - which, strictly speaking, is beyond the topic of this discussion. You did this because she is from the party that you do not like. I then expanded the topic somewhat to suggest that there are corrupt politicians in every political party. Do you - or do you not - agree with that point?

 

I don't expect you to answer my question because you would never admit that your fellow socialists are anything but pure and honest. So I suppose that this is the point at which you will try to get this thread closed - and possibly even get me suspended - for engaging in the crime of "bickering". That's what you usually do when you can't win an argument.

You may have missed this part of the article:

"But the National Audit Office, a public spending watchdog, found in November 2020 that companies recommended by MPs, peers and ministerial offices were given priority."

44 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

At your (condescending) suggestion, I referred to the top of the thread to find an indication of the topic, and what I found was a mention of one specific person who engaged in corruption, which you expanded to include her whole political party - which, strictly speaking, is beyond the topic of this discussion. You did this because she is from the party that you do not like. I then expanded the topic somewhat to suggest that there are corrupt politicians in every political party. Do you - or do you not - agree with that point?

 

I don't expect you to answer my question because you would never admit that your fellow socialists are anything but pure and honest. So I suppose that this is the point at which you will try to get this thread closed - and possibly even get me suspended - for engaging in the crime of "bickering". That's what you usually do when you can't win an argument.

Did she organise those contracts with nobody else in the party knowing or abetting them?

12 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Did she organise those contracts with nobody else in the party knowing or abetting them?

I don't know. Did she? And if you are suggesting that others in the party were also involved, please provide evidence of that. Even then, I think it is highly unlikely that the entire Tory party was involved. Or are you saying that they were?

2 hours ago, BangkokHank said:

I don't know. Did she? And if you are suggesting that others in the party were also involved, please provide evidence of that. Even then, I think it is highly unlikely that the entire Tory party was involved. Or are you saying that they were?

As placeholder said earlier

"You may have missed this part of the article:

 

"But the National Audit Office, a public spending watchdog, found in November 2020 that companies recommended by MPs, peers and ministerial offices were given priority.""

3 hours ago, BangkokHank said:

I don't know. Did she? And if you are suggesting that others in the party were also involved, please provide evidence of that. Even then, I think it is highly unlikely that the entire Tory party was involved. Or are you saying that they were?

Placeholder provided the evidence above, It's inconceivable that she could get contracts that big without connivance from members of her own party and government.