Where is the proof of him wearing or not wearing the appropriate helmet.

Insurance Companies are the biggest legalised Scam on our planet.

They show no mercy.

Motor bike  accidents. Not wearing a helmet and medical   insurance cover 

Seems to be getting the norm here in Thailand ???????? ???? 

People reading about these incidents  should learn proper insurance cover and wear a helmet ⛑ required don't become a statistic

2 minutes ago, Mywayboy said:

Where is the proof of him wearing or not wearing the appropriate helmet.

Perhaps his traumatic head injuries suggested that he was not wearing one, perhaps there was no helmet found at the scene, perhaps it was reported that he wasn't wearing one.

9 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Yes, I understand that one should look at the small print but a lot of people don't bother, thinking the insurance will take care of them and not understanding that insurers will look for every way to deny paying out.

Completely and utterly untrue and I worked in insurance from 1986 to 1992

 

Every underwriter and claims department WANT to pay out normally (on all types of claim) because nothing fosters good will for an insurance company and huge repeat business when a perfectly normal claim is settled in full

 

What you fail to grasp (and so many others) is that every actuary EXPECTS there to be a certain claim percentage each year and premiums are adjusted accordingly up and down subsequently

 

I'll repeat that.....those claims are EXPECTED

 

In short we/they want to pay but no insurer will settle claims when the insured steps outside of his/her remit.

 

£160,000 claims are not denied (or accepted) by some junior office lackey......every single facet of the claim is examined by a suitable professional within claims checked and triple checked....period

Crikey another 1 Sad trust he makes Full recovery feel for all conncerned ???? No helmet according to his insurer's side of this story , l guess its on police & medical reports ?

Edited April 4, 20233 yr by Mad mick

5 minutes ago, Mywayboy said:

Insurance Companies are the biggest legalised Scam on our planet.

They show no mercy.

Garbage.  Why should insurance companies be responsible for uninsured incidents and the uninsured?  They have no more obligation to do so than you or I have to pay for this man's medical expenses.

 

Have you any idea of the percentage of insurance claims overall that are actually successfully paid out by insurers?

4 minutes ago, Chivas said:

Completely and utterly untrue and I worked in insurance from 1986 to 1992

 

Every underwriter and claims department WANT to pay out normally (on all types of claim) because nothing fosters good will for an insurance company and huge repeat business when a perfectly normal claim is settled in full

 

What you fail to grasp (and so many others) is that every actuary EXPECTS there to be a certain claim percentage each year and premiums are adjusted accordingly up and down subsequently

 

I'll repeat that.....those claims are EXPECTED

 

In short we/they want to pay but no insurer will settle claims when the insured steps outside of his/her remit.

 

£160,000 claims are not denied (or accepted) by some junior office lackey......every single facet of the claim is examined by a suitable professional within claims checked and triple checked....period

About time a rational, evidenced comment regarding insurance claims was posted here, well said.   

4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

About time a rational, evidenced comment regarding insurance claims was posted here, well said.   

What evidence was presented ?

The thing is that even they will find the money to help the guy, the next similar accident is just around the corner waiting to happen, Thailand being a mega tourist's destination will always have the kind of tourists that will throw cation to the wind and behave carelessly and recklessly, what do you do to avoid the next Josh from happening? good question.

The thing is that even they will find the money to help the guy, the next similar accident is just around the corner waiting to happen, Thailand being a mega tourist's destination will always have the kind of tourists that will throw cation to the wind and behave carelessly and recklessly, what do you do to avoid the next Josh from happening? good question.

The thing is that even they will find the money to help the guy, the next similar accident is just around the corner waiting to happen, Thailand being a mega tourist's destination will always have the kind of tourists that will throw cation to the wind and behave carelessly and recklessly, what do you do to avoid the next Josh from happening? good question.

1 minute ago, Ralf001 said:

5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

About time a rational, evidenced comment regarding insurance claims was posted here, well said.   

What evidence was presented ?

Personal, first hand knowledge presented by the poster.  What he said was 100% correct and that is based on my own personal, first hand knowledge of the insurance industry.  You may like to Google the percentages of insurance claims that are paid out by all areas of the industry...it is very high.

1 hour ago, webfact said:

The Ice Hockey player from Chorley, Lancashire, suffered a fractured skull but his insurers said they will not pay £160,000 to return him to the UK on a special air ambulance as they believe he was not wearing a helmet at the time

A hard lesson to be learnt.

4 minutes ago, ezzra said:

what do you do to avoid the next Josh from happening?

Publicise what happened to him and hope that some people take note of the possible consequences and do not opt to join the idiots club.

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Personal, first hand knowledge presented by the poster.  What he said was 100% correct and that is based on my own personal, first hand knowledge of the insurance industry.  You may like to Google the percentages of insurance claims that are paid out by all areas of the industry...it is very high.

So no actual evidence then.... just a nice warm fuzzy story from a random person on the internet.

 

5 minutes ago, ezzra said:

what do you do to avoid the next Josh from happening? good question.

So good that you asked it four times!

9 minutes ago, Chivas said:

Completely and utterly untrue and I worked in insurance from 1986 to 1992

 

Every underwriter and claims department WANT to pay out normally (on all types of claim) because nothing fosters good will for an insurance company and huge repeat business when a perfectly normal claim is settled in full

 

What you fail to grasp (and so many others) is that every actuary EXPECTS there to be a certain claim percentage each year and premiums are adjusted accordingly up and down subsequently

 

I'll repeat that.....those claims are EXPECTED

 

In short we/they want to pay but no insurer will settle claims when the insured steps outside of his/her remit.

 

£160,000 claims are not denied (or accepted) by some junior office lackey......every single facet of the claim is examined by a suitable professional within claims checked and triple checked....period

yes, but ... as I see it, there are some issues with insurance policies, especially travel insurance

 

the first issue is unclear or "strange" clauses.

for example about motorcycle accidents, on some policies there are clauses that say passengers of motorcycles need themselves to hold a MC license to be covered.

in general conditions of coverage are unclear for drunk passengers, helmet regulations, etc.

 

the second problem is the relationship between formal coverage and practical pay out. insurance companies often pay out even when outside of their formal coverage policy. this is most often the case with reputable companies with good image whose policy premiums are expensive, while other companies would use strange clauses as the above to decline coverage. the expensive policies are not usually those offered on discount travel sites, and even then people often don't subscribe the travel insurance.

the other problem with this is of course the lack of information about insurance coverage. I tried to find out for myself, but was unsuccessful. Short of talking to the claims manager, I don't think it's possible to find out what these "unclear" policies cover and what not.

1 hour ago, Ralf001 said:

Who's <deleted> are these massive repatriation costs pulled from ?

Covers family's flight too I guess.

1 hour ago, webfact said:

The Ice Hockey player from Chorley, Lancashire

cute.

Family should pay, take it out his inheritance 

20 minutes ago, Chivas said:

Completely and utterly untrue

I remember well that my mother got cancer and her private health insurance refused to pay for treatment. Not something to forget.

5 minutes ago, Letseng said:

Covers family's flight too I guess.

Maybe, but they are begging for 200,000 USD....

Edited April 4, 20233 yr by Ralf001

25 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

So no actual evidence then.... just a nice warm fuzzy story from a random person on the internet.

 

Search the insurance industry's pay-out record, it takes seconds to do.   

 

"...just a nice warm fuzzy story from a random person on the internet"

No, facts from anonymous people with industry experience on the internet versus uninformed opinions from anonymous people with no industry experience on the internet that choose to dispute the overall claims evidence, despite the ease of checking it!  Here's one source, there's many others...

https://www.unbiased.co.uk/news/financial-adviser/5-startling-facts-about-insurance-payouts#:~:text=So how much do insurers,policies were accepted last year.

 

"Travel insurers paid over £1,042 per claim in 2019/20 and the claims acceptance rate fell to 83%".

https://www.abi.org.uk/data/

 

Do you have any evidence that disputes these facts?  And quoting a couple of individuals' denied claims isn't representative of the whole industry.

Edited April 4, 20233 yr by Liverpool Lou

2 minutes ago, Purdey said:

I remember well that my mother got cancer and her private health insurance refused to pay for treatment. Not something to forget.

what was the companies reason given for denying the claim ? 

Put on a tight crash helmet and get a charter flight back home, where's your British stiff upper lip?

55 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Loads of them if you are outside of the touristic parts.

You would wear yr seatbelt in a car regardless. Why not a helmet on a bike?

"his insurers said they will not pay £160,000 to return him to the UK on a special air ambulance as they believe he was not wearing a helmet at the time. "

So it seems that they can't prove or disprove he was wearing a helmet, they just believe he wasn't?

So insurers don't give anyone the benefit of the doubt?

4 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Maybe, but they are begging for 200,000 USD....

Medevac plane got to come back, crew needs overnight stay etc. It adds up.

49 minutes ago, Emdog said:

Thailand has perfectly good hospitals, no medical reason for him to return to UK (other than national health program to pay). As a bonus, Thailand probably has far more experience with motorcycle head injuries than the UK.

 

I agree that gere are perfectly capable Thai hospitals to handle this person's injuries. In fact there is nothing in the link/article that suggests that there is no inpatient insurance coverage. There is no mention of unpaid hospital medical care.

What is at dispute is the cost of getting the patient back to the UK, likely an insurance elective rider that was not taken. How about any of the concerned relations come to Thailand as an alternative. 

7 minutes ago, Purdey said:

I remember well that my mother got cancer and her private health insurance refused to pay for treatment. Not something to forget.

Undoubtedly, due to it not being covered by the policy. That's something not to forget, either.